• notSys@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    I can understand why would someone want to criminalize homisexuality or transexuality. I think those reasons are utterly stupid and deeply immoral, but at least I can see the reasoning behind them. But asexuality?

    • Bob@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 days ago

      Homosexuals and asexuals are functionally the same in that they don’t want to engage in reproductive sex. This creates a smaller tax base and must therefore be discouraged.

        • Tiral@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          That’s kinda a huge problem. So Africa much like the 1800s in first world countries, you’d have like 9 kids because maybe 3 would make it to 18+. When vaccines, antibiotics, ect were discovered suddenly only like 1 or 2 of these 9 kids died before 18. So we stopped having a ton of kids and had kike 1-3 typically.

          In Africa while maybe being behind the are benifiting from medial advances and less kids are dying. But now because of that they’re still having 9 kids and they have no food or water because of overpopulation among other things.

          • gandalf_der_13te@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 hours ago

            africa is really thinly populated. niger has 23 people /km², while germany has 230 pp/km².

            how do you explain that?