• PugJesus@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    There’s a really good chance that most other countries simply don’t have that much war materiel to dump into Ukraine compared to the US.

    Yeah. During the intervention in Libya, our NATO allies ran out of precision munitions after less than a month of bombing.

    The US is the only member of NATO which is ready enough and large enough to back Ukraine in the short-term.

    • sailingbythelee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 months ago

      Absolutely true. What I find puzzling is the hesitation to support Ukraine. If the US wants to pivot to Asia, it will need to ramp up its war industry. No better way to do that than to sell or give lots and lots of war materiel to Ukraine. A war for Taiwan and/or an expansion of war in the Middle East will require a huge build-up of industrial capacity to mass manufacture ammunition, missiles, computer components, tanks, trucks, artillery guns, combat aircraft, surface ships, and submarines, plus the primary industries needed to produce all of the raw materials required. Also, where are we going to get business and consumer products if we support Taiwan in a war with China?

      If people give it more than a minute of thought, they’ll realize that we are utterly unprepared to defend Taiwan. I’m not sure if NATO could even handle a war with Iran right now, but it would certainly be much easier if Russia were first defeated in Ukraine.

      All that is to say that any pre-Trump iteration of the Republican Party would have jumped at the chance to help Ukraine as a way of reducing Russia, supporting the military industrial complex, and readying for great power competition. Apparently, the Republicans don’t care about foreign affairs anymore.