floofloof@lemmy.ca to politics @lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 years agoSupreme Court action already upending January 6 rioter sentencings, being looked at by Trump defensewww.cnn.comexternal-linkmessage-square34fedilinkarrow-up1192arrow-down16
arrow-up1186arrow-down1external-linkSupreme Court action already upending January 6 rioter sentencings, being looked at by Trump defensewww.cnn.comfloofloof@lemmy.ca to politics @lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 years agomessage-square34fedilink
minus-squareAnneBonny@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·2 years agoThe article does a poor job of communicating what the case is about. The questions presented: “Did the D.C. Circuit err in construing 18 U.S.C. § 1512© (“Witness, Victim, or Informant Tampering”). Which prohibits obstruction of congressional inquiries and investigations. to include acts unrelated to investigations and evidence?"[1] https://ballotpedia.org/Fischer_v._United_States
minus-squareNightwingdragon@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·edit-24 days agodeleted by creator
minus-squareFedizen@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·2 years agoI would not call any supreme court “sane” but there was a period where there were some basic standards.
The article does a poor job of communicating what the case is about.
https://ballotpedia.org/Fischer_v._United_States
deleted by creator
I would not call any supreme court “sane” but there was a period where there were some basic standards.