• MummifiedClient5000@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    83
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 days ago

    Note that this is not about the rape that he committed. Or about the identity theft that he committed - This is an entirely different case. It just happens that he is also guilty of rape and identity theft, but there’s no need to mention the raping and scamming when discussing this particular case.

    • AfterlifeAdventures@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      8 days ago

      Funny all my priors are taken into consideration whenever I break the law, funny rules for me but not thee, fuck that long hard prison time

    • justOnePersistentKbinPlease@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      8 days ago

      The article mentions those.

      It heavily mentions the ID theft since this voids the ID theft probation deal he had and is precisely what Boebert is asking for leniency on.

    • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      9 days ago

      Okay so when you are saying he raped someone your talking about the charge he got for sharing a video of him having sex with a 17 year old at age 18? Guys a piece of shit and shouldn’t have shared that or filmed it. But every state has laws pertaining to what is considered consensual when they are around the same age.

      Or are you talking about yet another case this person somehow to up to while doing everything else wrong

      • bedwyr@piefed.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 days ago

        Those kind of laws have led to underage people getting charged for disseminating child porn for sharing naked pics of themselves consensually. Not sure about in CO but in other states.

        • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          8 days ago

          So the woman who was over the age of consent had sex with a man less than a year older who was age of consent. Do you firmly believe that should be repeated over and over as rape? Or do you think that the courts are charging the person for another charge because it was clearly for a different charge

          • Kirp123@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 days ago

            He was charged with Child Sexual Exploitation, not rape. The guy above probably thought he was charged with statutory rape or something. And I never said it was rape, I said it was that charge he was talking about and not a new charge.

            • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              8 days ago

              Yes, that is what I want to make completely clear to someone. Follow the laws in your area. You aren’t a rapist if you have sex with your partner who is of consentual age. You are a fucking asshole if you film it and post it online. Charge him and make sure he is punished. But don’t make people believe rape has no meaning. It hurts every person actually raped when it comes to court. People thinking kids less than a year apart auto means rape… Is fucking stupid