• idiomaddict@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Of course we were affected. The last year I lived in Connecticut, I paid $13k for healthcare, as a mostly healthy person in my 20s.

      • Rapidcreek@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        You would have paid the same with Univeral Healthcare, but if you worked f9r a Connecticut insurance com0any you’d be out of work.

        • idiomaddict@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 months ago

          Other countries with universal healthcare don’t pay nearly as much as Americans do and not every industry needs to be saved. Health insurance companies are not even the biggest insurance employer in Connecticut, the vast majority of people in Connecticut had a net loss in not getting single payer through.

          • Rapidcreek@lemmy.worldOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            2 months ago

            A lot of other countries own their entire health care structure. Hospitals, the whole lot. That isn’t part of Universal health care and is the big component to lower costs overall.

            • idiomaddict@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              2 months ago

              Some, but a lot don’t. Even if that was the only way to reduce healthcare costs, it would be a great application for eminent domain. Luckily, everyone else has a better solution than ours.

              • Rapidcreek@lemmy.worldOP
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                2 months ago

                The US is a big country in size and population. So, efforts in this area aren’t easy and very expensive. If you maintain everyone to have insurance, as with the ACA, you can lower about 1/3 of health care costs. Move to Universal Care, you’re looking at almost 2/3. Nationalize the entire Healthcare structure and you’ll see almost 3/3. I don’t really see that last one happening in my lifetime. It took a lot to convince people the ACA was good for them.

                • idiomaddict@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  So we agree that Joe Lieberman voted against the interests of his constituents (the difference between the 1/3 and 2/3 of savings).

                  • Rapidcreek@lemmy.worldOP
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    3
                    ·
                    2 months ago

                    I agree that Joe was listening to those constituents who wanted to keep their jobs. And, if the public would have given democrats more of a majority in the Senate he wouldn’t have been an issue.