After any political debate, it’s customary for news outlets to do some fact-checking, sometimes on the spot. During CNN’s post-debate coverage, anchor Dana Bash caught up with GOP presidential candidate Vivek Ramaswamy and confronted him with facts.

Ramaswamy had quite a newsworthy night – maybe not the way he would have wanted to be covered or exactly the way he wanted to be covered, with many fiery moments while he was on the debate stage. Bash, who dove right in with “Where do I even start?” started by asking Ramaswamy about why he attacked everyone including the Republican National Committee and NBC, which aired the debate that gave him a lot of camera time. He responded with his frustration with his party and then launched into the fantastical theory that President Joe Biden was not going to be the Democratic candidate in 2024:

  • admiralteal@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    89
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    She didn’t “shut him down”. She tried to get in a point across and he barged right on along unimpeded by her and continued peddling more bullshit and conspiracy theory.

    The truth means absolutely nothing to a conservative. Evidence means nothing when you never cared about reality in the first place.

    • conditional_soup@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, except I feel like he’s a standard deviation further beyond even MAGA and Trump. He’s the guy in the room with casual conspiracy people who starts racing about how the moon is a holographic projection. He’s an unironic parody of the entire MAGA movement, and I know a few MAGAs who like him and think he’s smart*, but not enough to pick him over Trump.

      *Basically, if you can talk faster than they can think. Ramaswamy has a very Ben Shapiro gish-gallop style of just saying bullshit way faster than anyone can deal with it. To somebody who’s already MAGA, it sounds “truthy”, so a lot of it just slides right past any filters. To somebody who’s not MAGA, though, building a second, even stupider wall between us and Canada was an “Oh, wait, you’re serious, let me laugh harder” moment.

      • SkybreakerEngineer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        People said the same thing about trump on 2016 when he got on the “vaccines cause autism” train. This isn’t some outlier, it’s exactly where the base is.

      • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Beat me to it. I was going to compare this dipshit to Shapiro - he seems to be intentionally lifting his style. Shapiro is a stupid person’s idea of a smart person because he just firehoses out a bunch of bullshit so fast that it’s hard to keep up. And of course, the Gish Gallop is something so many conspiracy theorists/conservatives do all the time, because they just love their logical fallacies and making a mockery of real debate and intellectual pursuits.

  • Rentlar@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    56
    ·
    1 year ago

    His entire tactic is to do the Ramble-swamble, string together a bunch of incoherent, misleading, vague, and wrong statements together and shoe horn “Biden is bad” in there. Conservatives would fawn over him if they could get over the racism.

    • zib@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      I always called that the Shapiro technique, but Ramble-swamble is so much better.

  • Thorry84@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    What a disgusting man.

    “I’m just calling out corruption in the democratic party!” “There is no evidence” “No, but if there were, I’m calling it out”

    So you’re basically full of shit, but all his followers hear is he’s calling out corruption in the democratic party.

    • Telorand@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      I believe it is an established maxim in morals that he who makes an assertion without knowing whether it is true or false, is guilty of falsehood; and the accidental truth of the assertion, does not justify or excuse him.

      —Abraham Lincoln

    • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      And constantly trying to punch down in the most harmful way possible, and of course, to “own the libs”.