I’ve read “searchable female bodies” and was briefly very confused

I’m not going to argue

Obviously, that would require reading and engaging with my response, and you clearly decided to not do both even before I wrote it

The same reason you ask it to do anything.

It is far better than a modern search engine, although that is in part because of all of the SEO slop that Google has ingested. The fact that you need to think critically is not something new and it’s never going to go away either.

Very much disagree with that. Google got significantly worse, but LLM results are worse still. You do need to think critically about it, but with LLM blurb there is no ways to check for validity other than to do another search without LLM, to find sources, (and in this case why even bother with the generator in the first place), or accept that some of your new info can be incorrect, and you don’t know which part.
With conventional search you have all the context of your result, you have the reputation of the website itself, you have the info about who wrote the article or whatever, you have the tone of article, you have comments, you have all the subtle clues that we learnt to pick up on both from our lifetime experience on the internet, and civilisational span experience with human interaction. With the generator you have zero of that, you have something that is stated as fact, and everything has the same weight and the same validity, and even when it sites sources, those can be just outright lies.

A year ago I was looking for a job, and by the end I had three similar job offers, and to decide I asked all of them do they use LLMs. Two said “yes very much so it’s the future ai is smarter than god”, and the third said “only if you really want, but nowhere where it matters”. I chose the third one. Two others are now bankrupt.

It’s not that it’s impossible, but it requires effort, skill, and time. Instead of hiring a bunch of programmers who would make it run on the device locally, you can just throw the same amount of money at Amazon and it will run whatever unoptimised version of the renderer you stole on some random Chinese forum. As a bonus, you got to enrich a multibillionaire and make a world slightly worse place, which is a second and third priority of every CEO after getting money.

Don’t worry, the quality of the modern hardware is so shitty, it will not outlive the company for long

If you’re relatively rich that is.

We very nicely ask notorious liars not to lie this time. Surely, that will help

This argument would make some sense if anyone actually generated this kind of shit on their own pcs using very little electricity. However, people are not doing that.

Did you come up with all those words yourself, or did you ask your favourite autocomplete to string this nonsense together?
Don’t answer, actually, I don’t care

Fuck off right back with your shit. Wasting electricity on frivolous shit is miles better than wasting it on generating slop.

Or instead of pretending that that’s what you’re doing, you can spend five hours learning how to photoshop, and express an ounce of your human fucking creativity. Alternatively, you can do none of that and walk around in the park.

You’d probably have had a better result photoshopping it yourself

True for every piece of generated slop out there

By this logic, every candidate ever is a candidate of change, even incumbent runs on changing something he didn’t change first time around. In fact, Biden was widely criticized for literally saying “nothing will fundamentally change”, so calling him a change candidate is wrong even by the metrics you’re trying to introduce.

a “change” candidate
Biden

Ah, you’re just saying words then

I spent to much time in trans community to react normally to “T button”

The real AI will be cool if it’s even possible. Or terrifying. Or a combination of the two.
Slightly advanced autocomplete has nothing to do with it though

That’s not the predictability we want. If I write a calculator that adds the output of rand() to any result, it will also be repeatable with the same seed on the same machine. It will be non-functional as a calculator though.

Somehow, Snoke is just fine