• Halosheep@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Are you including the fact that $100,000 in the 1950s is more than $1million after accounting for inflation?

      According to some quick googling, $1,300,000 is the modern equivalent of $100,000 in 1950. That would put you in the top 5% earners (and very nearly in the top 1%). According to the IRS, the top 5% contribute about 65% of the tax burden.

      The top 25% make up about 90% of contributions, but that starts around $70,000 annual income.

    • grepe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      that is fascinating… do you have some longer easy to read source to learn about this topic?

      also, you say those earning 100k in 1950’s only carried 20% of tax burden and now they carry 80%… what exactly is tax burden and is that number inflation adjusted? how big fraction of income distribution are we talking about?