• gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    112
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    9 months ago

    I’m probably just speaking for myself, but this particular dynamic actually makes me feel better about supporting Biden. I think Joe Biden himself is a contemptible dumbass whose policy imagination is stuck in a past that never even actually existed, but I think he’s had to surround himself with a lot of staffers in their 20s 30s and 40s who aren’t so terminally dense on things like Israel and student loans and reproductive healthcare and labor unions, and they can actually make him evolve and be a little bit less of a boomer than he otherwise would be. Hopefully they’re able to keep the pressure up.

    • DigitalTraveler42@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      71
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      9 months ago

      Exactly, Trunp would be purging these people from his administration, and wouldn’t be holding Israel back at all, if anything Trump might send troops in or order some strikes himself just to feel like he’s partipating in the slaughter.

      Biden has shown that he’s movable on issues whereas Trump would just take a sharpie to those issues, or worse, far worse.

      • Verdant Banana@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        9 months ago

        “movable on issues”

        he took office and immediately backtracked on campaign promises firing staffers, not defending healthcare, told rail workers they did not have a right to ask for better, and not to mention the rest and the recent

        campaign promises that went against his and his vice’s whole career so big surprise there

        • cheesebag@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          The International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers says:

          “We’re thankful that the Biden administration played the long game on sick days and stuck with us for months after Congress imposed our updated national agreement,” Russo said. “Without making a big show of it, Joe Biden and members of his administration in the Transportation and Labor departments have been working continuously to get guaranteed paid sick days for all railroad workers."

          And I hate to tell you this, but if you want a president who doesn’t back down on any campaign promises, you will never, EVER be satisfied. Because realistic promises don’t inspire voters & win elections, optimism does (at least for Dems, GOP prefers fear)

        • Syringe@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          Follow up on the rail workers thing. I had to eat a bit of crow on that one myself.

      • Nix@merv.news
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        9 months ago

        How is he movable? All he’s done is send more weapons and spread disinformation/propaganda even israel said were lies…

        Joe Biden being the one doing it just causes liberals to protest less than If trump was doing it. Same thing with Covid, Biden laughed at masks and took his off while sick and has done nothing to stop the pandemic that is infecting over 2 million people in the US a day and killing 1,000 a day. That’s multiple 9/11s a week and yet liberals act like it’s nothing cuz it’s not trump in charge anymore.

        • cheesebag@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          … has done nothing to stop the pandemic…

          Bullshit.

          A year in, experts assess Biden’s hits and misses on handling the pandemic:

          Goal 1: Restore trust with the American people- Experts say on this front, the Biden administration has not made much progress, although they acknowledge how challenging a problem it is.

          Goal 2: Mount a safe, effective, comprehensive vaccination campaign- His administration made huge strides in expanding vaccine supply and access, experts say.

          Goal 3: Mitigate spread through expanding masking, testing, treatment, data, workforce and clear public health standards- This is an area where the administration has fallen short

          Goal 4: Immediately expand emergency relief and exercise the Defense Production Act- The president scored an early win signing the American Rescue Plan into law- “this administration in particular has been quite skillful with respect to its use of the DPA.”- Still, “the main message here is too little, too late on masks and testing,” From Turner’s perspective, the current supply problems have less to do with underutilized federal authority and more to do with the virus itself

          Goal 5: Safely reopen schools, businesses and travel, while protecting workers- Schools continue to be a contentious issue the Supreme Court blocking the White House’s attempt to require vaccination or tests for employers with 100 or more workers.

          Goal 6: Protect those most at risk and advance equity, including across racial, ethnic and rural/urban lines- The administration has been “moderately successful” on this front, says Benjamin of the APHA.

          Goal 7: Restore U.S. leadership globally and build better preparedness for future threats.- This “is certainly an area where the administration promised big but has fallen short so far,” she adds.

          You can criticize the Biden COVID response, which seems to be a mixed bag. But you absolutely cannot say he’s done nothing. And he’s certainly moved us in the right direction, unlike Trump who was the single largest driver of coronavirus misinformation.

      • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        21
        ·
        9 months ago

        Movable? Why the do you think his staffers are quitting? Genocide Joe has no plans to change course precisely because people like you support Genocide.

        After bombing 20k people he bypasses Congress to send more bombs to israel. He is not movable. He is a pure Zionazi.

        Israel tried to get Trump to start a war with Iran when he was in power, and Trump didn’t. There is little chance that Trump would do much worse than Biden.

    • fidodo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      9 months ago

      I don’t think he’s a dumbass, I think he’s a man in his 80s that hasn’t/can’t adapt to the times and needs more convincing than should be necessary. I honestly think his heart is in the right place, but he’s just too damn old.

  • conquer4@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    70
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    9 months ago

    Here’s the annoying thing about our system: so what? If you stop supporting Biden, and trump gets re-elected, congrats, you now have an extreme Isreal supporter in office who would give nukes to Isreal. By being fed up with the current administration, you would have shot your own cause by withdrawing.

    • PugJesus@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      9 months ago

      Deeper than the system, unfortunately. A supermajority of Americans are still extremely pro-Israel. Some for batshit insane religious reasons, others for reasons of ignorance. A few out of pure malice, one presumes.

      • AnneBonny@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        Americans are pro-Israel because, for the past 75 years, we’ve been taught and told that all the Arabs and/or Muslims want to destroy Israel and we are the only country that can prevent that from happening.

        For the majority of Americans, it is not religion or ignorance, it is simply political dogma.

        • PugJesus@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          20
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          9 months ago

          America wasn’t particularly friendly towards Israel until the 70s, though.

          And to be fair, much of the Arab world has wanted to destroy Israel.

          We have little sway in that matter, though. Israel survived before we lent them assistance, and they were much worse off back then, and their enemies much more determined.

          • NoIWontPickaName@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            13
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            9 months ago

            Good! The let’s stop selling them weapons, withdraw our carriers, and let them deal with the consequences of their actions on their own.

            It is really fucking easy to do what you want, to be ho you want, with no repercussions when you have the worlds strongest military backing you.

            The little fuckers wouldn’t have enough balls to do what they have been doing without our backing.

            For fucks sake, they are so scared and cowardly that they are shooting innocent hostages, with their shirts off, hands up and a white flag in them.

            • FanciestPants@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              Cutting off all military aid to Israel would definitely make us feel better for a minute, but I think your post accurately points out that what comes next is likely to be much worse. One genocide may turn into a different genocide as the regional powers decide it’s open season on Israel. Then once Israel is facing probable eradication, the US is faced with allowing the destruction of Israel (including Israelis that oppose the current actions of their state), or getting back into a conflict, now with many more regional forces, and possibly nation states involved.

              I absolutely agree with you that the IDF’s actions are abhorrent and consistent with war crimes as I understand international agreement (which is only layman’s understanding), but Bibi appears to be playing chicken with the entire population of Israel, and Biden may have blinked after considering the consequences.

              • NoIWontPickaName@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                9 months ago

                Those are the consequences of their actions, let the smart ones get out and the war hawks get what they paid for.

            • PugJesus@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              9 months ago

              Good! The let’s stop selling them weapons, withdraw our carriers, and let them deal with the consequences of their actions on their own.

              I mean, shit, you won’t find any disagreement from me. As far as I’m concerned, Israel should be treated as a hostile actor to the US.

              The little fuckers wouldn’t have enough balls to do what they have been doing without our backing.

              Don’t know about that, though.

        • someguy3@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          9 months ago

          Older Americans inherited the post WW2 mentality to support Israel. And they couldn’t say anything critical for fear of being called anti-Semitic.

          Younger Americans don’t have this and laugh at the attempts to call criticism anti-Semitic. (The exception are religious people who support Israel because Bible something.)

          It’s a generational thing. That’s why support for Israel is falling.

    • fidodo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      9 months ago

      That’s what primaries are for. I agree the system isn’t perfect but so many people ignore the primaries then wonder why their party never changes. Again. That’s what primaries are for.

      • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        “Rely on the primaries” - people who love that the party opposes progressives in primaries harder than it opposes Republicans in any context.

        • the post of tom joad@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          Just to expand a bit on what your already said, those arguments conveniently ignore the DNC et al fight hard against the left, outspending any progressivess who attempt to unseat the right-leaning Dems. Then with their center-right party safely entrenched they tut-tut at us wanting the Dems to help the working class, describing the tilted table they’ve set up as “a big tent party”

          Yeah, it’s a big tent, and we aint in it

  • watson387@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    9 months ago

    Biden is going to hand the 2024 election to Trump on a golden platter if he doesn’t change course, even though everyone who isn’t braindead knows Trump would be doing exactly the same.

      • cmbabul@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        I don’t even know if I would say significant anymore, we’re gold fish in this country

        • gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          27
          ·
          9 months ago

          It’s almost like we’ve undermined our public education system, built an economy that keeps most of us pretty close to survival mode most of the time, and we’re constantly deluged with commerical and political advertisements that are designed to manipulate and mislead us or something

        • Candelestine@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          9 months ago

          Unfortunately it’s extremely geographic. We’re pretty singular, but which “single thing” you get varies tremendously depending on where you are.

          If you live in San Fran, “everyone” is a certain way. If you live in the rural heartland, “everyone” is the opposite.

          On top of that, the number of people that can and are willing to speak the language of both sides is vanishingly small, due to the rhetoric and style of one side being extremely distasteful to the other.

          I think ranked choice voting is probably our best, most realistic shot forward, by reducing the importance of the hard liners in the primaries.

          • Shiggles@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            The problem is it isn’t “both sides” when neither side really represents, I hope, most people. Ten years ago “republican” didn’t really have to imply mouth breathing fox news fanatic, and “democrat” continues more and more to mean “everybody that would be considered left in a european country but also the moderate right that don’t want to gas immigrants”. Any “side” has several if not dozens of wildly different and often barely compatible ideologies, thanks to our two party system.

            To speak to a republican you have to simultaneously be prepared for them to casually support some horrific extremist idea, just be a sexist and/or racist insecure twat, or to just want less of their money going to government programs they don’t agree with.

            Ranked choice voting, or frankly any voting style besides first past the post is the only way to fix that.

            • Candelestine@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              9 months ago

              That’s a good point. It’s important to remember that each party is a huge coalition of different voters with different priorities, and there’s even independents in the middle.

              That said, I still think it’s important that we stop hiding from and shunning what we perceive as evil, and start facing it down and punching it in the gut. With words, ideally, while we still can. It is possible to simply help people to see things in new ways, it’s just hard and unpleasant.

    • Neato@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      9 months ago

      The Israel situation won’t swing the vote. Most people support Israel blindly or don’t care enough to be knowledgeable.

      • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        A couple of recent polls asked “What is the most important issue to you?”.

        About 30-35% said “the economy”. Only 1-2% said “Israel/Gaza”.

        • krashmo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          9 months ago

          Why would anyone expect it to be much higher than that? People are selfish and that’s not entirely unreasonable when it comes to politics. It makes no sense for a foreign policy position to be the determining factor when deciding who to vote for, especially when we have so many problems here at home.

          • nonailsleft@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            Lol the US has been supporting Saudi Arabia through their war on the Houthis for 3 consecutive administrations which killed checks notes 85.000 children alone

            Some libs who just recently learned less than half about the conflict in Palestine and think it’s Kony 2.0 smh

              • nonailsleft@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                9 months ago

                That’s 85.000 children starving over a 4 year period alone. 380.000 total civilian deaths over 8 years.

                Did you see a lot of protests to call for a ceasefire? Do you feel their deaths are less worthy?

                • NoIWontPickaName@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  9 months ago

                  OK, so what do you need to do is take it over the last three consecutive administrations like you said.

                  That starts with Obama for eight years, trump for four and Biden 43 going on four.

                  Say what you mean and mean what you say.

                • NoIWontPickaName@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  Maybe you should lead with the real numbers instead of the fucking gotcha numbers.

                  Congratulations you got your got your moment that you specifically set up

      • paris@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        9 months ago

        Young voters are significantly impacted by this issue and they carry a lot of momentum. I think the people saying that this won’t sway the vote are really discounting how important that momentum is.

        • Neato@ttrpg.network
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          How are young American voters impacted by the war in Gaza? I understand they care about it, but impacted sounds like it has more than morale effects.

      • shikitohno@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        9 months ago

        I wouldn’t reduce it to a binary. I think there’s a pretty good chunk of the population who are anti-Zionist and pro-Palestinian, but aren’t reachable as swing voters. They’re to the left of the current Democratic Party and might vote begrudgingly for Biden, but wouldn’t vote for Trump under any circumstances.

        • Reptorian@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          Anti-Israel, pro-Jewish, and pro-civilian Palestinians here! I will vote begrudgingly toward Biden, but will vote for candidates that do not support unconditional support toward Israel and they have naunced opinions while still supporting Jewish people and Palestinians.

    • june@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      Trump would be trying to send troops. Both to Israel and Russia. I’m convinced of it.

  • shikitohno@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    This is great and all, but it doesn’t mean too much if Biden doesn’t actually care to correct course. There have been plenty of protests already showing the current policy is increasingly opposed by significant sections of the population, yet they’re only making the most token efforts at any sort of real change in their stance towards Israel. If tens of thousands of people turning out for protests on the matter don’t get it through the heads of Biden and other Democrats that this stance is untenable, I don’t see why we should expect he’ll suddenly start listening for a few staffers sending a stern letter.

    In all likelihood, they’ll hold the line on this, then when Democrats lose the next elections, they’ll blame it on racists, antisemites, more leftist candidates spoiling their chances, or literally anything but doing some reflection and realizing some of their long-held positions are now deeply unpopular with a significant portion of their voter base.

    • blazeknave@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      Any chance Dems are 4d chess enough to be laying it on thick now, level Gaza quickly, create enough buffer to pull out a few months before Nov, count on the collective memory seeming to be a few weeks these days?

    • NoIWontPickaName@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      18
      ·
      9 months ago

      Vote blue no matter who( even if they are actively aiding the suffering, killing, and destruction of innocent people, children and their homes)

      • fidodo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        9 months ago

        Vote for Blue no matter who, and fight for change in your party in the primaries. That’s why we have them.

        • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          That’s why we have them.

          When we feel like it. And have argued in court that we don’t have to run them fairly.

        • Nix@merv.news
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          9 months ago

          lol except we don’t have them anymore because they removed them for Biden had to be the only candidate able to run this election to prevent Trump from stopping elections and committing genocide. Ironic

        • Aldehyde@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          9 months ago

          Vote red so they can do the same thing while making life worse for Americans as well

        • FanciestPants@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          I don’t belive the blue and red positions are very far apart on this particular issue. This is certainly an issue that justifies passionate response, but unless there is a candidate from the red that states that they would take a different approach more aligned with your values, I would look to other issues where the parties have made their differing positions more clear to decide which is more deserving of your vote.

          • fidodo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            9 months ago

            Fight for change in your party in the primaries. Nobody fucking votes in the primaries. That’s where intra party change happens. If Democrats lose in the general what do you think happens? They’re gonna get more left wing? No, they’re going to move to the right because they’re going to think that’s what they need to do to win. They need to win in the general and you need to change the party in the primary.

            • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              9 months ago

              Fight for change in your party in the primaries.

              Yeah, I’ve seen what the party does to progressives in primaries. This is just gloating.

            • shikitohno@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              9 months ago

              How has moving more to the right been working for them? They need to realize already that they’re out of touch with much of their voter base. Maybe they don’t run more progressive candidates in purple states as a strategic call, but they could try something new in more liberal cities, at least, and start moving the conversation. I can’t be the only one where my primary options straight up suck. Oh, yeah, change things from within, where I have Corporate Democrats #1 and #2, running along with the Working Families Party candidate whose only concession is something weak like “Maybe we should increase EBT eligibility, but means test the hell out of it so it’s a full time job to manage your application.”

              The current Democratic party basically claims to represent everyone to the left of Mussolini at this point, and that’s too big a group to be a functional political unit. Unfortunately, we’re basically screwed on a third party being viable, as it would depend on the two current parties taking action to change voting procedures in a way that could only hurt them. Democrats and Republicans are both content to sit on their hands right now, as they know that no matter how unpopular they may be, how badly they might lose elections, it’s only a matter of time before the other guys piss people off enough and the pendulum swings back to them.

  • iterable@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    At minimum the US could be a shield and help. Bring food and medical supplies as well as lifting out critically injured. You would also think if the US military was in there Israel would not be so reckless.

  • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    9 months ago

    I’m sure they’re all Russian children who don’t know how government works engaging in astroturfing because they want Trump to win.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    “It’s pretty extraordinary levels of dissent,” said Josh Paul, a career official working on arms sales at the state department who resigned in protest in October, of the mounting signs of discontent.

    “I cannot stay silent as this administration turns a blind eye to the atrocities committed against innocent Palestinian lives,” he wrote in announcing his resignation from his position as adviser to its policy planning office.

    But the acute situation in Gaza caused by Israel’s ongoing operations, which have killed more than 22,000 Palestinians, along with risks of famine and severely restricted medical care, have overshadowed any purported shifts in US policy.

    This week, the secretary of state, Antony Blinken, will travel to the Middle East “to underscore the importance of protecting civilian lives in Israel and the West Bank and Gaza”.

    Paul, the senior state department career official who resigned in protest in October, said he’s in contact with several people currently in government who are thinking about leaving over Biden’s handling of Israel.

    Habash’s resignation, coupled with the 3 January letter from current campaign staff, comes amid fears that Biden could be losing important members of his base as the 2024 presidential election begins in earnest.


    The original article contains 1,064 words, the summary contains 199 words. Saved 81%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!