• rpl6475@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    59 minutes ago

    Companies are so removed from what users want, they only focus on what shareholders want to hear and don’t consider that users will hate it.

  • cmrn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    3 hours ago

    That’s like a cigarette brand marketing themselves as the most cancer-causing.

    • ArchRecord@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 hour ago

      Chrome is relatively limited in scope compared to, say, a user on an instance of degoogled chromium just using the same Google services along with all the other browsing they do. The extra data that’s gathered is generally going to be things like a little more DNS query information, (assuming your device isn’t already set to default to Google’s DNS server) links you visit that don’t already have Google’s trackers on them (very few) and some general information like when you’re turning on your computer and Chrome is opening up.

      The real difference is in how Chrome doesn’t protect you like other browsers do, and it thus makes more of the collection that Google’s services do indirectly, possible.

      Perplexity is still being pretty vague here, but if I had to guess, it would essentially just be taking all the stuff that Google would usually get from tracking pixels and ad cookies, and baking that directly in to the browser instead of it relying on individual sites using it.

  • joel_feila@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    Ok how long after this browser goes live till we hear it being used by the FBI to track criminals.

  • futatorius@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    9 hours ago

    When using my current browser, any guess as to how often I’ve said to myself “I need a browser that spies on me more”?

        • qwerty@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Only if you are going tor only. Im no expert but imo there is no better general purpose browser right now, both in terms of usability and privacy. Default firefox is a joke, librewolf is decent but it’s fingerprint protection relies on blending in which is difficult to achieve with it’s small userbase or if you have a lot of extensions and it’s identity separation is done manually through containers while brave uses randomization for fingerprinting, that doesn’t have this issue and it does site containerization between all tabs automatically. Ungoogled chromium is just brave without all the privacy benefits, mullvad browser is just tor browser without tor, which might be useful in some cases if you are using multiple browsers but I wouldn’t main it , and it has the same problems as librewolf. Opera is Chinese spyware, Vivaldi is whole ass operating system with a browser functionality, everything else is dead or not ready or not any better so yeah… I’ll be sticking with brave until something better comes along. If someone here knows a better alternative please let me know in the comment.

        • qwerty@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          3 hours ago

          It’s a great browser especially if you go through the settings and disable the things you don’t need, but the people here don’t like it because the CEO donated $1000 to anti gay marriage bill in 2008. There were some other controversies like injecting brave’s referral codes on crypto exchanges if you were signing up for an account and allowing bat donations to creators that didn’t sign up for it but all of that has been remedied.

    • Trihilis@ani.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      9 hours ago

      They don’t want people to use it. They want Google to give them a big bag of money so they can integrate it into chrome.

  • Lovable Sidekick@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    10 hours ago

    “Help us improve your User Experience by trying as hard as possible to induce to spend money you don’t have on crap you don’t need.”

  • Coyote_sly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Can’t sell reams and reams of customer data if you don’t have any customers.

    tapforehead.jpg

  • Psythik@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Damn, and I really liked them too. It’s the most accurate LLM I’ve tried and it even accurately cites sources as well (unlike Copilot, which just makes shit up and then cites an unrelated source).