• Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    60
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    10 months ago

    To be fair, right after that, the article says:

    Haney said his legislation would likely limit the number of pets landlords must accept and allow landlords to require pet liability insurance. Details on how many pets would be covered under the bill are still being worked out.

    But I also don’t think this bill is worth giving a shit about when people without pets can’t even afford to rent.

    • yeather@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      38
      ·
      10 months ago

      That’s true, I think it’s disengenuous of the article to try and play both sides here. Luckily I don’t live in the hell hole that is San Fransisco.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        Whether you do or not, people have to because that’s where the jobs are. And they can’t afford to. And that’s the real problem.

        • yeather@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          49
          ·
          10 months ago

          Learn to plumb or be an electrician. Both are very in demand and pay well.

          • toiletobserver@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            27
            ·
            10 months ago

            While i support trades, specifically those that have unions, even a journeyman plumber would have problems affording rent at $37.80 per hour. The average rent in San Francisco is $3276. Not including taxes, medical, retirement, food, Union dues, or anything else, a plumber would have to work 100 hours to cover rent. Using round numbers, that far exceeds the target of rent being 30% or less of someone’s income.

            • yeather@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              29
              ·
              10 months ago

              That would also involve moving to less expensive areas where the pay is good and cost of living is lower. Not everyone that lives in the bay area should live in the bay area.

              • toiletobserver@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                17
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                10 months ago

                What solution would you like to see that resolves the pay to rent gap? I’m pretty sure cities need the trades people, we’re just haggling over “how” now.

                • yeather@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  20
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  10 months ago

                  Poor people cannot afford the city, if wages rise so will rents and other products in turn, leading to overregulation and strangles on the market until landlords would rather have empty homes than deal with tenants.

                  • JamesTBagg@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    14
                    arrow-down
                    3
                    ·
                    10 months ago

                    Landlords are already leaving housing empty rather than lower rents. Perhaps heavy handed regulations are needed because unfettered capitalism isn’t offering any solutions.

              • Apathy Tree@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                7
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                10 months ago

                So wait, is anyone supposed to be left there other than the few well off people who can already afford it comfortably??

                How do you expect that not to immediately collapse?

                • yeather@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  12
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  That’s the point, the people doing the work move away, the market falls to a level people can live in the city, everything balances out again. The only issue would be making sure the people stay away and the issue doesn’t happen again.

                  • Apathy Tree@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    11
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    10 months ago

                    But that’s not what would happen because the people who can’t afford to live there are mostly the people who make society function.

                    You can’t have a working city without the people at the bottom. So what you are proposing is that the city should collapse.

                    Rather than, you know… just making sure people can afford to live there instead…

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            24
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            10 months ago

            I’m not sure what you’re talking about. Do you think everyone in San Francisco can be a plumber or an electrician?

            People need to do things like work the espresso machine at Starbucks because, at least for now, we don’t have robots to do it. And they can’t afford to live in the city.

            • yeather@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              31
              ·
              10 months ago

              No, not everyone in San Fransisco can be an electrician or plumber, but the many that are complaining about high prices of rent can learn a trade and move to lower cost areas where the pay is good. The people working Starbucks espresso machines are in the same boat. If you’re working 40+ hours a week and can’t find a place with roomates to live you need to move somewhere more affordable.

              • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                27
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                10 months ago

                If you’re working 40+ hours a week and can’t find a place with roomates to live you need to move somewhere more affordable.

                Fine. Who is going to make the coffee? Or flip the burgers? Or wash the dishes? Or deliver pizza?

                Should San Francisco not have any low-cost food options?

                Because you sure don’t sound like you think service industry workers deserve more pay.

                • yeather@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  27
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  If you cannot afford to live in San Fransisco you shouldn’t live in San Fransisco. If all of these people left, the market would fall to the point where the city becomes affordable again. The rich hate being inconvenienced more than anything, and if all these workers moved to cheaper areas they would feel it.

                  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    19
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    10 months ago

                    You think only rich people drink coffee and expect to eat off of clean dishes? Really?

                    Also, what cheaper areas would those be? And why should they have to endure even longer commutes than they already endure?

                    All of this sounds like you want to punish poor people because they’re poor.

                  • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    10 months ago

                    Ok, where do you live. I want a town name. You tell us where the cheap housing is, and I guarantee that Californians will fuck up your housing market because we have the money to do so. Ask literally anyone in rural America about Californians and the housing prices.

          • stoly@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            And both destroy your body. People who say what you just did neglect to explain that they can’t walk stairs without pain and their shoulder aches painfully when it gets cold.

            • yeather@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              10
              ·
              edit-2
              10 months ago

              Weak, my grandfather was a master plumber, lived his whole 92 years completely fine until he caught the black lung after 9/11. The people’s whose bodys are destroyed are the ones who don’t take care of them in the first place, take care of your body, prioritize yourself, and you’ll be fine.

              • stoly@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                10 months ago

                Blah blah you have an anecdote. George burns worked until nearly 100 and lived a terribly unhealthy lifestyle. Don’t copy him.

                • yeather@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  5
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  And? People work these kinds of jobs and are fine for all their life, but because some don’t take care of themselves it vilifies the job as being hard on your knees and you’ll never be able to walk again.

                  • stoly@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    10 months ago

                    Because the people who do this sort of work know that they are destroying their bodies so they fashion themselves into some sort of folk hero warrior that are some of the few people who live an authentic life compared to all the idiots around them. All of what you said is really something that exists within your own brain.

      • stoly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Sad that you couldn’t leave a simple comment without insulting hundreds of thousands of people for no reason. Pretty pathetic really.

        • yeather@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          24
          ·
          10 months ago

          It’s sad millions of people want to live wall to wall in a city that treats illegal aliens and street shitters better than the tax payer.

            • Pips@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              10 months ago

              No, people like that drink their right wing Flavor Aid and assume the talking points reflect reality. The person everyone is arguing with also believes that rent will come down if Starbucks employees leave, ignoring both the actual price fixing scheme in the rental market and the fact that prices keep being driven up by external factors unrelated to the labor and consumer markets in San Francisco.

            • yeather@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              15
              ·
              10 months ago

              The City of San Fransisco is currently more worried about making space for illegal immigrants and homeless people more than improving the lives of taxpayers and upstanding citizens. Any govenment that has such housing epidemics that they must overegulate to even try and have a semblance of normalcy while also touting the area as a safe haven for illegals is corrupt.

              • stoly@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                10 months ago

                LOL you’re never going to stop pushing your personal narrative against reality, are you? Why even come here to spout nonsense that people will attack you over? You should find a MAGA rock and hide under it again.

                • yeather@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  8
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  https://www.vox.com/a/homeless-san-francisco-tech-boom Establishes the housing crisis for more than just the very poor, affects normal people with decent paying jobs.

                  https://www.sf.gov/information/sanctuary-city-ordinance Establishes the city as a sanctuary for illegal immigrants. Including not asking if people are citizens for city funds, benefits, and services.

                  While Americans toil and struggle to find housing in these areas, the city of San Fransisco would rather focus on improving the city for illegal immigrants over helping Americans. If San Fransisco wants to solve some of their issues they can start by repealing Sanctuary City laws and working with ICE to remove criminals from the US.

                  • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    5
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    10 months ago

                    Thanks for admitting you are lying. No need to respond. I already have you tagged as a “anti-proletariat leftover liar.”