• Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    11 months ago

    All they had was a charge, not a conviction. Are you saying you want to strip the right of self defense from innocent people?

    • StorminNorman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      Probably why they used the word “if”. IF they’d been convicted, the incident wouldn’t have happened. Not, they should’ve lost their gun cos they were charged. As it stands, nobody needs a gun for self defence anyway. The number of countries who manage to cope in this way far out numbers the US.