I’ve come across an interesting question on the threadiverse that was asked two years ago and still hasn’t been answered.

What do you all think is an acceptable time frame for responding to unanswered posts?

Is there a general rule for when it’s too late to give an answer?

    • MelonYellow@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      Yeah, plus new comments don’t bump the thread up. Well if it’s a dead thread. Comment away!

  • falseWhite@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    Even if it won’t help the original poster anymore, someone else will come across the answer via Google search.

    Nothing worse than googling for an issue, just to find that someone had the exact problem and no one answered, or the OP goes “figured it out” without providing an answer lol

  • cecilkorik@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    4 days ago

    The problem with “necroposting” in a forum is that it bumps the topic to the top as if its new again, some people think its actually new, and it usually starts the whole discussion over again, stealing attention from topics that are actually new and relevant. That’s why people hate it.

    It doesn’t work like that on the threadiverse. The only person who gets notified is the person whose post you are replying to. It does not get “brought back to the top”. It only exists if someone searches for it, and that doesn’t trigger the same “viral” flood of comments as it does from being bumped to the top of a forum.

    Some people don’t understand the distinction, and have evolved their habits in forums that frown on such things, so they continue to frown on it here without thinking about why they hate it so much. They will still hate it if you do it to their posts, and that’s perfectly valid for them to feel that way, even I feel that way sometimes, but you don’t have to abide by their rules. In summary, fuck the haters, necro everything, at worst you’re simply leaving your wisdom for some future searcher.

  • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    4 days ago

    Context.

    Some obscure question that’s been unanswered for months?

    Sure, why not.

    A political article that’s a couple days old and has a shit ton of comments tho… Yeah, it’s weird for people to jump back into those.

    But the absolute worst that will happen is someone down votes and blocks you. Most likely they ignore it, maybe ask what you’re doing

    It’s not a big deal.

    • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      I imagine a lot of those ones with shit tons of comments from a couple days old are just people who are sorted by active instead of hot, so it keeps them at the top of their feed when they log in. Then you find pinned comments at the top of subs, which someone may accidentally respond to even if they are sorted by something else.

      I figure so long as they are trying to answer a question, and not criticize someone’s point, should be fine.

    • DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      Its only weird if its an hour old account commenting on a 7 day post with bad faith arguments and whataboutisms, or randomly accusing the OP/commenters of dubious claims like “GENOCIDE SUPPORTER” or “PEDOPHILE”. (I saw a new obvious alt replying to a 5 month post for no reason lol, browse the modlogs… its fun)

  • scytale@piefed.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    4 days ago

    Unlike reddit where the turnover of content is very quick (i.e. don’t bother commenting on a popular post if it’s more than 2 hours old), lemmy/piefed is slower and a lot of people still sort feeds by active and scaled. So commenting on a very old post can very well still be noticed by other people, let alone the person who posted it.

  • unknownuserunknownlocation@kbin.earth
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    4 days ago

    I submitted a song that I couldn’t find the name of a long time ago in hopes that someone could ID it. About 15 years later, someone replied with the name of the song. It definitely brightened my day to have a nice surprise like that.

  • StrawberryPigtails@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    4 days ago

    If it’s a technical issue, go ahead and answer it if you think your answer will help someone in the future. Someone may be having that exact problem and have found the post via search. This has helped me more times than I can count when working on projects.

    Non technical topics, depends on the platform and subject. I’d say use your own judgment.

      • StrawberryPigtails@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 days ago

        My opinion, that would fall under technical. Your reply might not be useful to that teacher or the student that she was trying to help, but might be useful to the next teacher or student that runs across the post.

        In all my years I have never found anything as poorly documented as how people’s minds work.

  • Fyrnyx@kbin.melroy.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    None as long as the answers are insightful or helpful.

    Maybe a consideration if the answers are just bullshit.

  • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 days ago

    Whatever timeframe I’d reasonably expect people to read and respond to my comment. For Lemmy, I’d put that at a day.

  • DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    I generally look for posts:

    • Top voted within 24 hours, usually the first 2 pages, sometimes more,
    • Sometimes I browse posts with a specific community, mostly check the past 3 days, I generally reply to anything with 3 days and don’t care if its 1 minute ago or literally 72 hours ago.
    • After that, I usually don’t comment, unless I’m really interested, and its within 14 days
    • or if its a old post/comment saying stuff like “mark my words” and then something relevent happened recently in the news, and I might comment and be like “Lol you were right/wrong” regardless of how long ago.
    • If its a post I already viewed and mentally invested in the conversation, I’d re-visit new comments, I will reply there for up to 7 days since time of post. Or if its an ongoing debate in the comments, I can go on forever if it’s a good faith debate.
  • ℕ𝕖𝕞𝕠@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    I still get replies to questions I asked on reddit most of a decade ago that never got fully answered, and I really appreciate the people that make that effort.

    • sk1nnym1ke@piefed.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      Didn’t reddit have a rule that old posts cannot be answered and are automatically archived after a set time?