• nova_ad_vitum@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Who is we? Plenty of people support this.

    Context: US political polarization is too severe to be contained. It’s too severe for non-partisan organizations and institutions to truly exist. These aren’t political differences competing in the marketplace of ideas. It’s opposing cultures that are more invested in their side winning than in the system that keeps all of this mostly non-violent (democracy).

    In this case: Populations shift, maps have to be periodically redrawn by people. Those people will wield political power whether they want to or not, so controlling who gets that power and what they do with it is a natural incentive.

    Many countries do these maps in a mostly non-partisan way, but that is only possible when the majority of people believe the system of democracy to be more important than any one (potentially bad) outcome. That is simply not the case in the US. The power to redraw maps must exist and at the level of political polarization that exists in the US, that power will ultimately be corrupted for partisan ends.

    • wolfpack86@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      They do it in a way where there are much smaller districts. Then the realities of slightly skewed districts offset on the balance… And you also have multiple parties.

      The parties in the US draw them to pre-decide outcomes