I think I honestly replied to the wrong person, because I agree with you 100%.
She’s a statesman with enormous experience and political clout (at least had) with a solid ideological foundation in and conviction of democracy and rule of law. These days that goes a long fucking way. What they did to her is probably only eclipsed to what they did to Monica Lewinsky. They just demonize people relentlessly until they become a persona non grata in anyone’s mind- just look at everyone even in this thread shitting on her, they’ve been swept up in the same propaganda dragnet as the right, they start repeating right wing propaganda talking points yet would be incapable of mentioning a single thing she did politically or any of her propositions.
Is she flawless? Lol no.
Is “flawless” something we expect from leadership? Lol YES!
And if they aren’t flawless, then they are just as bad as the bottom of the barrel, therefore it makes sense to vote for the bottom of the barrel instead.
I’m sure we’re not far from them bringing the Clinton’s back as well
I’d take Hillary over Harris any day.
Why?
I’ve never seen Kamala show the level of intelligence, gravitas, or understanding of world events that Hillary has.
I think I honestly replied to the wrong person, because I agree with you 100%.
She’s a statesman with enormous experience and political clout (at least had) with a solid ideological foundation in and conviction of democracy and rule of law. These days that goes a long fucking way. What they did to her is probably only eclipsed to what they did to Monica Lewinsky. They just demonize people relentlessly until they become a persona non grata in anyone’s mind- just look at everyone even in this thread shitting on her, they’ve been swept up in the same propaganda dragnet as the right, they start repeating right wing propaganda talking points yet would be incapable of mentioning a single thing she did politically or any of her propositions.
Is she flawless? Lol no.
Is “flawless” something we expect from leadership? Lol YES!
And if they aren’t flawless, then they are just as bad as the bottom of the barrel, therefore it makes sense to vote for the bottom of the barrel instead.
¯\(ツ)/¯
In what context? Both are poisonous to any campaign.
Hiliary has experience in office but is very much a warmonger and happy to attack populations campaigns in Detroit need to attract.
If in terms of being in office she’d fit more in the GOP with what she campaigned on in her presidential runs.
Nah, Hillary is a bad choice because the GOP has been working on anti-hillary messaging since the 90s.
If she got the job, she’d probably be one of the best presidents in US history.