• Dave@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 minutes ago

    Half of new Netflix subscribers opt for the $8 per month option rather than ad-free subscriptions, which start at $18 per month, the company says.

    Damn, when did it get so expensive? Assuming that’s USD. That’s a decent amount more than Disney+, right?

  • J52@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Haha, the kicker is that it’s pure greed. With their prices they don’t need it and could improve it with what the community wants, but $$$, hey… been away for nearly 2 years now, thought of tipping my toes in again but with that they can f… right off.

  • Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Either they have great technology, or they have great entertainment,” she said. “Our superpower has always been the fact that we have both.

    Please. Your software is an image carousel and a video player.

  • madjo@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    What the fuck is up with that image of Wednesday?! It doesn’t look like Ortega’s Wednesday to me. Is it ai generated?

  • Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Ahhhh, man moving away from corps just keeps on giving (or in this case, doesn’t enshitify while proprietary ones do).

  • ☂️-@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    11 hours ago

    🏴‍☠️🏴‍☠️🏴‍☠️🏴‍☠️🏴‍☠️🏴‍☠️🏴‍☠️ cmon people, stop making netflix relevant

    • Limonene@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Rejecting Netflix fixes things for you and me, but the article says Netflix has 93 million ad-supported subscribers. I’m really worried about the amount of influence advertisers have on our society, and it’s only getting worse. Even if you and I can be above the direct influence of these ads, many people are not, and those people are influencing you and me. This produces a dangerous secondary influence that can reach most of society, and just fills everyone’s mind with lies, for hardly any cost.

  • Furbag@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Is there a way to poison the well so badly and so irrevocably that corporations won’t dare use generative AI for anything? Can we somehow trick these overgrown chatbots to speak ill of their masters in the form of direct-to-stream advertisements?

  • MiyamotoKnows@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Aside from 🏴‍☠️ there are simply too many legitimate pay streaming options in 2025 for Netflix to think they can do this. This will end like an arrogant urban cowboy being flung off a mechanical bull and I’m all for it.

  • AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Is your egg too expensive?
    Look no further. Our egg is much smoother and can be worn with most garments.

    EggEgg. For your egg.

  • essteeyou@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    14 hours ago

    I was looking to cut down on subscriptions and picked Netflix as an experimental one. I haven’t missed it at all. Things like this make me less likely to occasionally reactivate for a couple of months as I was originally planning.

    I wonder when they’ll see a big enough effect to break their current run of fucking over their customers.

    • dmention7@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      12 hours ago

      I also thought I’d miss Hulu and Netflix a lot more than I do. What used to irk me so badly was how utterly shit Netflix is when you just want to sit down and find something new to watch. Their front page would be list after list of things like “Hot New Comedies” “Best Independent Films of 2025”, “Classic Action Flicks” and somehow it always felt like the same 30 or 40 movies randomly shuffled together. So I’d spend 15 minutes scrolling through the same slop in different orders, get frustrated and search for a movie that I remembered wanting to watch, only to find that it was on none of the services I was subscribed to, and cost $8.99 for a single watch of a 20 year old movie.

      We had been Netflix subscribers since the very start when they delivered discs through the mail. Kinda sad how they went from having virtually anything you could think of to watch (and having a halfway decent recommendation algorithm to boot!) to where they are today.

      • samus12345@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Kinda sad how they went from having virtually anything you could think of to watch (and having a halfway decent recommendation algorithm to boot!) to where they are today.

        They’re not entirely to blame - once other companies saw that this streaming thing actually made money, they pulled all their stuff and put it on their own services, leading to the cable 2.0 we have today.

        Everything else that sucks about them now, though, yeah, they’re to blame.

    • BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      13 hours ago

      My kids have missed it more than me (which I don’t) but they’re easy to distract with one of the other streaming services I still have. The last price hike did it for me.