• GenderNeutralBro@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    1 year ago

    One important missing piece is having information on the maximum desired size of a window. This is the size beyond which the window content stops looking good. Not having this information is one of the reasons that traditional tiling window managers have issues, especially on larger screens.

    I have been upset over losing this functionality from the classic Macintosh days for decades now. This was built into the Macintosh OS going back to at least System 7. Clicking the “expand” button in the title bar would expand (or shrink) a window to its optimum size. For Finder windows, that meant the smallest size that could display all the files without scrolling (if possible).

    Developers had to implement logic to make it work. For the most part, they did, and it worked very well up through OS 9.

    Then came OS X. The green button, at first, worked exactly the same way it did in OS 9. The problem was that even Apple didn’t give a damn to write any logic for it into their apps. It might as well have been a “randomize” button. Users got frustrated. Windows converts wondered why there was no “maximize” button and blamed the very concept of expanding rather than Apple’s now-piss-poor implementation. Longtime Mac users wondered why we effectively lost a very useful feature.

    Over the years, Apple continued to neglect the function of the green button, and third-party devs largely followed suit. Eventually Apple changed the default behavior of the green button to go into full-screen mode, hiding the original (still mostly broken) “zoom” functionality behind an Option-click. At this point, the the difference is effectively “full screen” vs “windowed full screen”. RIP the classic Mac OS expand function.

    • asparagapple@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Although the functionality is still abysmal, you can also double click the title/header bar to zoom.

        • asparagapple@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Similar to maximize but it tries to expand the window only enough to show all the content without needing to scroll.

  • Shertson@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    1 year ago

    A good start would be to implement quarter tiling by dragging window to screen corner, like half tiling is done by dragging to screen edge.

    I have a 3840x2160 monitor specifically so that I can have four windows open at the best size for their content (email, document, web browse, and terminal) and can avoid the use of workspaces and see everything at once. Having to manually resize and place windows is a pain.

    • CalcProgrammer1@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Quarter tiling is huge on a 4K screen. I use a 4K screen when I’m doing YouTube programming videos sometimes and want to have OBS, a camera preview, an HDMI capture preview, and sometimes an app I want to put on screen open at the same time and quarter tiling is great for this. I currently have to use an extension to get this functionality on GNOME, but it would be awesome to have it built in.

      • InFerNo@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Seems like quarter tiling is a nice start, with additional splitting when dragging a window over another as shown in the OP.

    • SpicyTofuSoup@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Have you tried the Pop Shell gnome extension? It allows you to toggle i3wm like window tiling. It’s also similar to Rectangle on macOS

      • Shertson@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I have tried it. It resizes windows weirdly. I haven’t dug through the settings for it, so it could be fixable. No matter how I resize my terminal, it always snaps to smaller than a quarter of the screen. Thunderbird seems to always resize bigger than a quarter of the screen. It’s still better than nothing, but I’d love for it to be built in.

  • Vincent@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is looking really great, and I want it now. Wish I didn’t know about it until just before I could use it :P

  • Nemo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Looks really interesting, hopefully this can be a step forward for window management as a whole

  • apprehensively_human@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Moving maximized windows to their own workspace seems like a really cool idea. Workspace management is one of the things I struggle with so I usually just end up with way too many tiled windows on a single screen when they could be moved around more efficiently.

    • Virkkunen@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s pretty much how MacOS does, but I wouldn’t call Mac’s window management good by any means.

      • maiskanzler@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, I am regularly confused by it. I prefer having my maximized windows as normal windows in a virtual desktop. I can then minimize them and work with the windows below as usual. The MacOS approach is very different in that regard. I prefer managing virtual desktops myself, as it allows me to organize stuff and allows me to keep a simple overview of my virtual working layout in the back of my head. Dynamically changing the amount of virtual desktops/maximized windows is just too counterintuitive for my taste.

  • uniqueid198x@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ve been using paperwm on gnome for a couple years now, it’s my preferred paradigm for tiling. This looks like it has a lot of the same influences, so I’m interested in seeing where it goes

  • Bogasse@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    I love the direction this is going, I’ve been using i3/sway for years and gnome apps recently became awesome in tiling mode because of their responsiveness. If this is implemented this could definitely get me back on gnome 👍

    • Chewy@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yes, I’ll definitely give tiling on Gnome a try again once this lands. Tiling mainly the reason I’m looking forward to System76’s new Cosmic DE.

  • tombuben@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    When I was using Gnome on a laptop, I really enjoyed the PaperWM tiling manager extension. It’s not exactly something that can be used with a mouse, but it’s a really pleasant touchpad/touch first multitasking interface, where instead of having traditional workspaces that are constrained to the size of your monitor, you basically get infinite horizontally scrollable workspaces that are a joy to navigate with a touchpad.

  • lynny@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Are they going to rethink putting thumbnails in the file selection dialog or many of their other insane decisions?

    Gnome seems like they want to take the Apple approach to UI design without the attention to detail that Apple’s UX has.

    • Virkkunen@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I always disliked Gnome because of this and also because it seems like the developers want to force their tastes and use cases to everyone else. You either learn to work their way, or move out. That’s one of the many things I like about KDE, despite the devs having their preferred default way of doing things, they leave options for the users to decide in an easy way (i.e. having everything in the settings menu, without needing to download and install a separate program or manually editing config files)

  • rayon@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    This looks cool. I might consider trying GNOME again if it gets implemented.

  • Gamma@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    If this becomes a Wayland protocol, then I’d love to see other desktops adopt it as well.

    I could see a few classic TWMs use those hints, or at least expose them for users to script functionality.

  • blackbrook@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    You can only focus your eyes on one window at a time. Alt-tab swapping between windows covers the vast majority of my use cases. Arranging windows next to each other to view them at the same time is a waste of time, other than a few rare use cases for me. What would be an improvement would be better ways to manage sets of windows to alt-tab through.

  • Spectacle8011@lemmy.comfysnug.space
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    As long as the windows are being maximised into a workspace you can jump to with SUPER+[0-9], this seems interesting, if overly reliant on the mouse.

  • IronKrill@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Looks well thought out, I’m interested! I think the biggest problem will be leaving the user enough control to modify the layouts after they’ve launched and not downsize apps after the user has upsized them and the like. As long as that is overcome this would be a fantastic way to use the desktop.