But asking for a mechanism for states to over rule the supreme court with a 3/4 majority exists… They just make an amendment enshrining or banning whatever is allowed. It’s basically the same standard.
(On constitutional matters… And as others say changing laws on non constitutional matters already exists)
They’re not paying for additive demand. If grid updates or plant expansions cost $1b then that’s distributed across all customers equally based on their consumption. So let’s say there’s 1m customers and the utility spread the costs over 10 years… $100 more per customer assuming equal consumption across.
Schiff is proposing the data center itself is saddled with the $1b and all other customers bills are held flat.
Let me guess… They have ten patients and only 1 is an illegal alien?
When it goes completely flat it increases the odds of sidewall damage at least
That’s not why comedians do that… They do it so there’s nothing on YouTube with the given joke and they can both sell seats at the next city and sell the act to Netflix and the like at the end of the tour.
Its not when you catch someone looking. It’s when someone stares blankly because what you said is so stupid it doesn’t warrant a response.
Saying “take a picture it would last longer” doesn’t work functionally in this context.
This isn’t that.
The jury, comprised of people who certainly have been fucked similarly, can find in the gyms favor and award them a whopping $1 in damages.
Good luck convincing regular people bullshit cancellation policy is a gold reason to make someone pay
I’d argue the paper is “ID” for the purposes of this discussion and it’s freely provided by the government with no burden to the citizen.
Then pay for it through taxes for fucks sake
In my experience in an EU country, sufficient ID was also provided freely by the government (eg a social security card).
This is not something in the US that is free. ID must also be a photo ID. So let’s say you have a job where you work 7 days a week and take the bus because you don’t have a driver’s license. To get sufficient ID you must then: take unpaid time off of work, get to an office that issues ID, pay like $20 for such an ID… All to have the opportunity to exercise the right to vote.
This is both a tax and an unreasonable burden, effectively disenfranchising millions of poor people.
This is solvable though, if the government issues free IDs and sets something up to facilitate people getting their photos taken. However that would never be executed effectively, nor would people support paying the costs.
Aside from having digital post for public services and official mail from things like financial institutions, nobody’s stopping you from putting paper into a parcel envelope or using DAO who is taking over letter delivery.
And then everyone clapped
And his father? Because it also says clearly that as long as one parent is a green card holder or citizen that citizen ship is granted.
Came across this post today. https://bsky.app/profile/kojamf.bsky.social/post/3ltav35egbs2q
How would you classify this? I know it to be fake, but its created to make a point. But its good enough that someone could be fooled intl believing it was real, no?
Imagine a primary with AOC, Pete Buttegieg, and maybe a third younger candidate…
All could be really exciting to see advance, but they’ll split the vote and open the way for some stupid fucking corpse to win.
I hate this system.
I hear you, but this is subjective and not objective. A bad faith actor, presumably an authoritarian government, can exploit laws like this to advance their agenda. “Yes, I was definitely convinced that was George HW Bush”.
Subjective judgements are ripe for abuse of power, sadly.
It’s a slippery slope from something that is otherwise well intentioned.
Define what a deep fake is over a parody or other political commentary.
They do it in a way where there are much smaller districts. Then the realities of slightly skewed districts offset on the balance… And you also have multiple parties.
The parties in the US draw them to pre-decide outcomes