I see a lot about source codes being leaked and I’m wondering how it that you could make something like an exact replica of Super Mario Bros without the source code or how you can’t take the finished product and run it back through the compilation software?

  • noli@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    10 months ago

    Isn’t that still the same exact process as a normal compiler except in the case of embedded systems your OS is like a couple kilobytes large and just compiled along with the rest of your code?

    As in, are those “crazy optimizations” not just standard compiler techniques, except applied to the entire OS+applications?

    • morhp@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 months ago

      The main difference is that when you compile a program for Windows, Linux etc., you have an operating system and kernel with their exposed functions/interfaces so even in a compiled program it’s pretty easy to find the function calls for opening a file, moving a window, etc. (as long as the developer doesn’t add specific steps hiding these calls). But in an embedded system, it’s one large mess without any interfaces apart from those directly on the hardware level.

    • Treczoks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      In a way, yes. But it really creates a mess when the linker starts sharing code between your code of which you have sources, and then jumps in the middle of system code for which you don’t have sources. And a pain in the whatever to debug.

      • noli@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        Don’t you have the code in most cases? Like with e.g. freeRTOS? That’s fully open source

          • noli@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            Does commercial mean closed source in this context though? It seems like a waste of resources not to provide the source code for an rtos.

            Considering how small in size they tend to be + with their power/computational constraints I can’t imagine they have very effective DRM in place so it shouldn’t take that much to reverse engineer.

            May as well just provide the source under some very restrictive license.

            • Treczoks@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              Yes, it is closed source, but you can buy a “source license”. Which is painfully expensive.