208 dems didn’t do that, but your rhetoric deliberately ignores that to promote apathy and ultimately elect more gop

What should they be doing? They are an action camera company, they make action cameras. Do you think they needed to branch out to do energy drinks and lunchables or whatever?

In America people don’t vote, land votes

Yeah, because crypto is not that. The problems with it as a payment system are numerous and make it unusable. It’s barely better than lugging suitcases full of twenties as a payment system for doing crimes, but only barely. The only thing it’s really good for is scamming people and gambling

That was so szmer thing to answer

“Just”

Thus prolonging the war they were trying to deescalate.

France and Germany still have functioning democracy, however imperfect. What people think has a lot of bearing, it’s just it’s not immediate.

My definition of “encrypted” means that something is encrypted. You know, using cryptography.
Your definition of encrypted means that something is end-to-end encrypted, with only two corresponding people having keys. And we actually have a term for that, it’s end-to-end encryption.
I understand where you’re coming from, but only one of us using this word correctly.

I detect way more vitriol in that comment

You know, if you end-to-end encrypted, but mishandle keys, it’s actually demonstrably worse than if you client-to-server encrypted but there was no confirmed cases of anything leaked.
Nobody is misleading you because you have deeply held ideas on what words should mean.

That’s just your misunderstanding of the term. The chat is encrypted, no lies about it, it’s not end-to-end encrypted. Last time I checked they were quite explicit about that.
So far, Telegram worked exactly as it was advertised, it’s just people for some reason have weird ideas about what words mean and how stuff should work, but that’s not on them to be honest.
Plenty to criticize Telegram for, but lack of privacy isn’t it.

It’s just the first one with extra steps

Your anger is severely misplaced.

There are two possible explanation to this phenomenon come to mind. Either everyone is stupid zombie, and you’re the only one smart, intelligent, capable, uniquely so. Or, you, like a significant portion of non-qualified interviewers, suck at conducting the interview process which gives you an illusion that everyone is stupid and you’re smart, and you don’t want to do anything about it because being uniquely smart gives you good feelings that you don’t want to shatter.

China is getting advantage of a situation like they always do, getting a bunch of resources basically for free. Russia is desperate for any technology, so they’re happily exchanging future of their country for access to a market of cheap toys.
It’s not an allyship in any sense.

China is an ally of Russia

That’s not true in any meaningful sense of the word.

Boy if you really think that, you’re drinking so much cool-aid it’s dripping from your other end already. That’s terrifying in their own right.

I am not an expert on insectology or beeology, I don’t actually know do they learn or not. An emergent entity of a hive seems to be learning better than the individual insect, but we’re learning so much about them even now, I don’t feel comfortable to make any speculations.
I know about mammals a bit more, and know that humans do learn, but the hive mind learning works worse than in hiving insects.

This comment is also bullshit. ML products that sometimes are useful isn’t “AI”, they don’t have anything in common but some group of algorithms that we called “learning” back then when we thought it’s cute to do this skeuomorphic naming.
AI doesn’t exist because the term AI doesn’t mean anything anymore. It barely meant anything back then when computers were the size of a room, and it means less now.
So when you’re trying to smuggly “y’all rubes and peasants, you know nothing of actual magic, only I know actual magic”, you’re starting with the wrong premise, where AI is actually a thing, while it isn’t, no matter how much marketing is throwing around.