Okay so when you are saying he raped someone your talking about the charge he got for sharing a video of him having sex with a 17 year old at age 18? Guys a piece of shit and shouldn’t have shared that or filmed it. But every state has laws pertaining to what is considered consensual when they are around the same age.
Or are you talking about yet another case this person somehow to up to while doing everything else wrong
Those kind of laws have led to underage people getting charged for disseminating child porn for sharing naked pics of themselves consensually. Not sure about in CO but in other states.
So the woman who was over the age of consent had sex with a man less than a year older who was age of consent. Do you firmly believe that should be repeated over and over as rape? Or do you think that the courts are charging the person for another charge because it was clearly for a different charge
He was charged with Child Sexual Exploitation, not rape. The guy above probably thought he was charged with statutory rape or something. And I never said it was rape, I said it was that charge he was talking about and not a new charge.
Yes, that is what I want to make completely clear to someone. Follow the laws in your area. You aren’t a rapist if you have sex with your partner who is of consentual age. You are a fucking asshole if you film it and post it online. Charge him and make sure he is punished. But don’t make people believe rape has no meaning. It hurts every person actually raped when it comes to court. People thinking kids less than a year apart auto means rape… Is fucking stupid
Okay so when you are saying he raped someone your talking about the charge he got for sharing a video of him having sex with a 17 year old at age 18? Guys a piece of shit and shouldn’t have shared that or filmed it. But every state has laws pertaining to what is considered consensual when they are around the same age.
Or are you talking about yet another case this person somehow to up to while doing everything else wrong
Those kind of laws have led to underage people getting charged for disseminating child porn for sharing naked pics of themselves consensually. Not sure about in CO but in other states.
Yeah it’s that charge he’s talking about. It’s mentioned in the article.
So the woman who was over the age of consent had sex with a man less than a year older who was age of consent. Do you firmly believe that should be repeated over and over as rape? Or do you think that the courts are charging the person for another charge because it was clearly for a different charge
He was charged with Child Sexual Exploitation, not rape. The guy above probably thought he was charged with statutory rape or something. And I never said it was rape, I said it was that charge he was talking about and not a new charge.
Yes, that is what I want to make completely clear to someone. Follow the laws in your area. You aren’t a rapist if you have sex with your partner who is of consentual age. You are a fucking asshole if you film it and post it online. Charge him and make sure he is punished. But don’t make people believe rape has no meaning. It hurts every person actually raped when it comes to court. People thinking kids less than a year apart auto means rape… Is fucking stupid
So brave of you to defend the manufacture and distribution of child pornography.