Deacon

He honors 250 years of the USA by definitively losing the war he definitively started for no definitive reason.

Discovery is going to be wlid

What’s crazy about this, at least to me, is that you have in Emily Blunt one of the best at using and changing her voice in her acting. I always think of her and Tom Hardy as the best in this area. It’s like they are voice acting on top of their normal acting. That’s a poor way to describe it, but it’s the best I can do.

I don’t want to take anything away from any other aspect of Emily Blunt’s toolkit as an actor. But using AI for any aspect of her voice acting is like trading a Bentley for a fucking Daewoo.

Crazy is kind of his schtick from what I have seen.

IIRC one of the big evolutionary advantages of Homo Sapiens as a predator at least was stamina - or our ability to run for comparatively long periods of time.

I’d love to know what you think Lemmy points are. I take the signals that are given, and so we’re done. Peace to you.

Israel CAN be wiped off the map without murder. Will you admit to that?

Will I admit to that? What kind of question is that? Of course I will ‘admit to that’, since you’ve backed me into a rhetorical corner.

Now, since we’re admitting things. How often do you think the historical use of the term is describing a non-violent process?

Fuck Zionism, and Free Palestine but the language of erasure is just too close to genocide for my comfort, as cathartic as the thought may be in the moment, and I’m hesitant to normalize it.

Other people don’t have that sensitivity and that’s fine. You do you.

I’m truly not disputing your point, and I don’t assume that you support genocide as a matter of belief.

But the top level comment started with the assertion that we ‘need to erase israhell off the planet’ which is a genocide. Your point was deployed in response to someone saying, in so many words, ‘maybe we shouldn’t do a genocide because not all people of a nationality believe the same thing’.

Then you come in with, in so many words, ‘yeah, but most of them do’ - as a further reason to…not do a genocide?

What point is your comment serving other than to soften the reason not to do a genocide?

You qualified and minimized the statement of the person you were responding to, and they were responding to someone espousing genocide.

The person you were responding to expressed the idea that a big number of Israelis oppose genocide and colonialism - in response to the suggestion of genocide.

You seem to have assigned yourself the role of making sure to clarify that it’s actually a very small number of people who maybe should not be genocided, so it walks and talks like a duck at this point my friend.

Answering a genocide with a genocide is really not it though.

Glad I got one with open source firmware before it all goes totally to shit

Keep going, I am already invested in the world you’ve created.

BE SURE TO DRINK YOUR OVALTINE

Thank you. I didn’t even know this was one of the definitions until seeing your use of it and looking it up. Appreciate you expanding my understanding.

Being in the military in the US is pretty much a humiliation ritual at this point.

FTFY

I have never seen affable used in this way, presumably as a pejorative. Do you mean this in the sense of them being benign?

I’m genuinely not criticizing; I love learning new things and my question is genuine.

Genuinely, we haven’t always been this divided.

Until around 2000 when that election turned news into a 24 hour entertainment. Citizens United 10 years later and the seeds of our division were well and truly planted.

You forgot

• literally profit

They are once again doing what they accuse the other side of doing - importing votes.

If that’s true the punishment should be removal by hand without anesthetic. Not one single esthetic.