• Cephalotrocity@biglemmowski.win
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    I could see a situation where Trump just doesn’t allow her to get a word in edgewise. Even if he says nothing but his usual incoherent word salads, if he can essentially bully her into silence by just throwing her off with his usual interruptions, firehoses of lies, and shouting down her responses

    You know they have closed mics. How do you think this situation possible?

    • Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      4 months ago

      Trump has a natrually loud voice and loves to shout. Even if his mic is muted, her mic will still pick up at least some of what he’s saying. And viewers will still see he’s saying something.

      Plus, muted mics don’t change the fact that she’ll be sitting right near him and will be able to hear him. Even if the mics don’t pick it up, he can still throw her off. Try talking to one person while you have another person shouting nonsense at full volume into your ear. That’s what would be happening. Muted mics or no, Harris will try making her talking points and he’ll just keep shouting just to throw her off. If her mics pick it up, he’ll consider it a bonus.

      • Optional@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        That’s not his thing. He has zero interest in communicating anything to her that isn’t broadcast loudly. He’s all about the circus, the was never any substance there.

        • Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          He knows his base will still see it, even if they don’t hear everything. That is what he cares about. Messaging the base. And his message is going to be to “put her in her place”. He has absolute interest in portraying himself as the alpha male who does his own thing, rules and norms be damned. That’s his whole brand.

          And this is assuming that the moderators have a spine. Do you think they’re going to actively shut his mic off if he goes past time? There’s zero chance of that happening. Trump going off at random on a hot mic = ratings. Trump demanded no fact checking last time and he got it. They continually give in to Trump’s demands because they want to continue having access to him, they don’t want to be labelled as “fake news” in one of his tweets, and they know that his soundbytes generate attention, and therefore ratings, and therefore money.

          There has never been an instance where Trump has been successfully corralled by debate moderators. I have no reason to believe that the next debate will magicallly be the first.

          • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 months ago

            Actually the Harris campaign wanted the mics on and it was the Trump campaign that wanted them muted.

            He knows his base will still see it, even if they don’t hear everything. That is what he cares about. Messaging the base.

            And that’s exactly why. His base is going to vote for him no matter what he does. If he wants to pander to the base, then let him. Harris will look good to moderates that are tired of their racist uncle going on rants during family get-togethers.

            As it is, if Trump rants while his mic is muted it makes him look nuts. Sure his base will like it, but how many independent voters is he going to pick up from doing this?