• Lasherz12@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 months ago

      Walz is the perfect solution for this excuse. He passed progressive policies weekly in the governorship with a 1 seat majority. There are plenty of reasons to be excited about this ballot that are new. You could of course argue the same thing about early Obama, but I trust Walz.

      • newfie@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        What evidence is there that Kamal will even try to pass an agenda that is similar to what Walz did in Minnesota?

        I think Walz is the most progressive governor in the country and would love to see his policies implemented on a national level. What evidence is there that Kamala’s administration will even attempt to enact those policies? She has been light on policy, with the exception of supporting Israel and building the wall via the bipartisan immigration bill that the Dems are now running on.

        I’m assuming Tester wins in Montana and dems have a blue house and 50/50 senate. But even with that, idk why we would presume she would be as progressive as Walz

    • someguy3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      When do they win? They need all 3 of House of Representatives, Senate, and Presidency to do much of anything. And they’ve had that for, drumroll please, 4 of the last 24 years. Or 6 years of the last 44 years. They basically never win. So they are forced to compromise and then they go to the center to find voters.

      And when they do get all 3, Obama passed the ACA, Biden passed green energy, student debt, drug price control, etc,. And the thanks they get is to then lose the midterm elections. Thanks voters that don’t show up!

      • newfie@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Biden did historically well in the midterms tbh. If it wasn’t for gerrymandering and a population capped House, Dems would still have complete control of Congress

        • someguy3@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Yeah but it still kneecaps them. He can’t even do a sweetheart border deal without the House.

          • newfie@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            Yeah my point is that voters did show up. Dems did historically well in 2022 for an incumbent party

            Its just that the structure of our electoral politics favors rural areas and gerrymandered districts. Which currently means the red team benefits. Which isn’t the fault of recent voters

    • Leviathan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Honestly, voting for representatives was a hard sell back then but after 2020 young people actually showed up to vote between presidential elections. Uniting the party is easy if all the elected party members are progressives.