• BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    68
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    I’m guessing the bump to 6GHz means range is even lower. Seems we’re leaning towards a future of hardwired-equivalent speed and reliability… within 1 meter.

      • You999@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        34
        ·
        10 months ago

        I know this is a joke but please do not buy repeaters they do not work how you would expect them to work.

        Repeaters take an already weak signal and amplify that signal while increasing the latency. Sure this makes the signal go farther but it doesn’t increase the bandwidth and if you stand in between the originating wifi source and the repeater your device may not migrate to the source wifi even though it might be faster because the reapeter has the illusion of being a better signal because it’s louder.

        The better route to go is to use multiple wifi APs through out the building connected back to your router with ethernet.

        You could also go with mesh access points but you have to do a lot of research and planning; The two key things to look out for is they mesh system must have a dedicated backhaul and you must place them where each node has an excellent signal to the next node. Since most backhauls run on 5Ghz and 6Ghz this means there shouldn’t be any walls between them.

        • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          10 months ago

          Exactly. I’m going to be running Ethernet through my house soon, and even if we stay full Wi-Fi, we’ll benefit by having physical cables connecting the APs. I already have a separate AP, just need to run the cables to get a second in our basement where the signal is weak.

            • binomialchicken@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              10 months ago

              Is fiber really worth the extra complexity and expense? It’s strength is in longer distances with mostly straight runs. When you are doing short distances with multiple turns, copper is much easier and more forgiving. Splicing fiber is difficult if something breaks during or after installation, on top of the expense and skill needed for proper termination. Tools and hardware for copper are cheap, easy to use, and ubiquitous.

                • foggenbooty@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  I’m still not sure I see the need for it with copper twisted pair now being able to do over 10Gbps reliably. However I can’t fault you for future proofing. I always say pull the best copper you can, and extra of it since it’s easier to do all at once than again later.

            • Trollception@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              10 months ago

              Why would you drop fiber when you can do 10gbps on ethernet at the distances most cabling would be in a home. Never would consider to run fiber and I just finished a couple of new cat7 drops in my home.

              We have the luxury of having 1, 2.5, 10 and 25 gigabit fiber to the home but I haven’t considered even 2.5 until the services I use can leverage it

            • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              My city is rolling out fiber in a year or two, so I’ll have to ask them how that works, because I’d like to plan out where they drop it.

              • Trollception@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                10 months ago

                They don’t drop it in your home most likely. In our home it’s a box on the side of the house with the modem and they ran cat5 to our media panel in the garage.

                • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  Ours will support >1gbit (up to 10gbit allegedly), so they probably won’t run cat5, but hopefully they don’t get lazy and just run cat6 or cat6a and actually run a fiber link to the house.

    • AlternateRoute@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      10 months ago

      Yes but WiFi 7 FINALLY lets devices connect to multiple BANDS at the same time with a new feature called Multi-link operation (MLO)… IE the device can hold on to a longer range but slower band and more seamlessly transmit data over the best one at the time.

    • frezik@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      10 months ago

      That’s an advantage if you utilize it right. Less range means your neighbor’s wifi is less likely to interfere with your own. Multiple access points are a superior way to get coverage of your whole house than some octopus antenna monstrosity.

      The inverse square law doesn’t have to be a problem.

    • PHLAK@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      I think the prevalence of mesh systems is intended to remedy this. Instead of a single AP that can cover your entire house you can mesh two or three (or more) APs to get the coverage desired.

      • HeyJoe@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        10 months ago

        That’s how I do it, except because I have all these AP’s I just set them up near the devices that will use it and plug them all into the AP’s and use the backhaul which is way more reliable. Phones and tablets are the only things that use the wifi and never really found an issue with speed or reliability since moving to mesh.

      • vividspecter@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        It’s still better to have wired backhaul with multiple APs than a mesh, but it’s definitely a decent option if you can’t wire it for whatever reason.