• SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    11 months ago

    If the individual states don’t allow him on their ballot although he hasn’t been found guilty by courts or congress how long is it before the pre-election period is just red states eliminating blue nominees?

    This is bad precedent.

    • LilB0kChoy@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      although he hasn’t been found guilty by courts or congress

      It’s not a legal trial, it’s not a law, it’s an amendment to the constitution. No finding of guilt by a court is required.

      This is bad precedent.

      Blocking a presidential candidate from a states ballot because they violated the 14th amendment by engaging in an insurrection is bad precedent? Your argument is a little silly, Republicans already work in contradiction to the laws and constitution, doesn’t mean Democrats or the American people in general should not follow them.

      • SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        11 months ago

        What’s stopping the republicans from doing the same to Biden?

        That’s what the people who are taking offence to what I’m saying are not seeing.

        • LilB0kChoy@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          11 months ago

          What’s stopping the republicans from doing the same to Biden?

          Did Biden participate in an insurrection? Unless some very big news went under the radar Republicans can’t disqualify Biden under the 14th amendment. That’s what you’re not seeing.

          Your argument is don’t uphold the 14th amendment to the constitution because Republicans might try to unlawfully disqualify Biden from the ballot? I don’t believe you don’t understand how absurd that is.

    • RunningInRVA@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      11 months ago

      On what grounds would they be removed? They can’t kick somebody off the ballot if it won’t stand up in court.

        • RunningInRVA@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          11 months ago

          Thanks. It’s a legit question though. A rogue Secretary of State could try but you know it’ll land in court and the Judiciary will decide based on the merits of the case.

          Personally I support this precedent being set. We should uphold our laws to protect our country. If a Democrat ever lands in a similar situation then this precedent will be good to have had set.

    • Chaser@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      11 months ago

      But then the argument is we shouldn’t follow the law because the GOP might break it

          • SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            9
            ·
            11 months ago

            I told you my reasoning, I clarified it and if you’re looking for an argument about it you’re not getting it from me.

            Have a nice day and thanks for the conversation.

            • Chaser@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              11 months ago

              I just asked a non confrontational question. If you can’t deal with that, that’s your business

            • Chaser@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              11 months ago

              I just asked a non confrontational question. If you can’t deal with that, that’s your business