thats… a lot of staff fucking.
Being bi and partisan doesn’t make her bipartisan.
Someone introduce this woman to barnaby joyce
He’s possibly too busy with Pauline. At Trump’s “parties”
Threeway with Gina last i heard
I dated an audio engineer who has set up for rich people parties, which have included eating sushi off naked bodies and such.
I would be unsurprised if they were abusing barely legal women/men at Trump’s parties
They have a pretty solid track record of not being at all bothered by the age of consent. Or consent just generally
Even the ex-husband doesn’t believe this story so I think I’ll wait for an investigation and confirmation.
She hiring?
Aside from the hypocrisy I don’t really care at all. So she had sex with three adults? Good for her. I actually think it’s kinda sad that she feels she needs to keep it a secret that she likes women. Other than that, she’s a terrible, terrible person, so I won’t be crying any tears for her.
But you know, there’s an actual sexual predator in your Whitehouse, his whole inner circle is filled with Nazis and pedo’s. When compared to all that, Lauren Boebert should get an award for being so… consensual about sex. I hate her hypocrisy, and she shouldn’t be using government money to book hotel rooms for her sexual escapades, but shaming women for liking sex? Miss me with that shit.
What most people here seem to be missing is that she was fucking her employees.
That’s the problem.
There is a massive power dynamic imbalance when you’re a world-famous politician in one of the highest profile jobs available and you start making moves on underlinings. It’s highly unethical behaviour and has been exactly the conduct that caused many politicians to be ousted and even impeached in the past.
While I take your point and agree with the merits of power imbalances inherently muddying the waters of consent, at what stage are we infantilising adults with the capacity to consent? Without knowing the particulars of the circumstances, it’s very difficult to say that she acted in a predatory manner towards these people. In your comment, you suggest the idea that Boebert was the one ‘making moves’ on her staffers. Is there any verified information to suggest this was the case?
My broader question is this: are there any circumstances in which an employee can truly consent to sexual activity with their employer? I worry that answering ‘no’ to that question unfairly infantilises people, while I simultaneously worry that answering ‘yes’ justifies abuse of power to extract sexual favours.
It’s a very difficult puzzle, and one that I would personally argue heavily relies on context and the accounts of those who we fear may have been sexually abused. I’m reminded of the Bill Clinton/Monica Lewinsky saga which posed very similar questions, and to which you’ve also alluded in your comment.
I was just about to point this out.
To be fair, Boebert fucking her employees plays into the hierarchical social structure that conservatives support. The fact they’re her subordinates is probably what makes it okay.
Well the issue is the power disparity there. She was basically these peoples boss. Even if it’s consensual, that’s not really a situation one wants to have. And having someone in power over you make sexual advancements is a huge red flag in any case.
Given she is a political figure, they also left her open to being compromised, which is also something you don’t want to have happen to leaders in government. Given there was $200.000 of hush money paid, I’d say she was indeed compromised.
There’s also the whole hypocrisy part, but that’s par for the course when it comes to Republicans. So while still bad, hardly worth mentioning.
It fits right in with “Preach the New Testament, practice the Old.”
Republicans said they were the party of family values. That is clearly not the case.
Man, she is one horny motherfucker. Handies in the theater, blowies in the office, lesbian sex in the car… damn! Where does she find the time to rail against the LGBTQ community in-between fucking all the guys and gals in her office?
I had a girlfriend like her once. Once.
Oh I think she finds plenty of time for railing
What’s her OF?
There was that rumor that she was straight up selected from a prostitution app profile…
At the time I assumed it was sexism, but that is presumably the only way Ted Cruz meets willing women so maybe it was true after all and girl just loved her work.
It always turns out to be the ones you suspect the most
ugh… again? and what off-Broadway show was it during this time?
How dare you!
Beetlejuice was a Broadway show, not off-Broadway! Though she did see the tour in Denver, not the actual Broadway cast.
Did attend. Wasn’t paying much attention to the stage
At the same time?
in a row?
37?!
Hey, try not to suck any dick on the way through the parking lot!
Yes, thirty-seven
I should rewatch Clerks…
Is it up on any of the services?
fmhy
If you do a google search for the movie, it will show you what streamers are hosting a movie in your country.
But then you’re using Google services.
www.wherecanistreamit.com and www.justwatch.com can give you similar info without using the Google ecosystem.
I’d fuck her.
Never stick your dick (literal or metaphorical) in crazy. It never ends well.
i can’t say this is only time i agree with Dr. Fart, but it may be one of my more shameful concurs.
excited for when she embraces it and goes pro
Yes, but you’d fuck anybody 😉 .
With a name like that…
enjoy syphilis
Same, but probably regret it
Probably one of the few areas where she’s actually knowledgeable. 🤭
Seriously she’d be a real good hate fuck.
“Do you like that you fuckin idiot”
See this is the rise of feminism female politicians can now be sexual predators as well.
If I had a consensual sexual relationship with her (without the power dynamic thing that makes this worse), I’d be paying her to keep it quiet. What an embarrassing person to be associated with.
That’s not what I meant when I said “fuck Lauren Boebert!”
Wait… so when you said “fuck Spez”… oh, no.
I wouldn’t do it with Trump’s flaccid, deformed, child-bite-scarred stump of a chode on a 10 foot pole anyway.
Republicans said they were the party of family values. That is clearly not the case.
Different family values for different folks.
party of family values
Lots of families, value prices!
They never specify which family they take the values from. The de Sades is my guess.
Who am I talking about?
“I value other people’s families…but only if they are 12 or under!!! I’m not bothered if they are a boy or girl”
“I value other families…dogs! Any breed, but I do like the feisty ones.”
“And I value other families couches…leather if possible. It’s easier to clean.”
Feeling more like the Habsburgs
