• AnonTwo@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      So you have no domestic policies you care about? Like being able to vote against genocide in the future? Cause Trump has a lot of policies in mind that would seem to prevent doing anything about that later down the line.

      I can’t even call it shortsighted because it’s not like the other option is even going to help things short term. If anything the other option is just going to be even worse. So I don’t really get the stance other than a nihilistic “let everything burn” response.

      • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        Forget about the Nazi genocide, think about your student loans!

        It’s like watching poor billionaires not giving a shit about anyone but themselves.

    • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      Ελληνικά
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Voting to support a little genocide, vs not voting and allowing a big genocide… Now where have I seen a philosophical problem like that before…

    • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Better than not voting and ending up with a lot of genocide… Or maybe you want to go tell the people of Gaza that you’re an accelerationist and just had to let things become worse in order for them to potentially get better?

      • bhmnscmm@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I see… Voting in support of the current genocide is an act of compassion. Right.

        As if voting blue, red, or not at all are the only options. I’m voting for the person who I decide deserves my vote. Not in support of the status quo.