For most of this century, Germany racked up one economic success after another, dominating global markets for high-end products like luxury cars and industrial machinery, selling so much to the rest of the world that half the economy ran on exports.

Jobs were plentiful, the government’s financial coffers grew as other European countries drowned in debt, and books were written about what other countries could learn from Germany.

No longer. Now, Germany is the world’s worst-performing major developed economy, with both the International Monetary Fund and European Union expecting it to shrink this year.

  • UnfortunateShort@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    119
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    “Germany is hugely successful and has been for years, but now it’s success is slightly shrinking.”

    Now please blame socialism and I got that sweet capitalist circle jerk bingo

    • FMT99@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      75
      ·
      1 year ago

      They did interview both a CEO and a banker for this article so they did their best to get some diverse insights.

    • Murvel@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Blame the absolutely deranged state of German leadership that brought us such things as Ostpolitik, Nordstream 1 & 2, replacing nuclear power with brown coal power plants and green washing ‘natural gas’.

    • nicman24@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      16
      ·
      1 year ago

      germany was and is one of the better working socialistic democracies. calm your prosecution fetish

      • UnfortunateShort@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t feel persecuted, I just want to point out how stupid it is to portrait even the slightest economic hiccup as a major failure, especially after facing two crises in short succession (with the climate crisis not even counted).

        In fact, what you pointed out is among the reasons for that: All things considered, Germany is doing pretty OK. And I think economic growth is a much easier to solve problem than becoming a more sustainable economy/society (i.e. having social stability, fixing the education system, becoming less polluting and more independent from the global superpowers).

  • Knusper@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    86
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    1 year ago

    What kind of propaganda non-sense article is that? I live in Germany. We’re doing absolutely fine.

    • sebinspace@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      43
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I’m fucking American and if you want the bottom spot you’ll have to fucking fight us for it!

      • ShittyRedditWasBetter@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        25
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Imagine believing for a second America is fighting for bottom ranks in wealth, even among the poor.

        The imaginary world you people live in must be fantastic.

        • Aux@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          People in developed countries like US don’t even understand what actual poverty is, give them some slack.

            • Aux@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              How about eating 4 slices of bread per day for months? Yeah, I have some “great” memories.

    • float@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      We must live in two different Germanies than. I travel a lot and other countries are moving forward a lot faster than we are. Thanks to the CDU we weren’t doing much until recently. There are many topics that need attention, especially infrastructure, buerocracy, public health and retirement insurances, corruption aka “lobbyism”, and the list goes on. That’s all things you could fix one by one, but looking at how/what people vote, there won’t be any progress in the next decade imho.

    • keesrif@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It might be overstating some things, but I’ve heard quite a few hardware startups fail the past years due to parts shortage, rising parts costs, energy costs, etc.

      On the large industry scale the machine is ticking away just fine, but I’ve experienced first hand how those factors have decimated any reserves small players have over the past few years. And large companies don’t innovate nearly as much as small ones can - competitive advantages for the future are definitely lost here. While that may not be a problem today, that does mean Germany will be behind on innovation in 5 - 10 years.

        • keesrif@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          They did, but they didn’t see as sharp of an energy price increase as far as I know. Our energy bill has increased so much that we had to not only deal with project (and thus payment) delays due to the shortages, but also with projects suddenly not bringing in money but costing us. This had a compounding effect on many small businesses.

    • 01011@monero.town
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      You don’t do business in Germany then because I’ve been hearing otherwise of late.

      • Knusper@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Like most other countries, we’ve had to deal with COVID, inflation+countermeasures and climate troubles. And as an export nation, we’ve likely even been hit relatively badly by such global issues.
        So, of course, not everything is entirely rosy. And of course, you’ll find people complaining.

        But this article makes it sound like we’ve entered a massive crisis. As if the Germany of today looks like a poor nation compared to the Germany five years ago. And that’s just not the case. We’re still filthy rich compared to most countries. Our current government is pushing the country forward again (after 16 years of stagnation before the pandemic). The fruition of these measures will obviously take some years to kick in, and we will now have to deal with climate change, whether we like it or not, but ultimately, it feels like our economy (+ the things that actually matter) are on an upward trend again.

  • SHITPOSTING_ACCOUNT@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    In terms of energy, the major fuckup was making gas cheap and electricity expensive (with taxes and renewable subsidies paid by private consumers).

    If gas is 6 cents per kWh and electricity 35, no wonder people were installing gas heaters instead of heat pumps. Gas now being 9 and electricity 40 doesn’t make it much better.

    A heat pump would have to give you 4.4 kWh of heat for 1 kW of electricity to make financial sense even if it didn’t cost more (Wikipedia: “Test results of the best systems are around 4.5. When measuring installed units over a whole season and accounting for the energy needed to pump water through the piping systems, seasonal COP’s for heating are around 3.5 or less.”)

  • Gsus4@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    No more cheap russian gas and oil, internal combustion engine expertise and all the associated pieces and submarkets being phased out in favour of simpler electric cars…it’s going to be a few hard years until they find a new export industry to perfect. I’d expect hydrogen-based aviation or pharma, maybe even semiconductors, they’ll figure it out.

    • mean_bean279@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 year ago

      Well if Mercedes and BMW could stop making electric cars as ugly as humanly possible we would quickly see them take that market back. Lucid makes an INCREDIBLY gorgeous car and if I was in the market for an 80k plus dollar EV it would certainly be that over the ugly EQS sedan and the i7 EV with its buck teeth. The German automakers are stuck in a loop right now and I hope they’ll soon get out. As for Germany’s other economic sectors; much like the rest of the world everyone is still recovering from Covid economy shock. Especially when we went from producing nothing for 1-6 months, then slowly starting, then ramping up like crazy and now coming back down to reality. It’s going to be a rough couple years of Capitalism having to learn that businesses and economies staying flat isn’t a bad thing. No progress, but no loss either. Germany isn’t alone in this.

      • Gsus4@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        18
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Ugly? Why do people fetishize their cars? I want it to work efficiently, be safe and cheap to maintain…if it looks like a gherkin, so be it 😄 The problem with German electric cars is not that, it’s that atm they can’t compete with China in price and they have no tech edge in supply chains anymore. Also, newer generations in Europe aren’t as obsessed with owning a car anymore (I think).

        • idiomaddict@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          I don’t want to live in an ugly home either, but it’s not because I fetishize fresh paint

        • tomi000@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Why do we like eating nicely prepared food instead of a ground up paste? Its just nutrients, right?

          Why do we wear nice clothes? Theyre just for enduring heat and cold, so black robes for everyone should do, right?

          • Gsus4@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            9
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Yes, I’m one of those people who wouldn’t mind living in Zion, eating nutritious slop and wearing unremarkable homemade textiles ;)

            PS: but I understand many people need to brag to their friends or impress their clients or make themselves feel better by displaying their status in some material way.

            I just don’t see any huge aesthetic differences between any of the cars for sale that would singlehandedly stop e.g. German electric cars from being sold: they all look like sleek solutions to a conditioned aerodynamics problem :D

            • tomi000@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              10
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Nothing to do with bragging or impressing people. Most people have their own tastes, just because for some reason you have no understanding of the concept of beauty doesnt make the rest of the world weird.

              • Gsus4@feddit.nl
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Sometimes it is, but even when it isn’t, “taste” by itself is not by itself what is making people stopping themselves from an adequate vehicle.

                This is what I was originally replying to and I think it’s nonsense (regardless of how “refined” your taste is):

                Well if Mercedes and BMW could stop making electric cars as ugly as humanly possible we would quickly see them take that market back.

                • tomi000@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Yes it may be an overstatement that Merc and BMW would rule the market if they started making appealing EVs, thats not what you were criticizing about the comment though. What you said was along the lines of ‘why would people not buy cars they dont find appealing’ and that just doesnt make sense.

        • CTdummy@artemis.camp
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I don’t think people wanting a vehicle they might have to commute daily in looking aesthetically pleasing quite meets the mark of fetishising. You might be ok driving a cube 2.0 but the rest of the market may not be and considering electric is trying to break into the established market of ICE…. Though to the larger point, most places could solve the problem by fixing/modernising public transport but that may just be too radical apparently.

          • Gsus4@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Haha, yea, the only heresy greater than owning an ugly efficient car these days is riding a bus 😧, it seems.

            • tomi000@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Noone said you cant have an ugly efficient car if you want. But theres absolutely no reason to shit on people for wanting their own possessions to be nice. Sure its better to not buy a car at all, but if you need one you should be allowed to get one that you like.

              • Gsus4@feddit.nl
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                7
                ·
                1 year ago

                Why are you replying here? I’m talking to you upstairs. Chill out.

  • Aceticon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    At this late stage of Neoliberal Capitalism, what’s deemed “economic success” is a measly 2% GDP “growth” and for Germany that can just be from exploiting its access to cheap hydrocarbons from Russia, something which is now pretty much over.

    Meanwhile, like everybody else, Germany is suffering the cummulative effects of 4 decades of neoliberalism and its “oh so special” way of managing the Economy (unconditional saving of Financial giants that overextended themselves, like Deutsche Bank, maximizing rewards for asset ownership and pumping up asset bubbles all over the place and so on) not just directly but also indirectly because you’re seeing empoverishment on a per-capita level in the countries to which German companies exported.

    I think (all of this is opinion) that the general late stage Neoliberal Capitalism malaise is affecting most western countries and then Germany, thanks to that extra push of loosing the golden goose of cheap hydrocarbons (which was so great for the likes of BASF) is just this little bit worst than most, and after a decade which normalized a few percent of GDP increment as “growth” it doesn’t take much of a “push” to have what is mathematically a large percentual difference in “growth” rates compared to the rest (i.e. when “growth” is 2%, loosing a mere 1% results in half the “growth”).

    Last but not least, as we’re living in Peak Bullshit Times when it comes to Politically Important Financial Figures, all of this ends up reported with no sense of proportion so tiny changes in a aggregate figure (not even per-capita) that doesn’t even map to most people’s experience are portrayed as enormously important (notice how in the “good times” we were told 2% was the country “growing”, when that value is statistically within the margin of error of the very processes used to produce those figures).

    • griD@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Also, this neoliberal course fucked up education somewhat fierce. We simply can’t deliver the quality anymore as more and more experienced engineers (the main driving force behind those exports) are retiring. And don’t get me started on the terrible internet/cell infrastructure!

      • InvertedParallax@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        Because we legitimized the financial sector as a net benefit to society, historically they were considered a net negative, but now all the smart kids want to go into investment banking.

        Boom and bust galore.

    • barsoap@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Don’t worry about BASF they’ve been preparing for the end of fossil fuels for decades and have a gazillion replacement recipes in place that they were already using depending on the oil price: If necessary they can produce all their precursors and therefore everything from e.g. starch, they’re also one of the primary investors in hydrogen infrastructure.

      OTOH they’re nowhere close to being the poster-child of green chemicals, that honour goes to Werner & Mertz (and a couple of even smaller companies noone has ever heard of, e.g. folks working on lignin-based plastics).

      • Aceticon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        And they didn’t use those recipes before, no doubt because the profit margins with those are lower.

        It doesn’t take much of a loss in profitability for a company as large as BASF to pull down Germany’s GDP if only a little bit (and when the difference between GDP growth being reported as “strong” or “weak” is all of +/-1%, every little bit counts).

        And then on top of that there’s other companies directly or indirectly dependent on cheap hydrocarbons, as well as the whole situation of the high dependency of German Households on gas for heating.

        I for one think that over the long run getting rid of its hydrocarbon addiction will be good for Germany, but before the country gets there the cold-turkey period will naturally impact its GDP growth.

  • Roflmasterbigpimp@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is bullshit propaganda². Did some Lobbyist bought an Article over there? We dont need “breathing room for our energy-intensive industry” we need this lazy fucks to become energy efficient!

  • moitoi@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    The first dominion of the fall of the neoliberalism. Germany has multiple major flaw.

    It didn’t invest in infrastructure like railways. Poor workers use public transportation what makes good conditions rare and therefore reduce the consumptions. The incomes are too low in the country. People can’t afford a basic live and can’t consume.

    Budgetary rigor. Politics for years, we are looking at you Angela, wanted to spend the less amount of money they could. All of this ended with a lack of money in the system. This also is one factor to the rise of the far-right.

    Tax cuts for companies and corporations created wealth for the capital. The capital grew what doesn’t help the economy.

    • Eximius@lemmy.lt
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      dominion? Surely domino? I keep seeing people misspell words, by writing completely different words. Feels like we are getting surrounded by ChatGPT.

    • Habahnow@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m not familiar with what’s happening in Germany, but i do trust apnews. What do you believe is false about the article? Have gas prices gone up in Germany?

      • idiomaddict@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        Gas prices have gone up, there’s lots of inflation, and I still pay 300€ for a fair quality apartment downtown in a 70k population city. Yes, there’s a pinch, and it might be the world’s worst performing economy this year, but there’s a lot of economic “infrastructure” that supports people here, it certainly doesn’t feel like the US did in 1999 or 2008.

        I don’t think the article is necessarily false, but too narrow in scope. They only interviewed a banker and a CEO, both from former West Germany, which is a very different perspective from that of the common man.

  • idiomaddict@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Germany grew complacent during a “golden decade” of economic growth in 2010-2020 based on reforms under Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder in 2003-2005 that lowered labor costs and increased competitiveness, says Holger Schmieding, chief economist at Berenberg bank.

    Gee, who was in power from 2005 until 2020?

    • hh93@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Someone who thought that a country with a very low level of debt should not invest money in a time where you actually got money back for taking a credit

      Their “debts are evil” stance for 15 years are extremely stupid - even more than the crippling of the roadblocks they put up for renewable

      And now people are putting the blame on the current government that had to sweep out all the dust…

      • idiomaddict@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m not a huge fan of Merkel either, but it’s nuts to think that success in 2018 was because of Schröders policies and not hers (if you want to say that they’re due to the chancellor at all, which I’m not sure I do).

        • hh93@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          not only - but Germany having one of the biggest low-income-workforces in Europe because of Schröder was still helping her a lot.

          • idiomaddict@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            I mean yeah, the previous administration will always have an effect, and she got a good opening hand. It just feels incredibly political to say that it’s from Schröder, without any other attribution, and the paper doesn’t touch on that at all.

            Especially in the context of Germany being the envy of the world- a lot of that was due to her leadership during the Great Recession.

        • GenEcon@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Its actually the result from the Agenda 2020. Economic policies take sometimes years to get results. Merkel didn’t hurt the economy in the short term though, but you you get the results now: crumbled infrastructure and dependence on Russia and China.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    Germany risks “deindustrialization” as high energy costs and government inaction on other chronic problems threaten to send new factories and high-paying jobs elsewhere, said Christian Kullmann, CEO of major German chemical company Evonik Industries AG.

    From his 21st-floor office in the west German town of Essen, Kullmann points out the symbols of earlier success across the historic Ruhr Valley industrial region: smokestacks from metal plants, giant heaps of waste from now-shuttered coal mines, a massive BP oil refinery and Evonik’s sprawling chemical production facility.

    After Russia cut off most of its gas to the European Union, spurring an energy crisis in the 27-nation bloc that had sourced 40% of the fuel from Moscow, the German government asked Evonik to keep its 1960s coal-fired power plant running a few months longer.

    These outside shocks have exposed cracks in Germany’s foundation that were ignored during years of success, including lagging use of digital technology in government and business and a lengthy process to get badly needed renewable energy projects approved.

    A 10 billion-euro ($10.68 billion) electrical line bringing wind power from the breezier north to industry in the south has faced costly delays from political resistance to unsightly above-ground towers.

    Germany grew complacent during a “golden decade” of economic growth in 2010-2020 based on reforms under Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder in 2003-2005 that lowered labor costs and increased competitiveness, says Holger Schmieding, chief economist at Berenberg bank.


    The original article contains 1,323 words, the summary contains 234 words. Saved 82%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • FarceMultiplier@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Dunno…probably has something to do with their psychotic Russian neighbours lowering property values or something.

    • Murvel@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Hell no. She left a legacy of Ostpolitik, Nordstream 1 & 2, replacing nuclear power with brown coal power plants and green washing ‘natural gas’.

      All simply enormous failures.

      Can’t say Schultz is much better, but then again, that’s why we’re reading these kinds of articles.