• SaraTonin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Not allowed. I’ll copy from another post:

    No, there’s already rules in place from the previous government which says that all new builds and buildings euch are changing their use must have separate, sex-segregated toilets, unless the building is physically too small for anything other than a single room with a single toilet and sink. You can have gender-neutral toilets as well but not instead

    • bstix@feddit.dk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      52 minutes ago

      All single toilets are sex-segregated if you enter alone and close the door.

      Your sex is on one side of the door, all other sexes are on the other.

      The issue only happens when you attempt to write a sign that predicts the sex, or if more people has to take a shit together in the same room.

      • SaraTonin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        37 minutes ago

        As the law stands at the moment, if you’re building a new non-domestic building or changing the function of an existing building and you have three toilets, each of which is a single room containing one individual toilet and a sink and which can be locked from the inside, then cannot all be accessible to everybody. One must be exclusively for women and one for men. And, as per the new guidence, which one someone can use is solely to be determined by what gender they were assigned at birth

        Yes, it’s incredibly stupid, but that’s what the law currently says

      • SaraTonin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        43 minutes ago

        I know, right? This government has chosen to go “well, if the Supreme Court says we have to discriminate against trans people, then i guess we do “, rather than ” if the law can be interpreted in that way then it’s obviously wrong or unclear. We have a large majority and a progressive core of voters, let’s change the law “

        It’s like come on guys, this is exactly the strength of the UK NOT having a written constitution - you can change the law and thereby change the constitution

    • tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 hours ago

      So make the toilets as outlined above, but on the last two doors in the row mark one male and one female.

      • bthest@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        8 hours ago

        Yeah. The minority of loud stupid/paid people who care about this really are the ones who should be inconvenienced. If you want a gendered bathroom then there’s an outbuilding you can use. It’s on one plot so technically we’re still within code.

        • SaraTonin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          46 minutes ago

          I’m far from an expert on this, but my understanding is that that could work, but it could also fall foul of other building regs, specifically the H&S regulations of 1992, which talk about toilets being suitable and sufficient

          In my inexpert opinion it’d be enough of a grey area that you could challenge it in court if you were told it wasn’t allowed. In practical terms, no company is likely to do this unless they were specifically trying to take it to court to challenge the law or bring it more public agenda

          But it’s s good idea and I’d support any company that tried it