MuskyMelon@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 24 hours ago'Hidden' provision in Trump's big bill could disarm US Supreme Courtwww.newsweek.comexternal-linkmessage-square26fedilinkarrow-up1248arrow-down12file-textcross-posted to: politics@lemmy.world
arrow-up1246arrow-down1external-link'Hidden' provision in Trump's big bill could disarm US Supreme Courtwww.newsweek.comMuskyMelon@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 24 hours agomessage-square26fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: politics@lemmy.world
minus-squaremriguy@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up11·14 hours agoYou can’t just assert that. They’ll vote whatever way they’ve been paid to vote.
minus-squareBakkoda@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·12 hours agoLook at the quality of character on the court. Compromised. Alcoholics. The kind of people you can get leverage on.
minus-squareExtantHuman@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up1·13 hours agoNot voting this down means it would be their last ever check. They’d be voting themselves into irrelevance. Greedy people aren’t likely to do that
You can’t just assert that. They’ll vote whatever way they’ve been paid to vote.
So… They’ll vote to uphold it?
Look at the quality of character on the court. Compromised. Alcoholics. The kind of people you can get leverage on.
Not voting this down means it would be their last ever check. They’d be voting themselves into irrelevance. Greedy people aren’t likely to do that