Announced in early August and initially planned for the end of the month, the Fedora Asahi Remix distribution is finally here for those who want to install the Fedora Linux operating system on their Apple Silicon Macs.

The distro is based on the latest Fedora Linux 39 release and ships with the KDE Plasma 5.27 LTS desktop environment by default, using Wayland.

  • heliumlake@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Been daily driving Asahi (first ALARM then Fedora when they transitioned) and it’s been exciting to experience in real time how far the project has come. When I first installed, audio didn’t work, the graphics driver was incomplete, and battery life left a lot to be desired. Skip to today and it’s evident how committed marcan and other contributors are to not just porting, but making everything feel right. Highly suggest following him or Lina on Mastodon.

  • mFat@lemdro.id
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    I mean this is what a proper distro loooks like. Tailoring another distro for a true, specific purpose. Kudos to the team.

    • V ‎ ‎ @beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Yes, it’s not just a DE and default package set but actual system improvements other distros aren’t offering. Kudos to the Asahi team for making this possible!

  • Grass@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    I would install this if I had made the objectively wrong decision to buy an apple computer.

    • magikmw@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      It makes a second hand mac viable for me. The hardware is nice, it was always the OS that made me avoid it.

      • Grass@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        I would if the particular hardware had no inherent or user caused issues and the price was reasonable compared to other purchase candidates, but it rarely is. It would also need to be Linux compatible too because the os has always been insufferable and praised by insufferable people that need something to feel superior about with zero justification.

        The PowerPC days were pretty crap though even though the hardware was visually pleasing. Nobody made PowerPC compatible software. This time I guess apple is paying fees to arm and at least has arm compatibility. x86 is irritating in its own right too. Man, tech has gone in all sorts of shitty directions.

  • LoveSausage@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Most are talking about the laptops. I have my eyes on a Mac mini to run asahi on. The biggest downsides with Mac hardware is reperability and upgrades. Some issues the Mac mini doesn’t have Vs laptops is ofc is no battery replacement , screen and keyboard webcam, mouse to use. and there are hubs for installing more storage. Ram is ofc a big minus. Looking at m2 16 GB 512 mb. And extend storage with something like this https://www.macworld.com/article/1677460/mac-mini-upgrade-hub-storage-ethernet-sd-card-ports.html 40 Gbs thunderbolt would make it easy to extend storage at least.

    As long as it doesn’t break I would take this over any alternative minipc . I use my ThinkPad today but 99% of use is at home anyway so no need for portability. Need to wait some time to get the extra funds for it but something like that…

    • d3Xt3r@lemmy.nzOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      As long as it doesn’t break I would take this over any alternative minipc

      May I ask why though? One of the biggest advantages of using a MacBook is the performance-battery efficiency. If you’re going to get a Mac mini and loading Linux, you lose that advantage.

      Unless you’re looking specifically for an ARM64 machine for whatever reason, I think an AMD mini PC, say something like the Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX would be technically a better option - you get dual NVMe, dual 2.5G network ports, USB 4.0, Oculink for even more b/w than Thunderbolt, and far more I/O options in general. Not to mention, excellent Linux support.

      • LoveSausage@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        I will have to look into it , but all reviews/comparisons I have seen has been always that the Mac beats the others. I do not game , I want audio and some video editing besides code.

        Power consumption is a point as well as I am planning on going off the powergrid eventually.