A bipartisan group of six senators on Sunday called for Donald Trump’s administration to “immediately reverse course” on a plan to purchase diesel from Russia as part of an effort to lower high fuel prices.

Trump shocked lawmakers when he announced on social media Friday that he struck a deal with Russian President Vladimir Putin in a phone call. He said Russia will immediately supply more than 300,000 tons of diesel to the American and global market, followed by an additional 500,000 tons in November and 1 million tons “immediately thereafter.” Russia will deliver an additional 3 million tons “within a short period of time” after that, he wrote.

Four Republican senators and two Democratic senators signed onto the statement released Sunday in protesting the deal. They said the administration failed to consult with Congress or submit any explanation to justify its decision as required by statute.

  • melsaskca@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Oh oh. trump is going to be in big trouble for not consulting congress. This is the one thing that they absolutely will not stand for. /s

  • arc99@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Imagine if he just struck a real deal with Iran. This crisis, of Trump’s own making would resolve itself.

  • Shayeta@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    7 hours ago

    It’s performative. Russia doesn’t produce nearly enough disel to satisfy US needs.

    This is so that when Ukraine inevitably blows up more Russian refineries Trump can withdraw whatever support is left for Ukraine.

      • danc4498@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        19 hours ago

        Literally it was a message they sent. Next I suppose they’re going to do something about it.

        • nightwatch_admin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          18 hours ago

          Look I get it, but for the moment let’s be glad these six are doing something… a lot more than the absolute nothing - or bootlicking - the others are doing.

          • Serinus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 hours ago

            I’m sure it was intentional (and absolutely fine) that there were more Republicans than Democrats as well.

          • danc4498@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            17 hours ago

            I’m skeptical of any republican that has had the opportunity to keep Trump in check, but has not. This feels like an attempt to make them look better before rhe midterms.

          • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            17 hours ago

            let’s be glad these six are doing something

            No. This is LITERALLY the least they can do apart from nothing. And 94 senators aren’t even doing THAT much.

            That’s as worthy of celebration as Mitch McConnell completing a sentence without having a stroke or Hakeem Jeffries neglecting to call a common sense progressive candidate with more popular policy positions than himself “dangerous” or “extreme left”.

            • nightwatch_admin@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              15 hours ago

              Yeah it’s this bad, I know. It’s not that I disagree (although it’s probably dangerous to even do this under Trump), and I’m definitely not celebrating. Still, I believe complaining should now start with the other 94.

  • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    17 hours ago

    Alternative headline:

    94 senators in favor of or indifferent towards heavily sponsoring the war crimes of a geopolitical adversary.

    It’s not as snappy but more relevant to the state of things

    • Sunflier@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      12 hours ago

      94 senators in favor of or indifferent towards heavily sponsoring the war crimes of a geopolitical adversary.

      94? Dems hold 47 seats and their actions have been carte blanche in favor of Ukraine. So, their position is well known. Its 49 Republican senators that act indifferent.

  • Deacon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Here is my thing. How in the world is JD Vance not quietly building support for the 25th? Like that might be the only thing that could save them in the election.

    But even if they still plan on cheating, Trump is literally nothing more than a liability at this point.

    • dhork@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      If Vance was plotting this, the 25th is not the way to go. He would need to get half the Cabinet on board, and then when Trump inevitably challenges it it would take 2/3 vote in both houses to toss Trump out.

      It would be much better if Vance simply built up support for an impeachment vote. Trump is doing a ton of things that would have gotten anyone else booted by now. And then all that’s needed of a simple majority in the House with no Cabinet input. Still 2/3 of the Senate, but that might end up being only about 15 Republicans after the elections.

    • spongebue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      14 hours ago

      I mean, if we knew he was doing it, it wouldn’t be so quiet. Too much of his cabinet (which would need to vote for it) are unwavering Trump sycophants, but maybe there are enough not-Pete-Hegseths that he could pull it off.

      But for Vance’s own sake, he may be best off waiting until after midterms/inauguration in case he needs to cut any deals with the next Congress.

    • timbuck2themoon@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Probably because Vance has to be one of the most unpopular people ever. Seriously, they’re hanging on because of the cult like devotion to trump. Nix him and go to Vance? Their support drops from high 20s to sub 10s

    • Logi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Wouldn’t doing that with less than half a term left mean that he could then only be elected for one term? So to maximize his own (and Thiel’s) potential power, he’d want to do it right after January 20th. IANAL and obviously IADNACL.

    • thallamabond@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      44
      ·
      19 hours ago

      In 2025, distillate (or diesel) fuel consumption (excluding biodiesel and renewable diesel) by the U.S. transportation sector was about 2.94 million barrels per day, or about 123 million gallons per day.

      123,000,000 gallons per day. Diesel weighs 7 pounds per gallon so 861,000,000 pounds or 430,500 tons per day.

      This first shipment will not cover 1 days fuel cost. But what it will do is give a big pile of money to Putin.

      • peopleproblems@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Wait that means…

        Thats about $500m of diesel purchase.

        Essentially that’s a transfer of $500m cash to Putin. Putin is collecting dues.

    • halcyoncmdr@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      19 hours ago

      But it’s enough for them to blame the Dems when things aren’t magically fixed after they win in the Midterms. The idiots eat that shit up because they have absolutely no idea how a national economy works. Republican economic policies are consistently bad for everyone that’s not in the 1% and yet they vote for them all the time because they’re told told policies are good for them, regardless of the reality they deal with daily.

    • tburkhol@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      19 hours ago

      I feel like that’s the worst part of this: he’s undermined what had been a reasonably unified international campaign for what, like 2 days of diesel?