• Asafum@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 years ago

      Seems like the people capable of saying “I don’t know” are the only ones with consistency.

      • Papergeist@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        I’ve consistently been of the opinion that a felon shouldn’t be able to become president.

        • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          22
          ·
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          That could open the gates to one party weaponizing the justice system and jailing the opposition. That’s the only reason I don’t support such a requirement.

          I would answer IDK in the poll

        • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          2 years ago

          And I’ve consistently been of the opinion they should barring certain crimes. I hate this felon’s guts, not a fan of most felons to be honest, but a vandalism felony as a 19 year old? Drug dealers? And that’s not getting into felonies I’m questionable as to if they should be crimes.

        • Asafum@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 years ago

          +1 for angry commies message. I believe that’s why we would actually want to be able to elect a felon.

          It’s up to the people to use their brains (…lmfao) and try to understand if it’s really just a political hit or if they’re a legitimate criminal. Of course in a world of Faux News, Newsmax, and Facebook Karens, figuring out what to believe is becoming increasingly more impossible as is the intent.

          It’s getting old but it’s insane how many comments this fits so I need to say it again: I FUCKING HATE PROPAGANDISTS!

          The problem of billionaires and propagandists are one in the same.