Since we’re using El Salvador like it’s a new Gitmo. Like yes, it would still suck for the people from El Salvador.

But at least people from other countries would go back to their home country. Presumably to be treated far better than El Salvador.

  • Ricky Rigatoni@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Because then most of the people being deported right now would just be deported to the US, causing a paradox and unfolding reality.

  • HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 hours ago

    it’s not a law that one country can make. it’s a law that requires agreement between countries via international treaty

    • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      We could easily, and should, implement a law saying that people must be deported back to their own country. It just means fewer people would be deported.

      • nutsack@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        it’s not a law that one country can make. it’s a law that requires agreement between countries via international treaty

  • ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Do you remember how prisoners were kept in Guantanamo Bay, even after they were no longer suspected of any wrongdoing, simply because there wasn’t a country that would both accept them and treat them in accordance with US law? Many of those prisoners ended up nowhere near where they came from.

    Some countries refuse to accept deportees. Some countries are so likely to mistreat deportees that sending them to those countries is illegal. Some countries simply don’t exist anymore.

    • Squizzy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      13 hours ago

      The fucking thought that Americans feel superior enough to not allow another country to take them…in this case from their extra judicial torture black site.

        • Squizzy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 hours ago

          The point being that the US would see fit to refuse to return someone to a particular country all the while torturing them in the same black site.

  • Arcane2077@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    18 hours ago

    I mean, ignoring the law is this administration’s whole thing, so it wouldn’t matter. Also, as we’ve seen in the UK as well as the US, many targetted individuals have never even been to “their own country”.

  • vvilld@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Because both Houses of Congress are controlled by Republicans who are 100% in support of everything the regime is doing.

  • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    17 hours ago

    I bet the general answer from congress would be “Why? It’s not our country’s problem where they end up once out of here”

  • Formfiller@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Because our laws only protect the wealthy, enforce racism, sexism and are getting worse and more genocidal in real time

  • Lembot_0002@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    83
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    Because Congress doesn’t care about the well-being of those people. Why else would this nuance be inserted into the law?

  • Archangel@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    65
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    Congress recently passed a law that allows people to be deported without due process. They’re not trying to stop him…they’re actively helping him.

  • tiredofsametab@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 day ago

    To the current constitution-violating republican administration, none of this matters and the cruelty is part of it. That said, let’s play a game:

    • what is the country of someone who grew up in the US, possibly speaking only English?
    • what happens if the country is inaccessible for some reason (countries occasionally collapse or close borders)
    • what happens if the borders of the country change and the person’s hometown (or all their family) is now in country X instead of their country of birth Y

    There are probably more weird edge cases that would need to be in any law as well.

    • phx@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Yup. Just waiting for a little while from now when Trump starts deporting Ukranians to Russia because “well the place they came from doesn’t exist it’s Russian now”

    • themoonisacheese@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 day ago

      Also, if someone claims asylum, international law explicitly forbids sending them back to their country (not that international law has any bearing whatsoever on this but y’know, add a layer on top)