“We will see if this is a legal and valid election,” Stefanik, a member of House GOP leadership and a Donald Trump ally, said in an interview with “Meet the Press.”

Rep. Elise Stefanik, R-N.Y., on Sunday wouldn’t commit to certifying the 2024 election results during an interview on NBC News’ “Meet the Press.”

While interviewing Stefanik, who serves in House Republican leadership, host Kristen Welker asked, “Would you vote to certify, and will you vote to certify, the results of the 2024 election no matter what they show?”

Stefanik, who has boosted former President Donald Trump’s baseless claims of widespread fraud in the 2020 election, said that she did not vote to certify the 2020 results in the state of Pennsylvania and several other states because there were “unconstitutional acts circumventing the state legislature and unilaterally changing election law.”

  • badaboomxx@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    In this case is not about right now cerifying the results since the election are yet to start, much less to know who is going to win.

    The issue is that these traitors tried to say that the election was stolen and even tried to do illegal things to cancel or delay the results.

    She was asked I’d she is going to certify the election regardless of who wins even if she doesn’t like the results, and yet she failed to do so.

    • DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      No, she wasn’t whether she will certify it if “she doesnt like the results.”

      The exact question she was asked is even in the excerpt.

      Maybe you should read it.

      • badaboomxx@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Kind of ironic, more when the question is written there.

        “Would you vote to certify the 2024 election, no matter what they show”

        Maybe it is you who cannot comprehend what you read.

        • DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          Uh huh.

          And, Great Minds, why would anyone say yes unequivocally before an election that hasn’t happened and might have actual fraud in it?

          • badaboomxx@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Dur, are you that dumb or what ? Even If you don’t like the results, you have to accept them. That is the whole issue about it.

            It is not a matter of a toddler wanting another toy, it is a politician. I know that you and that idiot also have the mental capacity of a toddler but without restrictions. Even if you don’t like the result you have to accept it.