• superkret@feddit.org
    362·
    2 个月前

    Nothing, at all.
    Some things you can’t do easily in Mint, like create snapshots automatically and boot into them when something breaks.
    But it’s all Linux and freely available software under the hood, and the lines between configuration, customization and forking your distro are blurry.

  • thejevans@lemmy.ml
    24·
    2 个月前

    You can’t have your entire system configuration in a repository of plain text files, which has lots of advantages, but it’s not worth caring about unless you feel excited to get into it.

    • oxomoxo@lemmy.world
      31·
      2 个月前

      Why not? Isn’t this the whole concept of Bash Script, Ansible, Terraform, etc… I mean it can be as simple as a git repo that pulls down an install script then syncs your dot files. What am I missing? If you’re referencing Nix, you can also have that on Mint.

      • thejevans@lemmy.ml
        4·
        2 个月前

        Yeah, I’m talking about not just Nix, but NixOS. Nix (the package manager) can do a lot, but NixOS + disko + home-manager can literally be all of the configuration for your machine from drive partitioning through to dot files. Throw in nixos-anywhere and impermanence and you can have an insane amount of control over all of your computers.

        Ansible, Terraform, Chef, etc. do have some overlap, but the main difference is that those tools iterate through the system modifying it piece by piece and NixOS is declarative.

        If something fails in some of my bigger Ansible playbooks, it could mean 30 minutes of just running through all the steps again. I could probably break it into sections, but then I have to worry about making sure they all get run when things get updated. In my NixOS install, it’s way faster, I can roll back to a previous state, and troubleshooting is way easier in my opinion.

        • oxomoxo@lemmy.world
          1·
          2 个月前

          Ah alright. My point is OP is asking what can be done in other distros that can’t be done in Mint and your answer was have the entire configuration be in plain text. I completely agree that if you want that kind of reproducibility NixOS is the most refined, well established, and best way to handle this. However to answer OP I would say this is possible in Mint but just much more painful.

  • OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml
    23·
    2 个月前

    Serious answer? XFCE doesn’t support multiple monitors with different refresh rates. So that.

    Some of the other answers (like Meta (aka Windows Key) not working for shortcuts) can be hacked around, but unless you switch to a DE that supports Wayland, you will never have stable multi refresh rate differences on multiple monitors.

    • uzay@infosec.pub
      4·
      2 个月前

      I’m not a fan of the xfce UX at all, and multi-monitor support still has a lot of issues (under Debian 12), but I am pretty sure having different refresh rates is possible

    • thingsiplay@beehaw.org
      2·
      2 个月前

      Serious answer? XFCE doesn’t support multiple monitors with different refresh rates. So that.

      That’s more of a limiation because of X11. KDE and Gnome do not support different refreshrates on multiple monitors as far as I know. Its the main reason why I never used multiple monitors. But on Wayland, this issue is solved. So if XFCE is ported to Wayland, they should also get this support for free I guess.

    • dubyakay@lemmy.ca
      1·
      2 个月前

      Maybe I’m missing something but I am running xfce4 and have per-monitor refresh rate setting.

    • 0x0@programming.dev
      1·
      2 个月前

      XFCE doesn’t support multiple monitors with different refresh rates.

      I have an LG TV and an old Asus monitor, i’d wager their refresh rates differ but i can’t confirm atm.

  • GravitySpoiled@lemmy.mlEnglish
    22·
    2 个月前

    You can’t easilyy switch between different inages like on an atomic fedora system.

    Do you have to switch now? No.

      • GravitySpoiled@lemmy.mlEnglish
        1·
        2 个月前

        You can create a ublue version in a few hours if you’re down to it. Creating an inage isn’t that difficult 👍🏼

    • thingsiplay@beehaw.org
      9·
      2 个月前

      Technically he or she has access to the AUR, but through website.^^ On a more serious note, one could install https://github.com/89luca89/distrobox and manager multiple package managers. Because each package manager is in a container, they do not interfere. I never used it, but imagine it like Flatpak, but actually using the package manager from the distribution (including access to AUR). And specific applications and programs can be “exported” to install them like a normal application, so you can access it with a single appname.

    • exu@feditown.comEnglish
      6·
      2 个月前

      One could compile pacman and all the build tools if they really wanted to.

  • ProgrammingSocks@pawb.social
    14·
    2 个月前

    Use Pacman as your package manager, or something. Linux is Linux. If you use a mainstream distro it should be 90% similar to all other distros. You don’t really have to worry about FOMO when it comes to Linux.

  • UnfortunateShort@lemmy.world
    10·
    2 个月前

    Compared to Arch(-based): Accesing the latest packages. It’s not impossible, especially if you go for Debian testing repos, but it’s definitely extra work.

    Compared to special-purpose distros (i.e. gaming, portable, high security/privacy, pen-testing): Whatever their special purpose is will usually be harder to achieve.

    Compared to huge corpo distros (SUSE/Fedora and derivatives): Ease of more intricate setups and maybe some security testing.

    Compared to Ubuntu: Paying a corporation to not withhold security patches from you.

  • poo_22@lemmygrad.ml
    7·
    2 个月前

    With NixOS you can upgrade your entire OS and if you don’t like it roll it back like nothing ever happened. You can also replicate your entire machine by copying your configs over to another computer, running the install, and then copying over any files you have in your home folder and you will have reproduced your desktop.

    You can also very easily use a different version of a packaged app by adding an override in your config. This is useful if you want bleeding-edge features or if something is broken. Also every package is also a development environment, so you don’t have to worry about setting up a dev environment to hack on stuff.

  • confusedwiseman@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    4·
    2 个月前

    In my experience, not much, but I’m a marginally functional newbie. Mint manages things for you fairly nicely and has been the best, it just works with out messing with much/anything. (At least for my hardware)

    I managed to get gnome working smoothly on mint and have been happy with it. I started and returned here since I last ditched windows as a native OS.

    The only thing that has made me consider distro hopping from mint is AUR on arch and gnome, though I’ve been successful so far.

    Part of trying the distros that are more advanced and give you more explicit control and configuration is the sense of accomplishment and it makes you figure out how and why things work the way they do. It holistically builds your velocity in your understanding of Linux. (Or gnu whatever that nuance is).

    If your machine has enough resources it is super easy to host VMs of anything you want to try. You can try them all, and it won’t cost you anything but time!

    • Nilz@sopuli.xyz
      7·
      2 个月前

      If you feel like you need/want software from AUR you should check out Distrobox. It can run any distro on top of your installation using Docker under the hood, but it tightly integrates into your system so with little effort you can run AUR programs from your launcher as if they were natively installed on your Mint.