Why *less than half

The best outcome is purging the scum

Neither. The city shut them down in direct response to it coming into the open that they shared data with federal border patrol, claiming a contract violation.

I’m so happy my city took down our flock cameras

That’s categorically not true. Strikes with end dates are utilized as shows of force by actual, serious unions, to put pressure on the company without the same level of economic damage. They should never be the end goal, or the final strike, but they can be a good starting place to measure support.

This is a way that if it’s successful, they can plan much longer strikes in the future successfully and better know how far they can leverage power.

Pritzker is fairly good.

Having only people who are willing to do atrocities in the military is not going to magically make it better lmfao, nor will it stop it

Anyone who thinks their party isn’t is likely not thinking straight. The scale probably depends on the party, but I think you can be reasonably sure they all do it

Ok but like those things are also necessary for cooperating in space.

But the technology in cars now-a-days comes from materials that literally do not exist in the continental USA.

It would not be hard to rebuild that technology with the wealth or nation has. It is a choice, and was intentionally made that way, and pretending otherwise is to take at face value the narrative the rich weave

Top 10 reasons to be in a union:can yell at donald without getting sacked

Politely, I’m in a very diverse union. You’re underestimating their like for America

A lot? Nationalism is deeply involved with labor on relation to protectionist policies and whether to have them or not. That’s not to excuse how much they’ve fucked the department in the ass though

More like. It doesn’t matter. A few hell fire missiles are not making any meaningful difference in a fight between the usa and Denmark, so you might as well sell them to hedge your bets if you decide not to invade

The idea that rules are less important than lives is exactly a part of the process that causes things like the war on terror.

Unjust rules should be broken, but rules should not be broken just because lives are at stake.

Basic rights > rules > lives

You assume those processes were ever democratic to begin with

A whole hell of a lot more democratic than one mayor deciding things. I’m from Chicago, I’m well aware of issues with the process. But I think you’re overstating it to say it’s wholly undemocratic

If legislative can’t do anything. It shouldn’t be done. Gridlock is no excuse to bypass democratic processes

Still a victory. While horrible the precedents set by using military are worse than ice. But this is no time to stop

Abolishing copyright exclusive and only works if you abolish money with it. Otherwise you’re only benefiting the largest corporations, despite what you think, it won’t be the small guy winning

Not when I’m listening to videos 4 hours a day at work, not really

When copyright dies so rich conglomerates can make money by monetizing out toys and collectibles and theme parks from smaller creators content without paying a dime back to them? Copyright is beneficial. Copyright is good. It needs reform, yes, but don’t mistake that with the concept being bad.