• PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    1 year ago

    The realistic conclusion to that would be Trump spilling Top Secret info to North Korea. If not willingly, then via torture. But let’s be honest: It would probably be willingly.

    • socsa@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      1 year ago

      Honestly, I don’t think he has the awareness or attention span to be an accurate mole if he’s limited to working from memory.

      • Daft_ish@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Lol absolutely. Can you imagine Trump trying to reciete something from memory?

        “So the document said bigly assets were all all over the country. My uncle, college professor in the nuclear — Hillary! Can you believe that, folks? Hillary. Johnathan Trump, went to MIT did the thing, this and that. Tremendous, it was tremendous this government secrets I am telling you now.”

        • Techmaster@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          And as he’s saying it, his voice just keeps getting softer, like he’s telling you a bedtime story.

      • Zippy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Real question. What information could he provide that would be of real value? Inside policy but I suspect if the policy makers knew he was spilling the beans, they would adjust as needed.

        Technical information? I doubt he barely knows how to use a smart phone much less give details on a f35.

        I would be curious what the intelligence community would consider high risk if a past president flipped.

    • Nollij@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      This actually highlights one of the problems (as a strategy, ignoring humanitarian concerns) with torture- whether or not someone will break has nothing to do with whether they have real, useful information. Once they break, they will say whatever they think their captors want to hear.

      The primary (strategic) alternative is to befriend them; convince them you’re on their side. A tactic that has been shown to be extremely effective on Trump. He’ll gladly spill whatever he thinks he knows as soon as they say something nice about him.

    • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Good point. We should maybe abduct both of them, and turn it into a reality tv show. Like The Truman Show. but real.

      • root_beer@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Nope, he would absolutely thrive on something like that; anything less than consignment to the dustbin of obscurity is too good for him.

        • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          He absolutely wouldn’t thrive on being forgotten by everyone except his jailers.

          He feeds off the attention.