Can’t we just start with the impeachments already

Wow.

An arbitrator ruled against the corporation that was paying them.

That is the last time they will get work.

TechnologyConnections did a study claiming that the big name powders are enshitifying their products to push you to the more expensive pods.

They promote a full strength powder

https://youtu.be/DAX2_mPr9W8?is=nuoOIO-4qsa9wAZh

It’s about chain of custody

If he can seize ballots then all bets are off

This is very true

14th amendment Section 3

No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.

They just made up some bullshit that said you can’t keep him off the ballot.

Even though we saw him do this on TV

OMG

1. we saw it happen on live TV

2. journalist recorded all the planning that they did on parlor

this was an opening shut case

I agree that Trump was reelected

I do not agree that had Merrick Garland not slow walked the prosecution, that would have been the case

Just because the US is not investigating, this does not mean other countries are not

France is (until Le Pen gets elected)

Keep an eye open for this as investigations proceed around the world

I think the more salient question is:

Why didn’t Merrick Garland?

Chef’s kiss

The shitty part was that the red card was actually bullshit

Odor usually has more to do with clean clothes than the body itself

To add to this comment, people who believe in this philosophy call themselves accelerationists.

Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Accelerationism?wprov=sfti1

Accelerationism is the belief that making existing problems worse is the fastest way to produce a better future.

Depending on the version, that can mean encouraging economic disruption, institutional collapse, political polarization, or even violence because crisis is viewed as a necessary catalyst.

In its most extreme form—used by some white supremacist terrorists—violence is intended to accelerate social breakdown and provoke civil conflict. Less violent versions can still justify ignoring short-term human costs on the assumption that technological or historical progress will ultimately outweigh them.

You literally admit you don’t know what you’re talking about and you get 20 up votes

Damn, this is an echo chamber

The one billionaire good guy!

The report might be anonymous, but there’s a paper trail, and every officer the court that took the actions that caused this outcome need to be disbarred and prosecuted

Username check out

Fuuuuuuuuuuuck

Can’t even comprehend

If you have those skills, you can apply them to yourself. You can make people value your contributions enough to pay you for them. You can convince people to give you the chance to make larger contributions to the company.

If you can get that kind of experience and are technical enough to identify an emerging idea, you can convince a banker or investor to help you start a business.

I’m retired from a technical field. I know lots of folks that hold this opinion.

I have also seen excellent technologies and fortunes wasted because technological experts thought that marketing and finance weren’t important. They thought that because their technology was better than anything else, people would want it.

People are busy. Marketing is required to give people a chance to understand what they might get if they spend their time and money on your product.

Finance and leadership are needed to build and fund the human machine that is the company producing the product.