• Hello_there@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    2 hours ago

    It’s ridiculous to think that Harris couldn’t have done what she wanted. Once you’re named the nominee, that’s it. They’re not going to back out.

    • nfh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      23 minutes ago

      If she was unwilling to break from him because of his wishes, even if she was theoretically able, that speaks volumes about her as a leader.

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      18 seconds ago

      The problem was her campaign was largely run by Biden’s people. He clearly was interfering with her campaign and she kept trying to make the most of it.

    • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I mean, that was the line from centrists anytime someone wanted any hope from harris that she might be less of a lapdog for netanyahu than biden was.

  • Lunar_Voyager@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    3 hours ago

    The way democrats talk: “We’re turning the page and letting the daylight in!”

    The way democrats act with a majority: “We couldn’t get any daylight this time, but we did pass these bipartisan flashlights which are known to explode occasionally due to republicans demanding amendments be added to the batteries.”

    • Eugene V. Debs' Ghost@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 hours ago

      “We’ve also means tested the flashlights, so those who recall the time before the great darkness get less of the flashlights, and anyone who has flashlights that explode will be required to have a daily check of their pupils to ensure they’ve been good at not looking at the daylight.”

  • Eugene V. Debs' Ghost@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Honestly, I kinda don’t buy the idea Biden controlled Harris. Biden could have in 2008, but not in 2024. We all saw his term. He could be great, but when he slowed and floundered, it hampered his goals.

    I’m torn between:

    “I don’t think an adult woman would instantly bind herself to an old man, she can have bad ideas on her own.”

    “I don’t think she had everything planned out, she took advice from those around her, and the advice was shit but it’s hard to get anything from outside this POV without getting even worse feedback.”

    But either way, I’m kind of glad that parts of the DNC is admitting fault after royally fucking up a second time and giving us Trump again. But I was also told they learned mistakes from 2016, and clearly they didn’t, and must have fired everyone who did.

    I wish Harris won merely as a stop-gap who is younger and more coherent, maybe could have gotten someone better next primary. Would have been messy and I would prefer anyone else, but not as bad. But it wouldn’t have stopped the fascist uprising we’re having, just keeping the cyst growing until it popped. If Biden didn’t get Trump arrested, I doubt Harris would have, despite her history.

    • Devmapall@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      42 minutes ago

      I wish she had won too. Didn’t really like her but she was miles ahead of trump. I don’t think you should be torn between the two, I think it was both. She listened to some very bad advice and believed the information she had at hand.

    • Helvetica@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      24 minutes ago

      She’s free to run again, but this time she has to win the primary. And that’s unlikely. It’s rare in modern times for someone to lose a Presidential election and get another shot at it, Nixon and Trump are the only two in over a hundred years.

      • Doorbook@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 minutes ago

        You seem to forget what they did to sanders. If they want a specific candidate they will make sure they win.

    • robbinhood@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      4 hours ago

      I want to tell myself that there’s no way in hell they would let this happen, let alone make it happen.

      Then I remember it’s the DNC.

      • Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Kamala or Buttigeig, you can bet on it.

        Seriously, go to Vegas. At least you’ll make money on the end of the world.

        • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Buttigeig is likely going to run given that he is giving up his chance at a Senate seat.

          I feel like Walz is going to run as well. He’s been showing up in national media a lot and seems to be becoming the face of the opposition.

          Newsom seems like he’s going to run as well, but he’s been making terrible choices recently.

          • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            1 hour ago

            Newsom seems like he’s going to run as well, but he’s been making terrible choices recently.

            Yeah, he’s trying to become the preordained nominee by making choices party leadership likes.

  • robbinhood@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    82
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 hours ago

    To be honest, this is just a signal that she probably wouldn’t have been a good leader. Better than Trump, sure, but that bar is so low it’s a tripping hazard.

    She should have told Biden to pound sand after locking up the nomination.

    But we should verify the claim before passing judgement.

    • metaldream@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 minute ago

      As far as I’m aware, Biden controlled most of the campaign money at least initially. either way it’s still a pretty weak excuse for Harris.

      Biden really fucked us in so many ways though, I’m happy to blame him for losing the election as well. I mean he was the one who thought gaslighting us about the economy was a winning move, he put Harris in a terrible position to begin with. Not to mention deciding to run again in the first place, appointing a Trump collaborator as AF, refusing to exercise his power, etc etc

    • MountingSuspicion@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Honestly, her campaign already signaled that. This, if true, just reinforces it. It also reinforces that Biden was a bad leader, which he was.

      Obligatory: I voted for Harris and Biden and dems down ticket every election since I’ve been old enough to vote.

      • Pieisawesome@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Blaming Biden makes sense. Blame the problems on the actual person in charge. Harris wasn’t in charge, she should’ve let Biden take all of the failures of the term, regardless of her position at the time

  • Absaroka@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Just another example of how the Democratic party is only slightly less fucked than the Republicans.

  • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 hours ago

    “Didn’t allow her” what does that even mean, in the context of the campaign? What the actual fuck was she doing listening to ANYTHING from Biden at that point? He was a clear looser. He stepped back from the campaign (after he was forced to, but he did nonetheless). That was an incredibly obvious opportunity for Harris to openly and cleanly split from policies she thought were wrongheaded - but nope, can’t have that. Jesus tapdancing christ.

    Biden’s hubris put us here, I guess. What an unmitigated fucking tool. He sold us down the river and expects to be remembered fondly by history? Fuck that. The title of his subsection in history books will be “The President who Couldn’t Keep the Republic” (a pointed reference to Ben Franklin’s quip at the original constitutional convention).

    • meco03211@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      The last time that happened was 2000 with Bush v Gore. The longstanding notion was that the VP of the current administration should not really “break ranks” with the current administration. It was seen as undermining their boss essentially.

      This was in less fucked up times, mind you. But that at one time was how it was “supposed” to work. Personally I’m a firm believer that “that’s how it’s always been done” is fucking stupid.

      • nfh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        16 minutes ago

        It’s good to understand why things have been done that way. Sometimes there’s wisdom in the way things have been done, and lessons learned by people who paid real costs to learn them. Sometimes the reasoning is so bad that doing things differently for its own sake is a reasonable decision. You don’t know unless you dig deeper, and not digging deeper on things that matter seems pretty dumb

    • arrow74@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      5 hours ago

      The pressure the DNC seems to exert over it’s canidates is insane. There was probably a lot of pressure on her to toe the line. I heard they reigned in Walz quite a bit too.

      Maybe one day the DNC will learn

        • Eugene V. Debs' Ghost@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          3 hours ago

          It’s fucking bizarre that Trump “randomly” ran as a Republican in 2016, and I can recall the fact that the RNC was trying to keep Jeb and Ted Cruz because they thought they would be a better/saner choice, until he had enough votes from the primaries.

          He just kinda came from under their noses until they realized “Wait we like this, he is a dipshit we can buy and he does shit on camera for free press! Free advertising for fascism, score!”

          I wish I had a portal to look at another timeline to see if someone in the DNC just didn’t bother kneecaping Bernie in 2016 and had the general magnetizing force of him looking for all working class people, including those swindled by Republican brainfuckery. Might have been in a better place for America, even for one term.

        • gndagreborn@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          4 hours ago

          ^, I am both interested and terrified to see what the next few years bring. It’s only the beginning, and the ride continues to get even more wild in all the worst ways.

          • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            4 hours ago

            I am living the next 6-12 months with a very sharp eye on the answer to the question “how quickly can I permanently get the fuck out of the country”.

  • ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    I can believe this. She seemed frustrated when she spoke about the Palestine situation, and I picked up a strong subject that she wanted to say more about her objections over Israel’s actions than she did.

    • Eugene V. Debs' Ghost@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I don’t know if I can buy that when the DNC refused to let anyone with even a hint of background from the middle east get a platform, and when a protest at a speech happened, she said “I am speaking.” Not listening, speaking.

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      39
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Yeah, but that didnt bode well for her as a president…

      She was the candidate, crowned with zero primary weeks before the election, with zero threat of being replaced.

      But she stuck line by line to what Bidens team said

      Buden’s team that was Hillary’s team, and before that Bill’s team.

      Kamala would have been an empty suit for the same neoliberal machine and she would have appointed the DNC chair back to that faction so they could influence the primary in four years.

      If Kamala literally had to say exactly what her advisors said when she was literally irreplaceable, she would have been a president in name only.

      Don’t get me wrong, I held my nose and voted D like always, but I knew she was fucking it up, and long term that might have been for the best.

      • chaogomu@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Tim Walz came out swinging, and they instantly sidelined him.

        That alone was enough to say that the campaign was fucked.

        • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Quick, hide Tim Walz, he’s too popular with voters!

          -Neoliberals apparently

          I still want Ken Martin to publicly commit to ending the Victory Fund bullshit tho.

      • RowRowRowYourBot@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        5 hours ago

        “She was the candidate, crowned with zero primary weeks before the election, with zero threat of being replaced.”

        No primary? There was a primary. Biden/Harris won that primary election as Phillips dropped out fairly early. What do you mean by “no primary”

        Had Biden died on the campaign trail Harris would have been instantly the candidate. The situation with him stepping aside isn’t really any different. There was a primary and Biden/Harris won that primary.

        • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          4 hours ago

          No primary? There was a primary

          And the state who literally has a law that they go first had their delegates stripped for not violating their own state law…

          That’s how the “primary” started.

          I don’t think I need to give any other examples after that.

          The situation with him stepping aside isn’t really any different.

          It’s different because DNC leaders, Bidens campaign team, his current admin, and various media organizations (owned by billionaire conservatives) colluded to hide Biden’s mental decline literally since he assumed office and all the way up to the last possible second

          The neoliberals really did a weekend at Bernie’s and no one with the power to stop it gave a fuck because he had a D by his name.

          That is how Republicans became president.

          Quick edit:

          Seriously, the same people we know lied about Biden and used an elderly mentally unwell person as their puppet were still going to be calling the same shit

          How is that any different than what Reagan was?

          I can almost accept some people don’t want them to face criminal charges, but you think giving them the country again would be better?

    • Loduz_247@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Kamala was somewhat of a Zionist, but not enough to justify Israel’s bombings. Because she wants a two-state solution, and if she had been president, she would probably criticize Netanyahu for his actions damaging Israel.

      A strategy to avoid AIPAC considering you a threat.

  • WatDabney@fedia.io
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 hours ago

    I’m calling bullshit on this.

    There’s no possible way that Biden or any of his people could let or not let Harris do anything. They had no actual control over her campaign.

    The only outsiders who had any control over her campaign were the DNC and the party establishment - the same pieces of shit who torpedoed Sanders in 2016 and 2020,.

    I’m 100% certain that this narrative is coming from them, trying to dodge the blame they so richly deserve by pinning it on the senile guy.

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Bruh …

      You realize at the time the Venn diagram of people you’re complaining about was basically a solar eclipse, right?

      And that after that we got a new DNC chair which completely changes the organization?

      You’re literally doing what the neoliberals want and letting them off the hook and blaming our new chair who is more progressive than any other DNC chair in the past 30 years since neoliberalism took over.

      Like, the fight over the party is over, we won…

      Now we have to back the new progressive version of the party or neoliberals will claw it back when no one’s paying attention.

      It’s like hating the Patriots because Bellicheck was an asshole, you’re right, but he’s fucking gone and there’s a new coach.

  • KoboldCoterie@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    5 hours ago

    This is hilarious, because of Biden’s “I’d have won if I was the candidate” bullshit. More like “Harris might have won if I wasn’t hamstringing her”, but okay, sure, Joe. Let’s get you to bed, now.

  • BertramDitore@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Harris was the candidate, not Biden. Being his VP should have been a boon to her, but instead she turned it into her own biggest obstacle. It was ultimately her decision to follow Biden’s directions on this.

    It’s not like the sitting president can order a party’s candidate to take certain policy positions, even if that candidate is the sitting VP. Biden deserves a ton of the blame for our current situation, but Harris was the candidate and she decided to follow Biden’s terrible advice. He’s just the stubborn geriatric who cared more about his legacy than the peoples’ future.

  • halfempty@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Her position regarding Palestine and Israel cost her the election. Many Dems could not vote for her, so they didn’t vote.

    • MountingSuspicion@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      4 hours ago

      I’d really love for that to be the case (enough people caring about genocide to decide an election), but it just isn’t. The data shows that people on the left still came out to vote and she lost a bunch of centrist votes or people who are seen as “low information”/unmotivated voters. Those people don’t care about Palestine. They thought she was weird, or a DEI candidate, or just weren’t inspired to get up and vote for her. I’m not saying she needs to go more centrist, but people like populism and she just didn’t do it.

      • cabb@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        3 hours ago

        I can’t remember the source, but the number 1 issue in every swing state other than Michigan (which had Palestine as its #1) among democrat nonvoters and centrists who voted republican was grocery prices. Most of those states had inflation as their number 2 issue and Palestine as the third. Palestine alone wouldn’t have been enough to swing any state other than Michigan.

        I think its pretty clear that the primary reason Kamala lost because she didn’t present a vision for the economy. She literally just said that the economy is fine. Inflation and grocery prices? Ignore those!

        Inflation maybe shouldn’t have been as big of an issue since it was below 3% and on its way down but it was still a concern for a large number of voters.

        • MountingSuspicion@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 hours ago

          I agree for the most part, but she did have some milquetoast neolib proposals that would have helped. Mostly things already seen in one form or another in Bidens build back better plan, but honestly it didn’t matter. Her rhetoric was weak and her campaign was poorly managed. I saw SOOOO many ads requesting donations (lady, I don’t have money to buy eggs and you’re buying ad space, the optics are bad) and not one of them said anything of substance. I say time and again that Bernie got people to donate time and money they didn’t have because they believed in his message. Kamala had no message. She had some plans, sure, but did not effectively communicate them. They were too little too late regardless, but it felt like her ads were lazy cash grabs that couldn’t even be bothered to give out empty promises.