Summary

Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard fired National Intelligence Council Acting Chair Mike Collins and Deputy Maria Langan-Riekhof after they contradicted Trump’s claims about the Venezuelan gang Tren de Aragua.

A declassified NIC report found no Maduro-directed effort behind TDA’s U.S. activity, opposing Trump’s justification for suspending Venezuelan migrants’ due-process rights.

Whistleblowers accused the officials of undermining Trump. Gabbard is relocating the NIC from the CIA to her office.

Critics warned the firings suggest intelligence is being shaped to suit political agendas, not facts.

  • mrbutterscotch@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Well yes, there is no such thing as an unbiased news agency. That doesn’t exist. But the bbc is in no way comparable to American News such as cnn and fox news

    • punksnotdead@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      11 hours ago

      Did you read any of my sources?

      The BBC doesn’t outright say red is blue, because they’re not idiots and their target audience aren’t idiots, but to state they’re not comparable flies in the face of reason. They have shown on multiple occasions to push agendas, to the point that the criticism page on Wikipedia is huge. They are not the bastion of good journalism that they’re held up to be by the general public.

      The Guardian has it’s flaws too of course but that is a far far better source than the BBC. It doesn’t claim to be unbias, it doesn’t lie to you that you’ll hear fair and even coverage from “both sides”, it doesn’t give preferential treatment to the ruling party in government because of fears its funding will be removed.

      Edit: What’s scarier? An obvious bias source screaming nonsense 24/7 or a supposed unbias source subtly distorting facts when it suits them? Which will have more influence on public perception? Which is a better propaganda machine?

      • Auli@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        11 hours ago

        Well it’s already proven the biased source yelling at you 24/7 is the better propaganda machine.

        • punksnotdead@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          10 hours ago

          Proven? Is it? Care to provide some sources or argument beyond just an assertion? An administration does not an empire make.

          It’s intriguing that posts with references get downvoted but posts without get upvoted. Great critical thinking Lemmy users 👍