• surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    Oh man, I’m excited for you. Today is the day you learn words can have two meanings! Wait until you see what the rest of the dictionary contains. It is crazy! But not actually crazy, because dictionaries don’t have brains.

    • Prandom_returns@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      25
      ·
      7 months ago

      Wow, clever. Did you literally hallucinate this yourself or did you ask your LLM girlfriend for help?

      And by literally, I mean figuratively.

        • Prandom_returns@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          18
          ·
          7 months ago

          I know it’s a big word, but surely you can google what anthropomorphization is? Don’t “ask” LLM, those things output garbage. Just google it.

          • bbuez@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            Watch out those software bugs may start crawling out of your keyboard

          • QuaternionsRock@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            No fucking shit it’s an anthropomorphization, nothing that can be hosted on GitHub has true human qualities…

            The point is that everyone knows what it means within that context of AI, and using other terminology would only serve to obfuscate your message such that the average person couldn’t understand it as easily.

            Non-living things also don’t have “behavior” (“the way in which someone conducts oneself or behaves”, but—hey look! People started anthropomorphizing things so much that it got added to the dictionary! (“the way in which something functions or operates”.)

            It may not be ideal, and convince some people that LLMs are more human-like than they really are, but the one thing you haven’t done is suggest an alternative that would convey its meaning as effectively to the masses.

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            You call it a large language model, but there are much bigger things, it’s only approximating a human language, and it isn’t a physical model.