• NaibofTabr@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      That link is an academic paper about social norms in general. It has nothing to do with Nancy Pelosi or insider trading or government corruption, which is why I said:

      directly relevant corroborating information

      You are drawing inferences based on assumptions. You haven’t provided anything that constitutes evidence.

      • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        As I said in my comment above. We have one US Government, we cannot run experiments on it. I don’t know if you’ve ever worked in statistics or even just taken uni level statistics, but your desired level of proof is simply ridiculous and unattainable.

        Here, I have given you a mountain of data that paints a pretty clear picture but no, I can’t “prove” it was Pelosi - just like you can’t prove it wasn’t ancient aliens.

        I really do hope you’re trolling because this beyond silly.