I didn’t say AI, I said LLM.

The value isn’t as important and is more misleading.

You can create your own instance and give yourself as much karma as you want.

There are no internal Lemmy structures to prevent mass upvoting or downvoting.

Culture and voting rules across Lemmy are different and without a centralized authority.

Since the number is useless, it is made unavailable.

A combination of personal vetting via analyzing output and the vetting of others. For instance, the Pentium calculation error was in the news. Otherwise, calculation by computer processor is understood and the technology is acceptable to be used for cases involving human lives.

In contrast, there are several documented cases where LLM’s have been incorrect in the news to a point where I don’t need personal vetting. No one is anywhere close to stating that LLM’s can be used in cases involving human lives.

By the mid 1800’s, chattel slavery was around in the USA for over 200 years. Even after slavery ended, an enforced caste system was put in place.

You would need the robots a lot earlier to prevent the slave trade.

“Honey, I’m flattered, but I don’t have the same feelings for you. Even if I did, it would be inappropriate for us to have a relationship. I hope you find someone else closer to your age.”

On the use side, a lot of users want an answer to their question, not a list of pages that may have the answer, with the answer made more obscure via SEO optimization. AI is just a continuation of this.

Yeah, I figure this isn’t going to be an American only problem.

How are other countries different?

How are other countries handling it? I can’t imagine AI being an American only education issue.

If you want to compare a calculator to an LLM, you could at least reasonably expect the calculator result to be accurate.

Bon jour. Je suis un grand Muzzy!

Different parts of the USA have different expectations for small talk, but it is generally higher than I’ve seen for parts of Europe.

That said, being outgoing is a muscle for some people and, because of cultural differences, Americans tend to work out this muscle more than other countries.

Yeah, but because the inflation makes him look bad.

Yeah. He’s more effective now.

Probably bisexual, but you’ve got a type.

There are three things occurring with this new facility:

1. Construction - Generally, the cost of construction is far larger than the tax for the construction project. The county may build the jail in a few years, but the taxes to pay for it usually take over a decade to pay back.

2. Operation - Once you open the facility, you have to use it. That generally requires some form of operations budget. Facilities cost money to run and intelligent governments try to plan that into building a new facility.

3. Maintenance - The building isn’t going to last forever, and a lot of modern buildings need more effort to maintain them then older buildings. It is common for facilities to need significant maintenance work every 15 years. If you’re going to bond to build a facility, why not include maintenance as part of the total cost of life for the facility?

I find it depends on how they get compensated.

To add to it, I wouldn’t put “Internet” as a subculture since that is way too broad of a definition of place.

Most constitutional monarchies got that way due to incremental change generally caused by political crises. Switching from a monarchy to a republic usually done as a response to one of these crises; no crisis usually means the monarch keeps the crown.

You also have an issue of what to replace the monarch with. Most constitutional monarchies have parliamentary systems of government where the legislature has supremacy. However, you still need a supreme executive to run a government when the legislature fails. The process of picking that person is very politically important and had inherent risks to it. For some countries, keeping the monarch as the on/off switch is easier than dealing with the headache of choosing a President.

One of the things I’ve seen with current junior staff is that they have grown up with computer text for everything, which makes reading non-OCR text very difficult and a learned skill for them. Since I work in a field with scanned handwritten documents, this makes their work much slower.

I wonder if the same problem will happen with AI, where future generations will expect a computer to create connections between different documents.