• OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    It obviously won’t get close to passing but it would be incredible for Democrats if it did. He has zero margin in the House, nothing major is passing into law except tax cuts. All his executive order policies are inflationary.

    So either he’s crashing the economy, taking the blame for continued inflation, or getting nothing of consequence done. And he’d be 83 and asking for four more years. He’d get crushed.

    • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      We’ve played this game twice now. Let’s not try a third game of fascism chicken

      That said Obama vs trump would be a funny campaign. “My fellow Americans, look at this absolute buffoon. You want proof I’m a natural born citizen? I’ve been stuck here with him too.”

        • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          7 days ago

          And while i think he’d struggle in that scenario I’ve gotten very wary of people (myself included) thinking “he can’t possibly win in this scenario” because that’s twice now been the prelude to defeat. Wheras in 2020 he was taken as a serious threat from the start

        • jj4211@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          6 days ago

          That was one race, and during a pandemic that probably would have lost the race for any incumbent, whether it made logical sense or not.

          Frankly I kind of wish he won his second term if he had to get another term at all. His bruised ego over losing, fear of legal consequences, and time away to stew on this have made him a far more dangerous president than last time.

    • Gammelfisch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 days ago

      Of course he will wreck the rather healthy US economy and break the unemployment record again, which he currently holds from his 1st term.

    • TiaNati@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      That’s a really dangerous way of thinking. We can no longer normalize this stuff by going “it’ll never actually happen.” It CAN happen. Get your head out of the sand and stop minimizing the very real threat our democracy is facing.

      • dx1@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        What democracy? We’ve been living in a police state our entire lives. Talk about a dangerous way of thinking, ffs, how many hundreds of thousands of people were murdered under the Bush administration alone, and you act like that was just healthy democracy? Why were Bush and Obama on the same page about the erosion of our civil liberties and global imperialism? I swear, some of you are just miles from the correct explanation.

      • OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        7 days ago

        This one won’t happen though. It doesn’t have the votes. It would require a Constitutional amendment, and thus a LOT of Democrats on board.

        You can’t freak out about every possible thing.

    • psyklax@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      And we were all overreacting about Roe v Wade. “Precedent”, “established law”, “checks and balances”. It could never happen, they said.

      • Franklin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        I really would like to see some of those checks and balances I’ve heard so much about. Must have gotten confused—it’s cheques for the rich, on our dime, to make their balance keeps going up.

    • Whitebrow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      Reminder that they control all branches of government and can do whatever the hell they want.

      Even though I partially agree that it’s probably somebody sucking up instead of them passing a “remove all term limits” bill instead.

      Or maybe they’re just testing the waters and compliance of the people currently elected, heck if I know.

  • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    134
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    8 days ago

    Good fucking luck with that hurdle.

    They need a two-thirds vote in both the House of Representatives and the Senate; or a conventio called by Congress at the request of two-thirds of the state legislatures. Then it has to be ratified by the legislatures of three-quarters of the states.

    Even if they managed a super majority on both sides of Congress for Trumplefuck, there’s no way they’re getting 38 States to agree to that.

    • Hegar@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      118
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      8 days ago

      I don’t think the law is a restricting factor for the trump regime.

    • kerrigan778@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      81
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      8 days ago

      It’s sad that you guys still think the rule of the constitution is some massive roadblock that they’ve somehow missed. They literally made an Executive Order that just says “No” to the very first sentence of the 14th amendment, do you think none of them noticed? They get to have a vote about ludicrous things, and they get to gleefully destroy the lives of any Republican who dares vote against them. Maybe it gets struck down for the time being? Who cares, the courts are packed, they can realistically just start killing people pretty soon and it’ll start with the disloyals and the true believers as needed as it always does.

      You cannot logical trap nor get off on technicalities fascists. It does not matter to them, they will just do what they want anyways, all that matters is if they can crush anyone who tries to stop them.

      They are pushing the boundaries of the conversation and they are testing the waters, and every time they’re pushed back on they use the limp push back to consolidate more power because nobody has been willing to actually stop them.

      • witten@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 days ago

        With all due respect, that is some real defeatist dog shit. Yes, Trump and cronies have no respect for the constitution or the rule of law. But if we collectively roll over at the first fascist executive order, that’s exactly what they want us to do… They are testing the waters. The supreme court is packed, but every circuit court in the country certainly isn’t. And that’s where these battles are already being fought. We need to collectively resist every encroachment, every power grab. Otherwise we’re nearly as culpable as Trump for the rise of fascism.

        • Lemming6969@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          7 days ago

          If you aren’t willing to kill them then they will inch forward until they win. That is why civil wars have existed.

          • witten@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            7 days ago

            Violence isn’t the only way to fight fascism. It’s surely a way. But the courts and the school districts are two early battle grounds where folks are already pushing back (non-violently) and preventing some of that inching forward.

            • Lemming6969@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              7 days ago

              Preventing some, some of the time, is how you get here, inch by inch, and eventually earlier wins become future losses.

              • witten@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                edit-2
                7 days ago

                Look at it this way… We have a portfolio of tools to fight fascism. Sometimes, yes, the proper response to a specific incursion is direct action. Sometimes you can accomplish more with other means (fighting back in the courts, etc.). It doesn’t have to be all or nothing, and in fact I’d argue you accomplish the most by picking your tools wisely for each battle.

      • mortemtyrannis@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        There are only two tried and true methods I am aware of to stop fascists:

        1. Killing them
        2. Making them kill themselves

        I’m going to enjoy seeing this comment get removed. I’ll think about it as I’m put on the train to the death camp.

        • Lemming6969@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 days ago

          I think the logic is sound… If anyone is allowed to introduce legislation against established reforms infinitely many times, you get gish galloped to death and they will eventually get their way no matter how terrible the idea is. Because it’s a deep ideology, you must get rid of the person to get rid of the idea.

    • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      35
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 days ago

      Trump is the candidate during next election

      Red States let him be an option even though they shouldn’t

      He wins enough red States to have a majority

      They name him president even though it’s against the Constitution

      The supreme Court is packed with his picks so they don’t do anything about it

      Tada! Civil war? Dissolution of the USA? Who knows!?!

      • Laurel Raven@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        7 days ago

        This.

        We need to stop acting like the norms matter at all, like the rules still apply. We must treat this like what it is: a threat to our very survival.

        The US government, at least the parts that actually could do something about this, are on the brink of total collapse or dismantlement. I hate to say it but I think the time for peaceful resistance is long since past, i don’t see any way this is going to end without bloodshed

    • Chainweasel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      Trump is ruling by executive order and no one is stopping him from doing any of it, constitutional or not.
      He’ll just issue an executive order to lower the threshold and at best that order gets challenged and goes to the SCOTUS, and we all know what will happen there.

      • drekloge@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        8 days ago

        The only effective short-term roadblocks are going to be legal challenges, like the ones WA’s governor and AG have been preparing for. You’re right that this only works until it gets overturned by SCOTUS, and it doubly hurts progressives because we now have to spend resources (time and money) fighting nonsense instead of fighting for causes we want…like some goddamn healthcare.

        Delay. Deny. Depose.

      • JcbAzPx@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        There’s already an injunction against one of his orders. I’m sure more will come.

    • ObjectivityIncarnate@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 days ago

      It’s obviously completely performative, this is a very common move in US politics in general, I’ve noticed–introducing a bill they know is definitely not going to pass, but makes them look good to their base.

  • Ænima@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    130
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 days ago

    It’s cute how so many in the comments think the legal checks will prevent this. They don’t care about the law or the Constitution in the same way they don’t care about optics, hypocrisy, decorum, or process. People keep viewing this through the lense of American democracy. None of that matters to fascists.

    • TiaNati@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 days ago

      I can’t like this comment enough!!! When will we learn they DON’T PLAY BY THE RULES. If the magats want this to pass, they will manipulate, intimidate, bend, or break the rules to do it. This is how coups happen. They don’t sit down and ask nicely, they just DO IT and back it up with military force if they have to.

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      8 days ago

      Yeah, people don’t seem to truly understand this, and I fear it will take something extreme before they do… And it’s likely already too late now, let alone by then.

    • TimmyDeanSausage @lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      8 days ago

      They care about the law the same way the nazi’s cared about the law until the night of the long knives. I suspect their mass deportation plan is really them gearing up for the night of the long knives 2.0.

    • samus12345@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      8 days ago

      After four years of them being in power, he’ll probably just be able to…not leave, regardless of any election. Who would stop him?

      • Pennomi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        8 days ago

        Presumably someone with better aim than the last shooter.

        I’d be very careful as a wannabe dictator in a land with this many guns. The next four years are going to be tense for everyone.

    • gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      7 days ago

      In the end, the country isn’t a democracy. It’s a complicated system with complicated interactions.

      It’s really not impossible that a democracy turns into fascism.

      • kahdbrixk@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        Deutsch
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        Thought about that regarding the current events in Germany. If people democratically vote for fascism, that’s still a democratic vote. Only the outcome might be less democratic (or not at all) but at least once people choose this path willingly, following democratic rules.

        At the end it’s perfectly legal to do this. The question is more if it’s good or bad. It maybe even stupid. But here we are.

        • Drusas@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          But then we would not be a democracy and being a democracy is written into the constitution.

          • kahdbrixk@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            Deutsch
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 days ago

            True, never looked into the protective mechanisms in our constitution. But I bet there is a way to change these mechanisms, once you are the reigning political power.

            Will have to research on that.

    • JcbAzPx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      They care so little they’re trying to get an amendment passed… wait.

  • Emerald@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    88
    ·
    8 days ago

    “It is imperative that we provide President Trump with every resource necessary to correct the disastrous course set by the Biden administration,” Ogles said in a statement

    so Biden created a bad situation for him in 4 years, yet he thinks Trump needs 8 years to undo it. Sounds like a skill issue to me.

  • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    86
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 days ago

    In order for it to pass, they need 290 votes in the House. The Republicans currently have 220 votes, so they would need 70 Democrats to flip.

    Then it goes to the Senate where they need 67 votes. First, 60 to get past the inevitable filibuster, and with 53 votes, Republicans need 7 Democrats to flip to move it forward and 14 to pass it.

    Then, the fun part, they need 38 states to ratify it. Trump did win 31 states, so he would still need 7 Harris states to ratify an amendment.

    • Walk_blesseD@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      28
      ·
      7 days ago

      Why are y’all still fighting about this? Your farce of an election is over, what purpose does this ceaseless bickering serve?

    • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      60
      ·
      7 days ago

      Fuck you, that wasn’t why Trump won. It was because Dems offer nothing but the avoidance of something worse.

      I’m outraged at the genocide and voted for Biden anyway. People can be mad at Dems and demand better without being responsible for their failure.

      • JaggedRobotPubes@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        The avoidance of all of this is probably the single most motivating thing in existence. Implying otherwise is strange.

        You don’t sleep in your actively burning home because none of the local hotels tickle your fancy.

        • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 days ago

          Which is why I voted for the lady who refused to condemn genocide. What are you arguing?

          Dems are center right. They have been for a long time because of cold war propaganda and brainwashing. That doesn’t mean I won’t vote against fascism. It means we need better alternatives.

      • Hobbes_Dent@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        47
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        7 days ago

        The American people failed.

        This was fucking advertised. This was chosen. This was voted for.

        Stupidest populous on earth.

        • Drusas@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 days ago

          I’m with you until the last sentence. Fewer than 50% of American voters voted for Trump.

        • TangoNoir@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          7 days ago

          How is any of this “chosen” when everything is gerrymandered and rigged?

          Our biggest fault was being the frog who stayed in the water while it was heating up. We have just slowly been giving up freedoms with a little fuss but not enough to matter. We need to learn to say no firmly and with conviction.

          • yetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            7 days ago

            Gerrymandering doesn’t exist in your presidential election.

            The majority of Americans supports - or at the very least is neutral towards - Trump. You can blame this on a lot of factors such as misinformation and lack of education but this doesn’t change the general attitude.

              • yetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.de
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                7 days ago

                The electoral college has bias towards states with lower populations but it’s not gerrymandering.

                Gerrymandering is specifically drawing district borders to guarantee victory with a minority of votes.

                The US presidential election would be gerrymandered if some states decided to go through mitosis to get more electoral votes for their party.

            • Drusas@fedia.io
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              7 days ago

              Something like 49% of eligible voters voted for Trump. And many eligible voters don’t vote. So no, factually, you are incorrect. A lot of people here are too poor to give a shit about politics and are completely unengaged.

          • Empricorn@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            7 days ago

            Any obstacles to electing someone else could have easily been overcome.

            If “Did Not Vote” was a candidate:

            This was completely preventable.

          • Drusas@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 days ago

            Anyone downvoting you is an idiot. This is exactly the situation the American people have been in.

  • IHeartBadCode@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    67
    ·
    8 days ago

    Me as a Tennessean: “I bet it’s Andy Ogles”

    Checks

    Goddamn can I read that man like a fucking book. I’m sorry we’re all trying to vote the bastard out but the State gerrymandered the district because… AND I SHIT YOU NOT… “California does it, so it’s okay if we do it too”. Honest to God what our State Assembly said about breaking Nashville up into a hellscape of gerrymandering.

    Do know, he’s an idiot IRL as well. He’s the kind that’s really full of himself and he’s got a super high self-worth in head.

    • conditional_soup@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 days ago

      I’m in Cali. I don’t think we’re even Gerrymandered that badly, tbh. Someone can correct me if they want, but last time I looked at our congress map, it seemed pretty sane to me. Maybe it’s changed?

      • irreticent@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 days ago

        I don’t know how bad gerrymandering is here compared to other states, but California Gov. Gavin Newsom has vetoed legislation that would have required dozens of his state’s largest cities, counties and educational districts to use independent commissions to draw voting districts, dealing a setback to “redistricting reform” advocates.

        “We’re frustrated, confused and deeply disappointed,” Jonathan Mehta Stein, executive director of voting rights group California Common Cause, said Monday. He added: “We were hopeful that this was an opportunity for California to show the rest of the nation what it looks like to put gerrymandering behind us.”

        • conditional_soup@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          7 days ago

          Wow, geez, thanks for sharing that. I’m not at all surprised by that fucking maneuver from Newsom. Fox News puts in overtime making him sound like a really cool insane leftist when he’s pretty solidly centrist democrat, and all in favor of bullshit political games / bulldozing the homeless.

  • Furbag@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    66
    ·
    7 days ago

    What a frivolous waste of congressional speaking time. I thought these guys had real problems to solve? I thought Trump was gonna fix it all this time around? You’re telling me not even 1 week into his new term and he’s already thinking about how the job won’t be done in time?

    Conservatives are pathetic.

    • JcbAzPx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 days ago

      On the other hand, better they do nothing than actuality successfully fucking everything up.

      • psud@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        The worry is that perhaps Trump is smarter than he appears, and all he’s doing is showing his followers that he’s still all about setting up a autocratic government which they’ll get to be the muscle for, ready to do a violent takeover the moment elections stop working (just like last time, but this time better armed and better organised)

        • JcbAzPx@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 days ago

          Trump, if anything, is much less smart than he appears. The guy managed to bankrupt a casino. That takes a special kind of stupid.

    • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      7 days ago

      That’s basically what I’ve been posting on Social Media anytime shit like this happens.

      “How does this lower grocery prices?”

      Ask whenever the Right or Center is listening, keep the message on “Trump is distracting you from what he isn’t doing, but should.”

      • jj4211@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        Thank you for saying grocery instead of egg. So many people say eggs and it is going to age like milk when the bird flu recedes even though groceries will generally still be expensive otherwise.

    • OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      If this fails, you can expect them to redefine what a “term” means. And if that fails they can simply cancel elections under “emergency” conditions and keep him in office for longer.

      … and if that fails, they can just say “too bad” and do whatever they want anyway because who’s going to stop them?

    • Crikeste@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      7 days ago

      I just want to point out that this is just one of the many many campaign promises he is trying to fulfill. Sure, it’s a big deal. But simply saying “conservatives are pathetic” is not only reactionary, it is wrong. Look at what is happening to immigrants. You might not see them as a problem, but conservatives do, and they are “solving” it.

      Just saying, this shit is way scarier this time around. They’re fuckin’ moving.

    • unmagical@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      60
      ·
      8 days ago

      No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than three times, nor be elected to any additional term after being elected to two consecutive terms…

      Obama served 2 consecutive terms so would be ineligible. They literally wrote this so that only Trump would be eligible.

    • Tinidril@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      82
      ·
      8 days ago

      Oh, fuck no. Obama’s leadership is what got us in this mess. He and the Clinton’s drove the Democratic party off a cliff.

      • AfricanExpansionist@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        37
        ·
        edit-2
        8 days ago

        Salty downvotes on this comment. Very funny

        Imagine trying to pretend the Clintons weren’t just Reaganites, or that Obama wasn’t a total fraud

        • Tinidril@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 days ago

          Obama’s got that boyish grin and professorial demeanor. That and being the first black President are all most people seem to need.

          As President he capitulated to Wall Street on day one. His signature achievement was a healthcare plan that came from the same right wing think tank that brought us Project 2025. As party leader, he bankrupted the DNC allowing Hillary to helicopter in with cash and demand their loyalty in the 2016 primary. The moment he left the presidency he did a Wall Street tour collecting millions in “speaking fees”. Since then he has been working behind the scenes to undercut every effort to move the Democratic party in a progressive direction that could have countered Trump’s populism.

          It’s truly amazing that Democrats are still delusional about him.

  • IninewCrow@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    8 days ago

    Do they really expect their orange beanbag leader to still be alive in four years? And if he still is, to still be able to know his own name or speak coherently in public?

    • elgordino@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      8 days ago

      Actuarial tables for an obese guy of his age reckon 50/50 chance of making it to the end of his term. Of course he has access to better healthcare than most.

      • Stern@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        8 days ago

        Better health care but I gotta imagine day to day odds aren’t so hot for a dude who’s on a diet of McDonalds and Diet Coke. Kind of surprised he’s made it to 78.

        • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          8 days ago

          Seems there are some people who can subsist completely on hate and cruelty as if it powers them, and they outlive us all. Just more evidence that this is all just a cosmic joke.

        • NuclearDolphin@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          Trump eating like shit is a phony PR campaign to win support from middle America. Dude has dozens of private chefs. He absolutely eats healthier than the average American. He just eats McDonalds when cameras are rolling.

      • IninewCrow@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        8 days ago

        I can see him possibly making it that far … but I really don’t think he’ll be making much more sense the older he gets. He could live another 20 years, it doesn’t mean he’ll have all his marbles.

      • jpreston2005@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        8 days ago

        They’ll prop his bloated corpse onto a metal pole to put behind glass as they continue to run things while their dear leader ‘rests and recuperates.’

    • floofloof@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      8 days ago

      He only needs to stagger over the four-year line before dropping dead, and Republicans get to stay in charge for four more years.

      • Tinidril@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        8 days ago

        They know it has no chance to pass. It’s with straight up boot licking, or they think they have a plan to bypass the amendment process.