First off, let’s make a little correction to your accusations. I didn’t like Harris, but Harris vs Trump was no contest. First Past the Post isn’t a three-horse race. And I’d rather have seen her get and and get beat down in protests than motions to the entire US whatever the fuck we have going on here.
Based on the verifiable knowledge above, I question your basis for your claim that election data varies significantly by news sources,
I didn’t say that, you did. The popular vote difference after your math was 0.09% Which is far below your position that it was no where near enough. That tells me you just looked at the math instead of just following your echo chamber now. That .09% is an error bar for lost mail.
I state that Holocaust Harris would’ve lost even if she secured every single third-party vote.
That statement is at the very least misleading and at the most bait. The Election was won in purple (or blue-border, if you will) states due to a surge in red-area turnout and a dearth of blue-area turnout. Those red votes didn’t come from blue or independent; those blue votes didn’t go to or come from independent. The popular vote was exceedingly close as the ‘math’ you provided shows. And due to years of facism taking foot, quite a number of those electoral college seats are strongly biased.
“leftists cost my beloved Madam Genocidaire the presidency”
No, the truth of the matter is people like you ranting that an A/B race with no C option caused further disenfranchisement on the blue side, enough to let the right walk in and take it over, and I can’t quite decide if the far left were actually ignorant enough to help the right, or extra vocal people like yourself were outright purchased by the right to ensure their win.
First off, let’s make a little correction to your accusations. I didn’t like Harris, but Harris vs Trump was no contest. First Past the Post isn’t a three-horse race. And I’d rather have seen her get and and get beat down in protests than motions to the entire US whatever the fuck we have going on here.
I didn’t say that, you did. The popular vote difference after your math was 0.09% Which is far below your position that it was no where near enough. That tells me you just looked at the math instead of just following your echo chamber now. That .09% is an error bar for lost mail.
That statement is at the very least misleading and at the most bait. The Election was won in purple (or blue-border, if you will) states due to a surge in red-area turnout and a dearth of blue-area turnout. Those red votes didn’t come from blue or independent; those blue votes didn’t go to or come from independent. The popular vote was exceedingly close as the ‘math’ you provided shows. And due to years of facism taking foot, quite a number of those electoral college seats are strongly biased.
No, the truth of the matter is people like you ranting that an A/B race with no C option caused further disenfranchisement on the blue side, enough to let the right walk in and take it over, and I can’t quite decide if the far left were actually ignorant enough to help the right, or extra vocal people like yourself were outright purchased by the right to ensure their win.