• Noxy@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    That’s a lot of “could” and “would” doing a lot of work while ultimately still in support of fascist bigoted bullshit.

    All hypothetical shit when the actual, currently working concept of marriage already exists

    • sharkaccident@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Now you lost me. Are you saying the current system of marriage works and at the same time insisting I’m the one against same sex marriage?

      • Noxy@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Yes to both. Your original suggestion is to strip me and my husband of our marriage.

        • sharkaccident@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          No, I’m trying to get your family recognized nationwide by using a different term to remove the barrier to rights and privileges. I’m separating church and state. I’m suggesting the freedom to get “married” by whatever religion accepts people for who they are. I’m saying the government should recognize when two people decide to contribute to society as one.

          You can do both is my point. Get a certificate of union from the government (establish rights) and then go get married by whomever you want. Again problem solved.