Summary

Former vice presidential nominee Tim Walz criticized Trump for economic chaos while taking personal responsibility for the situation during an MSNBC interview.

“We wouldn’t be in this mess if we’d have won the election — and we didn’t,” Walz told Chris Hayes. He called Trump the “worst possible business executive” and praised the Wall Street Journal’s editorial criticizing Trump’s tariff war.

Walz emphasized Democrats must offer something better, not just criticize Trump. Recently, he acknowledged a leadership void in the Democratic Party and admitted spending too much time combatting Trump’s false claims about immigrants.

  • Nalivai@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    1 day ago

    If voting patterns of America ever showed something consistently, it is the fact that shifting to the left in any sense never works. You can sometimes entice the public with enough vigor so they don’t focus on your politics, but outside of very rare cases, shifting to the right consistently brings some votes, and shifting to the left consistently brings loses.
    And no amount of social media posts was able to change it weirdly enough.
    It might have something to do with consistent anti-voting narrative of a lot of the vocal leftists, coupled with their bafflement that they consistently don’t get a desired outcome.

    • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      If voting patterns of America ever showed something consistently, it is the fact that shifting to the left in any sense never works.

      Sounds like a great excuse to only move right.

        • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 day ago

          I did vote. For harris.

          Your party responds to all sensory input by moving right and punching left. You assume anyone who has a problem with that must be a nonvoter.

          • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            9 hours ago

            good job, you actually did something! Why are you here then? Go yell at your representatives or something, nobody cares.

            Your party responds to all sensory input by moving right and punching left.

            bold assumption.

            You assume anyone who has a problem with that must be a nonvoter.

            statistically, it’s very likely to be true, the primary demographic among the progressive left is younger people, the youth, the primary voting block is older people, the elderly. Statistically, this is bound to overlap in such a way that most people out here yapping online about stupid political shit like this, are not voting.

            • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              8 hours ago

              And the “I assume you are younger than me and therefore wrong” boomer dismissal is here again.

    • LeninsOvaries@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      That’s ridiculous. Kamala appealed right and she got fewer votes. We abstained and let Trump win to show her that.

      In 2028, Obama is gonna have to appeal to the left in order to win against Trump.

    • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      It might have something to do with consistent anti-voting narrative of a lot of the vocal leftists, coupled with their bafflement that they consistently don’t get a desired outcome.

      i think its primarily age demographics, and the fact that the voter base is stupid, i.e. votes for the wrong people.