UN general assembly majority vote, but security council, the permanent members all need to agree as even one nay is a veto.
UN general assembly majority vote, but security council, the permanent members all need to agree as even one nay is a veto.
Why is no one mentioning, that under the 14th amendment, there is literally no statement on whether or not its state or congress power. All it says is they just become ineligible when they committed the insurrection. The only power given to congress is, you can override it and allow them to run again. Supreme Court seems to ignore the entire wording, if they agree that trump committed the insurrection is factual, than he should be ineligible per the wording.
The wording is similar to criminal law rather than amendment, be a politician who decides to rebel or commit an insurrection than no more politics for you. This was also written to make sure no one in the confederacy to run in politics, and if that’s the case than its also the case that trump cannot run, as its automatically applied.
Also, the big issue is people assume migrants take jobs, they usually take the jobs americans do not want to work as and shows it with the labor force in florida with agriculture, majority I believe work in agriculture.
The reason for that was because he could not have a pc or access to the internet but an amazon fire stick, is allowed since they do not expect him to use it for other purposes with the browser. Must have found a site that gave him access to a virtual machine or a VPS virtual private server to phish a rockstar games employee and from there access slack and then release footage of it on gtaforums.
or make the battery replaceable
Is this not a violation of the 14th amendment at all. What if some of the palestinians were born in america, even if the supreme court is radical, the 14th amendment is so clearly stated, “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.”
It is clearly written, and they cannot interpret state being only states and not the federal government they must pass an amendment to overturn it, and it is clearly that the last line “Nor deny any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of laws”, basicially states you cannot deny an american his right to being equal and does not state, if it is only state law and if they fuck with it, it could unleash all hell as now anyone could have there citizenship taken away by the federal government because of what nation they from.
They still must respond to them since a subpoena is a response, but if you store no logs like Mullvad and the police get a search warrant to find user logs and walks away with nothing shows you the VPN to get for privacy .
Nah, it’s not that it’s that one asshole who decided to write an article about how “Vaccines cause autism.” That’s how the whole anti-vaxxer movement came to be.
I know apple making a usb-c phone is crazy, wonder who pushed it, definitely not the EU.
True, I’ll rechange it now back to megathread and link articles to it. My mistake, and let the debate war begin.
It’s suppose to be megathread.
Expect when you got teachers “Memorize all the formulas as it’ll be on the test.” and they don’t provide the formulas even though in the real world, they just fucking look it up.
True, and let’s not forget, freeing all the people that just did drugs rather then, well selling or distributing.
That’s the goal, no echo chamber allowed. That’s one different between us and r/politics.
So, I won’t admit to anyone else but aidan, but I looked at aidans and he seemed fine, while his opinion on schooling I may not agree with at all, doesn’t mean it should affect his status as to be moderator, as both of us agreed, he was part of our 2 pick we need.
Yes, right now we need two moderators but towards winters, we’ll start looking for more applications due to, well presidental election next year and we gotta be prepared.
Thanks for the report, and it doesn’t seem any noteworthy that would affect his status as moderator. If he does something like using his powers or status then I’ll take action against him.
Agreed, nothing here was broken not even low effort, we’re trying to avoid the echo chamber and giving the right a voice.
True, early 2024 or december of 2023 we gonna get that train ready and try to hire way more moderators as we were limited by applications but by that time I hope way more apply as it’s going to be hell in comments.
The capacitor plague era, ever wonder why we don’t see a lot of PC’s in the early 2000s, this is why as everything with a cap would fail and kill the boards, essentially having to call on the oem to fix it.