People want the Fediverse to grow because we can see how much damage corporate walled gardens have done to our society, and we care about others who are still trapped in a cycle of corporate abuse. We dream of a better world and see the massive potential benefits a decentralized global communications protocol hold for humanities future.
Yeah I get that but any big tech company can just buy the entire fediverse if they want to. They can offer instance owners money to sell their instance. They can put Lemmy developers on the payroll with 500k salaries, or replace them. They can add things like allowing people to make money by posting stuff. Suddenly we have influencers, and while they may not appeal to you, they will appeal to the millions of people who like them on Instagram.
I may not be right about the details but I’m just painting a picture here. You are letting your dreams about a better world totally cloud your judgment here. Corporations can take this place over easily and they will be really interested in that if the active user count becomes big.
People say “then we just move to another platform”. Yeah, like the one we have now? And try to get it big? So we can end up again having to move away from it…
The only way to win is to stay smallish and under the radar. Be a fringe interest for a couple of million active users.
Lemmy runs on an open protocol which cannot be “bought”, known as ActivityPub. All platforms that use ActivityPub can theoretically interact and federate with Lemmy. This means that if something like lemmy.world was bought, we don’t have to “move away from it”, we just spin up another instance and then federate with it while the other instance doesn’t have to deal with corporate things like ads.
Lemmy is Free and Open Source Software licensed under a version of the GPL. This means that it can never be fully restricted, and if corporate interests were to theoretically “buy” the current maintainers, it can be forked to a version without corporate meddling, which can then federate and interact with all the current instances anyway, due to how ActivityPub works.
There’s a lot of instances. You can’t buy the entire fediverse as you will have people with principles.
Now don’t get me wrong, they can absolutely meddle, but not purely through money or hostile takeovers, due to the decentralised nature of the Fediverse. No matter what, the Fediverse will always exist as it is, all the huge platforms can do is try to make it so people don’t want to use the Fediverse and move to their platforms instead.
To try and give an analogy, it would be like a company trying to “buy the web” - they literally cannot. Of course, we do have some huge players who control a lot of the web and attempt to dictate standards for everyone else, but there is no one iron fist that rules over everything, and there’s many small players and communities all over the place.
I really appreciate this explanation. I was a bit worried about corporations (Meta) taking over myself and now I know it wouldn’t be a problem. I’ve been online since the mid 90s but never learned the ins and outs of how it all works especially when it comes to FOSS.
I mean there is still the very real threat of niche irrelevance. If enough instances are aligned with corporations, the embrace, extend, extinguish can happen. You really want Independent instances to have at least a 1/3 of the population. Threads is gonna make that extremely tricky when it federates.
No, they wouldn’t. They’d just own some servers. And in the meantime, other instances would appear. To own the fediverse you’d have to completely control every web server in existence, halt production on new web servers and somehow find a way to make open source software licenses invalid, buy then patent, then remove all the existing fediverse software types, somehow repeal ActivityPub as a standard and then make it all illegal across the entire world.
Yeah I get that but any big tech company can just buy the entire fediverse if they want to. They can offer instance owners money to sell their instance.
…and they can turn around and create another instance
They can put Lemmy developers on the payroll with 500k salaries, or replace them.
Lemmy devs don’t really “own” the code, since it is free software. It can be forked at any time by anyone.
They can add things like allowing people to make money by posting stuff.
…and existing fediverse instances can just not federate with instances that push that bullshit
I’m sick of people acting like they’re superior and only they deserve the Internet because they think they’re intelligent. The “brainless masses” have just as much right to use the internet as you do. Stop trying to gatekeep the Internet.
More mildly put, people are diverse, which is a great resource.
I want to follow communities about a wide variety of topics. Some appeal to intellectual, tech-savvy people, others don’t.
If the platform is deterring to the later group, my experience suffers because I lack content in these areas.
People can use their brains in many more ways than understanding technology. Just because a person is not good in navigating technology does not mean they have no brain.
For example, I’d love to see more going on in communities about performative arts, philosophy, activism, regional cultural events. Occasionally, I like to peek into bubbles which are completely different from my own.
With power comes responsibility. I see it as the responsibility of people who understand technology to make it accessible to those who don’t.
I would even go further and say that I also want to interact with people who just want to be silly or want to share their bizarre views about things. Variety is the spice of life. As long as these communities can remain separate (like how the fediverse has communities), then the more the merrier.
I honestly don’t think something having a higher barrier to entry is gatekeeping. Ofcourse you shouldn’t try to make things actively more difficult but I don’t think lemmy is doing that anyways.
I think most people prefer their drivers and games work out of the box on a system they won’t break by accident. Linux won’t be the solution until it caters to a better class of idiot.
Maybe you don’t get on Instagram or facebook much,
but content for brain-dead people exists, And every time I’m left in shit as nothing is documented but only commented unnecessarily with onomatopoeias and emojis.
Exactly. We need people here. The strength of Reddit at this point is that, for any interest you might have, no matter how niche, there will be a sizeable community on Reddit that knows a lot about it and is yearning to talk about it. Outside of tech and science adjacent topics, that’s simply not really the case here.
Sure, sometimes I want to talk about new developments in tech. And other times, I want to talk about Carly Rae Jepsen’s upcoming album, The Loveliest Time, and how I’m fucking stoked to see her in less than a month.
The bigger a social platform gets, the more synergy it spawns. That’s what adds utility to a social platform.
I don’t think anyone here wants it to be ‘the next big thing’, but I do think a lot of people (myself included) want to see it become ‘one of the next big things’. As in…we want it to become big enough to be a viable alternative to the proprietary walled-garden corporate establishments that have become the current standard.
More choice = better, and for as long as this platform remains small and elitist (referring back to your 3rd sentence), it will never truly be a viable choice. There’s still a lot of engagement I’m required to use Reddit for - and I hate that - and the only reason for it is we just don’t have the community size needed (yes, it’s getting closer every day) to be that viable alternative.
You are young it sounds like. If Lemmy becomes that size, all good things about it goes away, and we get ads and corporations moving in to profit from it. That turns the entire thing into the same shit as everything else.
It happens over and over and over again in tech. It’s a pattern that all older people knows about because we have lived it.
So I hope Lemmy stays small. Bigger than now, sure, but not big enough to attract corporations.
As toxic as Reddit is, it is a huge wealth of information if you can search and parse it. It also encourages small niche topics that wouldn’t get any attention without a huge audience to draw from. If Reddit is no longer going to feed that role, I hope SOMEPLACE becomes that kind of place in the future. If it’s the Fediverse nothing stops instances from creating smaller communities within it. Could be best of both worlds. Or it could ruin it. I guess I don’t know.
I think the Fediverse model has a really strong advantage compared to past platforms. Corporations are always going to have a profit motive, and that will necessarily eventually make the user experience worse. With how easy it is to move things around in the Fediverse, there’s a meaningfully lower risk of that since the lock-in factor is reduced. I’m sure we will see monetized corporate instances (see, Threads), but if that experience eventually gets intolerable, it’d be relatively easy for users to jump ship without drastically changing the experience.
It’s not perfect, but we’re in a better position I think.
(Messaging from mastodon server) I think so too. Your posts may not follow, but the freedom to move from one server to another, and the freedom to follow posts and info from other servers means if threads wants me to join they’d need make the experience better than anywhere else, or I can leave and still follow anybody I was following before.
Okay see, this itself shows exactly what I’m saying. I’m on Kbin, you’re on Mastodon, and we’re talking on a Lemmy instance. This is genuinely stupid cool.
No. But it’s humorous to me that you immediately go there for anyone who disagrees with your take. I’m >5 decades.
If Lemmy becomes that size, all good things about it goes away, and we get ads and corporations moving in to profit from it. That turns the entire thing into the same shit as everything else.
Sounds like massive speculation. Especially for an open platform system that anyone can self-host. If you don’t like ads or paying for service, light up your own instance and self host. That is, by definition, why lemmy works the way lemmy works. I hate to accuse you of making shit up, but you are making shit up.
It happens over and over and over again in tech. It’s a pattern that all older people knows about because we have lived it.
I’ve probably lived through more of this than you have. I’ve made my career in the tech industry and have been at it since 1991. Again, you keep trying to imply that you somehow have more experience or more time in industry just because I disagree with you. That’s awfully pretentious.
So I hope Lemmy stays small. Bigger than now, sure, but not big enough to attract corporations.
That’s elitist. And it’s self-defeating. Sounds like you’d be happy just joining a few email list servers…because you aren’t going to get any more value than that out of the self-inflicted handicap of keeping community sizes tiny.
You seem to have equated what you think is superior age and experience with superior wisdom. You’re wrong on multiple counts and committing numerous logical fallacies while you’re at it. Larger platforms are more successful because they have the community sizes needed to make even niche topics relatively engaging. There’s a critical mass of users needed to make that happen. Lemmy is a few orders of magnitude too small for that yet, but that’s what it will take to be a viable alternative. I’m not suggesting that Lemmy should get so big that it causes places like Reddit to disappear…just that it gets big enough to be a viable alternative. If it’s not big enough to be a viable alternative, then what’s the point? To just be an elitist circle jerk for for a few people discussing a few popular topics somewhere outside the mainstream so they can think they are some kind of techno-hipsters? What a waste.
We disagree with eachother for sure. I’m also about your age, and I havent seen any platform become big without also becoming user hostile. Google, Youtube, Reddit, Meta, you name it.
It seems that you believe that just because Lemmy is federated, it will be able to not be affected by Threads and it’s users. We will see. I doubt it.
It seems that you believe that just because Lemmy is federated
No, that’s not what I’m saying. I’m saying that because federation is a two-way street and can ben enabled or disabled between any two instances, it will always be possible to have instances that are unaffected by threads. Certainly, some instances will choose not to federate with threads - and so there will always be the possibility to join a community (or create one) that shuts itself off from that influence. Take beehaw.org for example - they didn’t like the influence lemmy.world had on their community so they defederated. They are no longer influenced by lemmy.world. The point I am trying to make is that because of that fact (that possibility), there is no reason at all to desire to limit the total scope (userbase) of all of lemmy. If you want a private/closed community, then make one or join one - you don’t need to suppress everyone just to achieve your own personal goals for a community.
There was an article not long ago about how blocking threads won’t make the problem go away. Not sure how to find it again here, I tried searching for it but there are so many articles about Threads so it’s hard to find. Either way it made a very good case why blocking won’t make a difference.
“The bigger a social platform gets the more synergy it spawns”
Ehhhh, small groups have plenty of synergy, no?
Is some growth good? Of course. Is becoming as big as everyone else is a good idea? You tell me: which megalithic tech company has a userbase that isn’t being poisoned or exploited? Namely: Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, Reddit, etc.
Keeping a reasonable size, just like anything else in this life, is the correct option. Obsessive growth leads to greed and misery.
EDIT: Sorry for being so brain dead in my initial response
To be fair, a lot of the “before” users were just out right assholes to us kids trying to figure out how to use the internet. There was definitely a culture of superiority from the early adopters.
It’s not the people that got dumber, the tech did. Everyone has the capacity to become more knowledgeable of computers and the internet as a whole, but large corporations dumbed it down so they can take control of everything.
I really don’t like this superiority complex of calling anyone who has other priorities in life a member of the “brainless masses”.
I get that it’s nice to have in-depth conversations with smart people about things you find interesting. I’m here precisely for that reason myself, but I’d much prefer to do so in a community of people that doesn’t derive its sense of identity from how superior they feel to everyone else. I agree that the Fediverse doesn’t need to be the next big thing, but that doesn’t mean we have to actively be asses to everyone we think is beneath us because they’re not worthy of the truly great privilege that is speaking to us.
I’d much rather the platform itself simply be deeply robust, very accessible and easy to use, and most importantly, extremely conducive to allowing individual communities to form and enforce their own rules and norms. There is no reason at all why one community can’t have extremely strict standards and require all comments to be made by credentialed users who cite all sources while having discussions about, say, physics, while another might be devoted to the Kardashians or logistics for the Taylor Swift Eras Tour or whatever else pop culture has decided is the topic du jour. These are not necessarily in contradiction, and particularly with different instances, nothing stops you from primarily participating in an instance that focuses more on nerdy things and bans memes and pop culture, or that has any other focus that suits you. If you find yourself getting content from more general interest instances that you’re not liking, you can block them. This level of flexibility is the exact point of the Fediverse in the first place. There’s no need to gatekeep the entire Fediverse because you want your own fun nerd space; the Fediverse already easily facilitates that level of independent community creation.
Lest you think I be one of the brainless rabble, rest assured I’m speaking as someone who studied computer science at Harvard, works in cybersecurity, and knows Latin, Greek, French, and Arabic - since apparently people aren’t worthy of speaking to you unless they pass some kind of intelligence test.
oh I assure you, I can be just as much a dumbass as the best of them.
But seriously speaking, I really don’t like this tendency in some more geek-oriented circles of thinking that being interested in tech and science, or even being smart, makes you inherently better or more worthy of dignity than anyone else. I used to very much be that kind of person (not quite the /r/atheism ‘I am enlightened by my own intelligence’ level of edgelord, but not terribly far off), and it’s an attitude I’ve come to really dislike.
This post has the energy of a treehouse with a “no girls allowed sign” on the door.
The gatekeeping just makes some people feel like they’re special because they are the ones doing the gatekeeping rather than the ones being excluded by it. And it usually involves defending flaws in the community that drive most people away because they serve the same purpose.
Right? We aren’t enlightened sages just because the platform we use is a little bit harder to understand. We need more than just people with technical skills, and if there’s this many people agreeing with calling others the “brainless masses”, seems like people skills are on short supply.
Not horrendously uncommon in these kinds of spaces, for one reason or another. The Fediverse definitely isn’t at this point, but there is a point at which it’s not that ‘normies’ don’t understand you or are too dumb to talk about the things you’re interested in, but rather, that they understand you perfectly, and think that you’re an asshole.
Speaking personally, I’m trying to replace that “Frontpage of the internet” that Reddit used to be. Lemmy is great. I’m actually really liking the communities here. But there aren’t enough posts because there aren’t enough users yet, IMO. Maybe what I actually need is to stop using a single place for all of my news/pop culture watching, but… that’s where I’m at.
I think their overall point is that there can be some sites that are more niche and serving certain communities/groups of people, that not everything needs to be the biggest thing ever with millions of users. Where everyone is shouting over each other and the original idea or spirit of the place ends up lost.
I would never say the masses shouldn’t have access to the internet, but if the comment is coming from a place where an alternative to Reddit doesn’t need to have as many users or be as mainstream I can get behind that. Sometimes when the floodgates are opened a place just isn’t the same anymore and loses sight of what made it great.
Because social media exists to connect people. This is not a forum for a single niche topic, why would we ever just call it enough and be done with it? There are many communities that I’d like to follow that are still struggling to get off the ground.
I don’t know what you are here for, but to me the Fediverse is not great as it is. It has potential to be but it’s still largely tiny and niche, I can’t find a fraction of what I’d like to. That may make it more manageable so far, but it’s also pretty empty.
Let me be real, one thing that definitely won’t help this place no matter the size is this sense of superiority that we are better without the “brainless masses”. Over the years it has become very clear that whether people are technologically adept and whether they are good contributors and members of a community are two completely unrelated things. It’s just unfounded elitism.
What we do need to watch out for is for corporate control, advertiser influence and algorithms which prioritize profit or clickthrough at any costs. A lot of internet media has devolved not because of “the masses”, but because they prefer the eyeballs that outrage bring over cultivating a harmonious community.
Many people – and especially the media – are trained at this point to follow “the next big thing”. It’s the promise of being out ahead of your peers somehow, without actually having to do much of anything.
I love that without bots to downvote what should be considered problematic speech you find that the VAST majority agree with you, it’s almost like bots were created to manufacture consensus within communities by making opinions of the minority look like they were the majority, I expect we will see those bots if lemmy really takes off.
This. Instagram was probably amazing back when it only had people who looked good in pics and/or were good at taking pics, and only posted stuff if it was particularly interesting. Rather than the whole world being sorta forced to put random pics on there.
It’s even worse now. I have an insta account for my business, and overnight likes on pics plummeted. Now, since they presumably want to compete with TikTok, you only populate on peoples feeds with videos, and posting CONSTANTLY. If you stop for a day or two, you basically start back over. I don’t want to spend time on there, I don’t want to post multiple times daily, but to stay “relevant” you don’t have a choice.
Why does everyone keep thinking fedi needs to be the next “big thing.”
It’s great as it is. It doesn’t need to be easier, or more widely adopted.
The internet used to be difficult to use and that acted as a filter to keep the brainless masses away. It’s fine. It was BETTER back then.
People want the Fediverse to grow because we can see how much damage corporate walled gardens have done to our society, and we care about others who are still trapped in a cycle of corporate abuse. We dream of a better world and see the massive potential benefits a decentralized global communications protocol hold for humanities future.
Beautifully said.
Does anyone have a home remedy for the darkness within that is slowly overcoming your will to live?
I tried apple cider vinegar
Have you tried “Barbie”, only in theaters July 21st?
Aren’t you on strike?
That starts tomorrow at midnight.
Oops, sorry. We stand with you!
Drink chicken soup and watch Groundhog Day
How many times? Is it yes?
mushrooms and puppies and a creative outlet
Get your motorbike license and go on a trip in South America.
I need the ability to save comments in Memmy for well written comments just like this
Thanks for reminding me to save the above comment! Wefwef (now Voyager) ftw but hope you get it on Memmy, too, ASAP.
Connect has that, it looks like a bookmark
Checking in from Liftoff we have it here too.
Mlem as well.
Yeah I get that but any big tech company can just buy the entire fediverse if they want to. They can offer instance owners money to sell their instance. They can put Lemmy developers on the payroll with 500k salaries, or replace them. They can add things like allowing people to make money by posting stuff. Suddenly we have influencers, and while they may not appeal to you, they will appeal to the millions of people who like them on Instagram.
I may not be right about the details but I’m just painting a picture here. You are letting your dreams about a better world totally cloud your judgment here. Corporations can take this place over easily and they will be really interested in that if the active user count becomes big.
People say “then we just move to another platform”. Yeah, like the one we have now? And try to get it big? So we can end up again having to move away from it…
The only way to win is to stay smallish and under the radar. Be a fringe interest for a couple of million active users.
You’re 100% wrong on the details.
A few things:
Now don’t get me wrong, they can absolutely meddle, but not purely through money or hostile takeovers, due to the decentralised nature of the Fediverse. No matter what, the Fediverse will always exist as it is, all the huge platforms can do is try to make it so people don’t want to use the Fediverse and move to their platforms instead.
To try and give an analogy, it would be like a company trying to “buy the web” - they literally cannot. Of course, we do have some huge players who control a lot of the web and attempt to dictate standards for everyone else, but there is no one iron fist that rules over everything, and there’s many small players and communities all over the place.
I really appreciate this explanation. I was a bit worried about corporations (Meta) taking over myself and now I know it wouldn’t be a problem. I’ve been online since the mid 90s but never learned the ins and outs of how it all works especially when it comes to FOSS.
I mean there is still the very real threat of niche irrelevance. If enough instances are aligned with corporations, the embrace, extend, extinguish can happen. You really want Independent instances to have at least a 1/3 of the population. Threads is gonna make that extremely tricky when it federates.
They would just need to buy servers faster than users move instances, wouldn’t they?
“any big tech company can just buy the entire fediverse if they want to”
They literally can’t.
If someone bought every instance in the Fediverse, they would technically own the Fediverse.
Removed by mod
No, they wouldn’t. They’d just own some servers. And in the meantime, other instances would appear. To own the fediverse you’d have to completely control every web server in existence, halt production on new web servers and somehow find a way to make open source software licenses invalid, buy then patent, then remove all the existing fediverse software types, somehow repeal ActivityPub as a standard and then make it all illegal across the entire world.
…and they can turn around and create another instance
Lemmy devs don’t really “own” the code, since it is free software. It can be forked at any time by anyone.
…and existing fediverse instances can just not federate with instances that push that bullshit
I’m sick of people acting like they’re superior and only they deserve the Internet because they think they’re intelligent. The “brainless masses” have just as much right to use the internet as you do. Stop trying to gatekeep the Internet.
More mildly put, people are diverse, which is a great resource.
I want to follow communities about a wide variety of topics. Some appeal to intellectual, tech-savvy people, others don’t.
If the platform is deterring to the later group, my experience suffers because I lack content in these areas.
People can use their brains in many more ways than understanding technology. Just because a person is not good in navigating technology does not mean they have no brain.
For example, I’d love to see more going on in communities about performative arts, philosophy, activism, regional cultural events. Occasionally, I like to peek into bubbles which are completely different from my own.
With power comes responsibility. I see it as the responsibility of people who understand technology to make it accessible to those who don’t.
id rather not use a platform loaded with greasy snobs saying “brainless masses” too
Then you might want to get off the Internet because, as long as there’s idiots, smarter people will call them out for their idiocy.
Did you know there’s a surgery where you can stretch out your vertebrae so you can suck your own bits?
You seem like you’ve got the flexibility to manage without surgery.
I would even go further and say that I also want to interact with people who just want to be silly or want to share their bizarre views about things. Variety is the spice of life. As long as these communities can remain separate (like how the fediverse has communities), then the more the merrier.
I honestly don’t think something having a higher barrier to entry is gatekeeping. Ofcourse you shouldn’t try to make things actively more difficult but I don’t think lemmy is doing that anyways.
I’m starting to lose the meaning of gatekeeping more and more. Its used so often and loosely
Let’s go further! Computers should not come with an operating system installed.
Yes, they shouldn’t, unironically
careful, there’s a lot of Linux users here. you thought you made a good point but you only just gave them erections
better run before they tell you to start using Linux!!
Its too late! I already use endeavourOS! Its too good not to!
You cannot run from us, silly. Got a minute to talk about our Lord and Savior GNU/Linux? continues to elaborate
Linux is not an OS, but you GNU that.
thats how linux would win the consumer desktop finally.
I bet more people would be happier with every day use on linux. I know I am.
I think most people prefer their drivers and games work out of the box on a system they won’t break by accident. Linux won’t be the solution until it caters to a better class of idiot.
That would be a godsend. First thing I do is reinstall a clean os anyways
Maybe you don’t get on Instagram or facebook much, but content for brain-dead people exists, And every time I’m left in shit as nothing is documented but only commented unnecessarily with onomatopoeias and emojis.
I do not fully agree with this. Simply because by having a lack of users, there will not be answers to questions that require expertise
Exactly. We need people here. The strength of Reddit at this point is that, for any interest you might have, no matter how niche, there will be a sizeable community on Reddit that knows a lot about it and is yearning to talk about it. Outside of tech and science adjacent topics, that’s simply not really the case here.
Sure, sometimes I want to talk about new developments in tech. And other times, I want to talk about Carly Rae Jepsen’s upcoming album, The Loveliest Time, and how I’m fucking stoked to see her in less than a month.
deleted by creator
This is the exactly the unwelcoming approach which would result in an unwelcoming environment
deleted by creator
What I am saying is that the community should be open for as many people as possible.
Making/keeping something purposefully difficult to use is like saying to someone that you won’t talk to them because they don’t have a PhD. in math.
deleted by creator
I’d much rather welcome the normies than people who compare human beings to pissing stray dogs, personally.
I think we pretty much have all the answers needed somewhere on the rest of the internet. It might just take some extra effort to find what you need.
Also, we will probably have language models running locally on our phones with all the info we’ll ever need in a short few years anyways.
Because I want there to be shit to do on here
Send in the clowns!
The bigger a social platform gets, the more synergy it spawns. That’s what adds utility to a social platform.
I don’t think anyone here wants it to be ‘the next big thing’, but I do think a lot of people (myself included) want to see it become ‘one of the next big things’. As in…we want it to become big enough to be a viable alternative to the proprietary walled-garden corporate establishments that have become the current standard.
More choice = better, and for as long as this platform remains small and elitist (referring back to your 3rd sentence), it will never truly be a viable choice. There’s still a lot of engagement I’m required to use Reddit for - and I hate that - and the only reason for it is we just don’t have the community size needed (yes, it’s getting closer every day) to be that viable alternative.
You are young it sounds like. If Lemmy becomes that size, all good things about it goes away, and we get ads and corporations moving in to profit from it. That turns the entire thing into the same shit as everything else.
It happens over and over and over again in tech. It’s a pattern that all older people knows about because we have lived it.
So I hope Lemmy stays small. Bigger than now, sure, but not big enough to attract corporations.
As toxic as Reddit is, it is a huge wealth of information if you can search and parse it. It also encourages small niche topics that wouldn’t get any attention without a huge audience to draw from. If Reddit is no longer going to feed that role, I hope SOMEPLACE becomes that kind of place in the future. If it’s the Fediverse nothing stops instances from creating smaller communities within it. Could be best of both worlds. Or it could ruin it. I guess I don’t know.
I think the Fediverse model has a really strong advantage compared to past platforms. Corporations are always going to have a profit motive, and that will necessarily eventually make the user experience worse. With how easy it is to move things around in the Fediverse, there’s a meaningfully lower risk of that since the lock-in factor is reduced. I’m sure we will see monetized corporate instances (see, Threads), but if that experience eventually gets intolerable, it’d be relatively easy for users to jump ship without drastically changing the experience.
It’s not perfect, but we’re in a better position I think.
@BraveSirZaphod
@ekZepp @CaptainAniki @krayj @mrmanager
(Messaging from mastodon server) I think so too. Your posts may not follow, but the freedom to move from one server to another, and the freedom to follow posts and info from other servers means if threads wants me to join they’d need make the experience better than anywhere else, or I can leave and still follow anybody I was following before.
Okay see, this itself shows exactly what I’m saying. I’m on Kbin, you’re on Mastodon, and we’re talking on a Lemmy instance. This is genuinely stupid cool.
No. But it’s humorous to me that you immediately go there for anyone who disagrees with your take. I’m >5 decades.
Sounds like massive speculation. Especially for an open platform system that anyone can self-host. If you don’t like ads or paying for service, light up your own instance and self host. That is, by definition, why lemmy works the way lemmy works. I hate to accuse you of making shit up, but you are making shit up.
I’ve probably lived through more of this than you have. I’ve made my career in the tech industry and have been at it since 1991. Again, you keep trying to imply that you somehow have more experience or more time in industry just because I disagree with you. That’s awfully pretentious.
That’s elitist. And it’s self-defeating. Sounds like you’d be happy just joining a few email list servers…because you aren’t going to get any more value than that out of the self-inflicted handicap of keeping community sizes tiny.
You seem to have equated what you think is superior age and experience with superior wisdom. You’re wrong on multiple counts and committing numerous logical fallacies while you’re at it. Larger platforms are more successful because they have the community sizes needed to make even niche topics relatively engaging. There’s a critical mass of users needed to make that happen. Lemmy is a few orders of magnitude too small for that yet, but that’s what it will take to be a viable alternative. I’m not suggesting that Lemmy should get so big that it causes places like Reddit to disappear…just that it gets big enough to be a viable alternative. If it’s not big enough to be a viable alternative, then what’s the point? To just be an elitist circle jerk for for a few people discussing a few popular topics somewhere outside the mainstream so they can think they are some kind of techno-hipsters? What a waste.
We disagree with eachother for sure. I’m also about your age, and I havent seen any platform become big without also becoming user hostile. Google, Youtube, Reddit, Meta, you name it.
It seems that you believe that just because Lemmy is federated, it will be able to not be affected by Threads and it’s users. We will see. I doubt it.
No, that’s not what I’m saying. I’m saying that because federation is a two-way street and can ben enabled or disabled between any two instances, it will always be possible to have instances that are unaffected by threads. Certainly, some instances will choose not to federate with threads - and so there will always be the possibility to join a community (or create one) that shuts itself off from that influence. Take beehaw.org for example - they didn’t like the influence lemmy.world had on their community so they defederated. They are no longer influenced by lemmy.world. The point I am trying to make is that because of that fact (that possibility), there is no reason at all to desire to limit the total scope (userbase) of all of lemmy. If you want a private/closed community, then make one or join one - you don’t need to suppress everyone just to achieve your own personal goals for a community.
There was an article not long ago about how blocking threads won’t make the problem go away. Not sure how to find it again here, I tried searching for it but there are so many articles about Threads so it’s hard to find. Either way it made a very good case why blocking won’t make a difference.
“The bigger a social platform gets the more synergy it spawns”
Ehhhh, small groups have plenty of synergy, no?
Is some growth good? Of course. Is becoming as big as everyone else is a good idea? You tell me: which megalithic tech company has a userbase that isn’t being poisoned or exploited? Namely: Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, Reddit, etc.
Keeping a reasonable size, just like anything else in this life, is the correct option. Obsessive growth leads to greed and misery.
EDIT: Sorry for being so brain dead in my initial response
Don’t be hostile.
“Why isn’t anyone interested in my hobby!? I keep telling them they’re wrong and they keep leaving!”
Reddit tier aggression lol. Chill out and then we’ll listen to what you have to say.
Thanks for calling me out fam
What exactly is wrong with his comment? He’s right.
It came off as aggressive but they fixed it
What’s wrong with a little aggression if you’re making a solid point and straightening a few people out?
yeah, that September never ends
To be fair, a lot of the “before” users were just out right assholes to us kids trying to figure out how to use the internet. There was definitely a culture of superiority from the early adopters.
Which is clearly very much present here lol, looking at these comments.
“The internet is for ME and OTHER SMART PEOPLE that I LIKE and not DOODOOHEADS.”
Son, you gotta share your toys - or no ice cream after dinner.
It’s not the people that got dumber, the tech did. Everyone has the capacity to become more knowledgeable of computers and the internet as a whole, but large corporations dumbed it down so they can take control of everything.
Distilling down all the options to be us vs them. Are you an android pleb or do you have a blue bubble. Glad some people are fighting back.
I really don’t like this superiority complex of calling anyone who has other priorities in life a member of the “brainless masses”.
I get that it’s nice to have in-depth conversations with smart people about things you find interesting. I’m here precisely for that reason myself, but I’d much prefer to do so in a community of people that doesn’t derive its sense of identity from how superior they feel to everyone else. I agree that the Fediverse doesn’t need to be the next big thing, but that doesn’t mean we have to actively be asses to everyone we think is beneath us because they’re not worthy of the truly great privilege that is speaking to us.
I’d much rather the platform itself simply be deeply robust, very accessible and easy to use, and most importantly, extremely conducive to allowing individual communities to form and enforce their own rules and norms. There is no reason at all why one community can’t have extremely strict standards and require all comments to be made by credentialed users who cite all sources while having discussions about, say, physics, while another might be devoted to the Kardashians or logistics for the Taylor Swift Eras Tour or whatever else pop culture has decided is the topic du jour. These are not necessarily in contradiction, and particularly with different instances, nothing stops you from primarily participating in an instance that focuses more on nerdy things and bans memes and pop culture, or that has any other focus that suits you. If you find yourself getting content from more general interest instances that you’re not liking, you can block them. This level of flexibility is the exact point of the Fediverse in the first place. There’s no need to gatekeep the entire Fediverse because you want your own fun nerd space; the Fediverse already easily facilitates that level of independent community creation.
Lest you think I be one of the brainless rabble, rest assured I’m speaking as someone who studied computer science at Harvard, works in cybersecurity, and knows Latin, Greek, French, and Arabic - since apparently people aren’t worthy of speaking to you unless they pass some kind of intelligence test.
Sounds like you’re the one with the superiority complex bro.
oh I assure you, I can be just as much a dumbass as the best of them.
But seriously speaking, I really don’t like this tendency in some more geek-oriented circles of thinking that being interested in tech and science, or even being smart, makes you inherently better or more worthy of dignity than anyone else. I used to very much be that kind of person (not quite the /r/atheism ‘I am enlightened by my own intelligence’ level of edgelord, but not terribly far off), and it’s an attitude I’ve come to really dislike.
Whoosh
I just want big tech social media to fail. It gives too much power to Musk, Zuck, Spez, et al.
This post has the energy of a treehouse with a “no girls allowed sign” on the door.
The gatekeeping just makes some people feel like they’re special because they are the ones doing the gatekeeping rather than the ones being excluded by it. And it usually involves defending flaws in the community that drive most people away because they serve the same purpose.
Right? We aren’t enlightened sages just because the platform we use is a little bit harder to understand. We need more than just people with technical skills, and if there’s this many people agreeing with calling others the “brainless masses”, seems like people skills are on short supply.
Not horrendously uncommon in these kinds of spaces, for one reason or another. The Fediverse definitely isn’t at this point, but there is a point at which it’s not that ‘normies’ don’t understand you or are too dumb to talk about the things you’re interested in, but rather, that they understand you perfectly, and think that you’re an asshole.
deleted by creator
Speaking personally, I’m trying to replace that “Frontpage of the internet” that Reddit used to be. Lemmy is great. I’m actually really liking the communities here. But there aren’t enough posts because there aren’t enough users yet, IMO. Maybe what I actually need is to stop using a single place for all of my news/pop culture watching, but… that’s where I’m at.
Indeed. The masses would ruin this place, 100%.
It feels like September is finally ending. Somebody wake up Billie Joe Armstrong.
You sound like a lovely, humble person who never screams at their loved ones
I think their overall point is that there can be some sites that are more niche and serving certain communities/groups of people, that not everything needs to be the biggest thing ever with millions of users. Where everyone is shouting over each other and the original idea or spirit of the place ends up lost.
I would never say the masses shouldn’t have access to the internet, but if the comment is coming from a place where an alternative to Reddit doesn’t need to have as many users or be as mainstream I can get behind that. Sometimes when the floodgates are opened a place just isn’t the same anymore and loses sight of what made it great.
Because social media exists to connect people. This is not a forum for a single niche topic, why would we ever just call it enough and be done with it? There are many communities that I’d like to follow that are still struggling to get off the ground.
I don’t know what you are here for, but to me the Fediverse is not great as it is. It has potential to be but it’s still largely tiny and niche, I can’t find a fraction of what I’d like to. That may make it more manageable so far, but it’s also pretty empty.
Let me be real, one thing that definitely won’t help this place no matter the size is this sense of superiority that we are better without the “brainless masses”. Over the years it has become very clear that whether people are technologically adept and whether they are good contributors and members of a community are two completely unrelated things. It’s just unfounded elitism.
What we do need to watch out for is for corporate control, advertiser influence and algorithms which prioritize profit or clickthrough at any costs. A lot of internet media has devolved not because of “the masses”, but because they prefer the eyeballs that outrage bring over cultivating a harmonious community.
Finally, an actual controversial post!
Many people – and especially the media – are trained at this point to follow “the next big thing”. It’s the promise of being out ahead of your peers somehow, without actually having to do much of anything.
I mean. I will never say no to easier.
Removed by mod
The business mentality demands competition and unlimited growth, which encourages ‘next big thing’.
The fediverse motivations are not necessarily business. So we can define what we want from it.
🍋
because everything needs to grow, or die.
homeostatic states are not a thing that exist in western society.
Not everything needs to grow forever though. Lots of things are fine stopping at “big enough”.
And for the moment, if you have literally any interests beyond tech and science, the Fediverse simply isn’t big enough yet.
I love that without bots to downvote what should be considered problematic speech you find that the VAST majority agree with you, it’s almost like bots were created to manufacture consensus within communities by making opinions of the minority look like they were the majority, I expect we will see those bots if lemmy really takes off.
This. Instagram was probably amazing back when it only had people who looked good in pics and/or were good at taking pics, and only posted stuff if it was particularly interesting. Rather than the whole world being sorta forced to put random pics on there.
It’s even worse now. I have an insta account for my business, and overnight likes on pics plummeted. Now, since they presumably want to compete with TikTok, you only populate on peoples feeds with videos, and posting CONSTANTLY. If you stop for a day or two, you basically start back over. I don’t want to spend time on there, I don’t want to post multiple times daily, but to stay “relevant” you don’t have a choice.